Post your recent film shots!
p.1141 #1Post your recent film shots!
grahamgibson wrote:
Voigtlander 40/1.2 Nokton
Kodak Gold 200
https://live.staticflickr.com/65535/53500184681_132f4c691a_h.jpg
Bank of America Building by Graham Gibson, on FlickrThe prior post was a local lab's scan. For whatever reason, their colors were way off on the white balance. Here's my take, scanned with the Sony A7IV and Sigma 70/2.8 Macro. Detail is about the same, but mine is also properly centered (theirs had cropped the left side a bit).
Leica CL
Voigtlander 40/1.2 Nokton
Kodak Gold 200
https://live.staticflickr.com/65535/53500755642_db2896d134_h.jpg
Bank of America Building, Take 2 by Graham Gibson, on Flickr
So it is actually a brown building vs grey? Wow, they were off. But this is often what happens with AWB in scanning/conversion. I find with NLP it often way over-warms an image if there is blue sky in it. So I turn the WB settings off and do it myself when the conversion is exported to LR.
grahamgibson wrote
Leica CLVoigtlander 40/1.2 Nokton
Kodak Gold 200
https://live.staticflickr.com/65535/53500184681_132f4c691a_h.jpg
Bank of America Building by Graham Gibson, on Flickr
Leica CL
Voigtlander 40/1.2 Nokton
Kodak Gold 200
https://live.staticflickr.com/65535/53500755642_db2896d134_h.jpg
Bank of America Building, Take 2 by Graham Gibson, on Flickr
So it is actually a brown building vs grey? Wow, they were off. But this is often what happens with AWB in scanning/conversion. I find with NLP it often way over-warms an image if there is blue sky in it. So I turn the WB settings off and do it myself when the conversion is exported to LR.
Feb 01, 2024 at 12:04 PM
p.1141 #2Post your recent film shots!
madNbad wrote:
Wow. Bar has been raised with what you can do with a $20 p&s!Thanks! But I recently got my Kodak Retina IIc back from a CLA by Paul Borden. I love this camera.
Kodak Retina IIc + Portra 160Those Schneider-Retina lenses are amazingly good.
Plus the camera is probably a lot smoother and quieter since Paul serviced it.
The camera feels so much smoother since being serviced. So much fun and the camera feels new. Love the lens on this thing.
Kodak Retina IIc + Portra 160 + Ilfasol
rji2goleez wrote
Desmolicious wrote
rji2goleez wrote
Samsung AF Slim Zoom + Ilford HP4+ + IlfasolKodak Retina IIc + Portra 160
Plus the camera is probably a lot smoother and quieter since Paul serviced it.
The camera feels so much smoother since being serviced. So much fun and the camera feels new. Love the lens on this thing.
Kodak Retina IIc + Portra 160 + Ilfasol
Feb 01, 2024 at 12:34 PM
p.1141 #3Post your recent film shots!
Desmolicious wrote:
Minilux with expired fuji x-tra 400
https://i.imgur.com/IXhUTQs.jpgLove the pastel look!
You waited five years to develop that roll? What's the back story?
Thank you.
I have been shooting with my phone and digital cameras the last several years , but I felt a bit lost and tried to pick up film cameras again.
So I checked all my film cameras November last year and found out one of my film cameras still has film in with 13 shots was taken ( embarrassing ) .
At the moment I didn't even remember what was last time I shoot film and the film supposed to be expired , but whatever I just finished it. After developed I realized I hadn't been shoot film for exactly 5 years.
Shooting film slow me down , which I really enjoy it.
zi464 wrote
From 2019 but just developed last week.Minilux with expired fuji x-tra 400
https://i.imgur.com/IXhUTQs.jpg
You waited five years to develop that roll? What's the back story?
Thank you.
I have been shooting with my phone and digital cameras the last several years , but I felt a bit lost and tried to pick up film cameras again.
So I checked all my film cameras November last year and found out one of my film cameras still has film in with 13 shots was taken ( embarrassing ) .
At the moment I didn't even remember what was last time I shoot film and the film supposed to be expired , but whatever I just finished it. After developed I realized I hadn't been shoot film for exactly 5 years.
Shooting film slow me down , which I really enjoy it.
Feb 01, 2024 at 04:46 PM
p.1141 #4Post your recent film shots!
I mistakenly shot a roll of Tri X and left the ISO at 200 from a previous roll of Portra 400 and proceeded to over expose just a wee bit more as I do with Portra. I developed the Tri X @ 400 iso in Ilfosol 3 for 7.5 min. at approximately 68-70f and the negs came out with this sublime soft contrast and grain. Not much in regards to using the zone system, but an interesting aesthetic nonetheless. At first I was like...oh crap, but after scanning, I don't hate it. I was using an EOS 1V and EF 35mm 1.4.
Feb 01, 2024 at 07:07 PM
p.1141 #6Post your recent film shots!
johnld wrote:
I mistakenly shot a roll of Tri X and left the ISO at 200 from a previous roll of Portra 400 and proceeded to over expose just a wee bit more as I do with Portra. I developed the Tri X @ 400 iso in Ilfosol 3 for 7.5 min. at approximately 68-70f and the negs came out with this sublime soft contrast and grain. Not much in regards to using the zone system, but an interesting aesthetic nonetheless. At first I was like...oh crap, but after scanning, I don't hate it. I was using an EOS 1V and EF...Show more →
Would love to see an example!
I mistakenly shot a roll of Tri X and left the ISO at 200 from a previous roll of Portra 400 and proceeded to over expose just a wee bit more as I do with Portra. I developed the Tri X @ 400 iso in Ilfosol 3 for 7.5 min. at approximately 68-70f and the negs came out with this sublime soft contrast and grain. Not much in regards to using the zone system, but an interesting aesthetic nonetheless. At first I was like...oh crap, but after scanning, I don't hate it. I was using an EOS 1V and EF...Show more →
Would love to see an example!
Feb 01, 2024 at 08:03 PM
p.1141 #10Post your recent film shots!
Leica M4-P + Voigtlander 28/1.5 Nokton + Portra 160
Feb 01, 2024 at 08:34 PM
|
p.1141 #11Post your recent film shots!
rji2goleez wrote:
Leica M4-P + Voigtlander 28/1.5 Nokton + Portra 160
Is this the new Voigtlander lens? If so, the results look very nice!
https://www.fredmiranda.com/forum/topic/1836747/0
Leica M4-P + Voigtlander 28/1.5 Nokton + Portra 160
Is this the new Voigtlander lens? If so, the results look very nice!
https://www.fredmiranda.com/forum/topic/1836747/0
Feb 01, 2024 at 11:00 PM
p.1141 #12Post your recent film shots!
rji2goleez wrote:
Leica M4-P + Voigtlander 28/1.5 Nokton + Portra 160
Not going to lie. I thought I read something else other than Supper Club.
Also, nice to see Sacramento referenced on something not found in Sacramento. haha!
Leica M4-P + Voigtlander 28/1.5 Nokton + Portra 160
Not going to lie. I thought I read something else other than Supper Club.
Also, nice to see Sacramento referenced on something not found in Sacramento. haha!
Feb 01, 2024 at 11:52 PM
p.1141 #13Post your recent film shots!
skylight1b wrote:
Would love to see an example!
I've been metering Tri-X at ISO 200 and using the developing times for 400 for a couple of years. Here's an example or two:
M4-2, Voigtlander 35 1.4 Nokton Classic SC V2, 022 filter, Tri-X @ ISO 200, Film Photography Project FPP-76 1+1:
Leica M4-2 Voigtlander 50 2.5 Color Skopar LTM, 022 filter, Tri-X @ ISO 200, Film Photography Project FPP-76 1+1:
johnld wrote
I mistakenly shot a roll of Tri X and left the ISO at 200 from a previous roll of Portra 400 and proceeded to over expose just a wee bit more as I do with Portra. I developed the Tri X @ 400 iso in Ilfosol 3 for 7.5 min. at approximately 68-70f and the negs came out with this sublime soft contrast and grain. Not much in regards to using the zone system, but an interesting aesthetic nonetheless. At first I was like...oh crap, but after scanning, I don't hate it. I was using an EOS 1V and EF 35mm 1.4.I've been metering Tri-X at ISO 200 and using the developing times for 400 for a couple of years. Here's an example or two:
M4-2, Voigtlander 35 1.4 Nokton Classic SC V2, 022 filter, Tri-X @ ISO 200, Film Photography Project FPP-76 1+1:
Leica M4-2 Voigtlander 50 2.5 Color Skopar LTM, 022 filter, Tri-X @ ISO 200, Film Photography Project FPP-76 1+1:
Feb 02, 2024 at 12:13 AM
p.1141 #14Post your recent film shots!
Desmolicious wrote:
Voigtlander 40/1.2 Nokton
Kodak Gold 200
https://live.staticflickr.com/65535/53500184681_132f4c691a_h.jpg
Bank of America Building by Graham Gibson, on FlickrThe prior post was a local lab's scan. For whatever reason, their colors were way off on the white balance. Here's my take, scanned with the Sony A7IV and Sigma 70/2.8 Macro. Detail is about the same, but mine is also properly centered (theirs had cropped the left side a bit).
Leica CL
Voigtlander 40/1.2 Nokton
Kodak Gold 200
https://live.staticflickr.com/65535/53500755642_db2896d134_h.jpg
Bank of America Building, Take 2 by Graham Gibson, on FlickrSo it is actually a brown building vs grey? Wow, they were off. But this is often what happens with AWB in scanning/conversion. I find with NLP it often way over-warms an image if there is blue sky in it. So I turn the WB settings off and do it myself when the conversion is exported to LR.
Yes, brown. I thought the other images on the roll had pretty decent WB though. This lab doesn't charge much extra for the scans anyways, so I always feel it worth the time savings. I was curious to rescan a few on my own. Sometimes I feel the lab scans get better colors than my own, but in this case yeah they were way off.
grahamgibson wrote
grahamgibson wrote
Leica CLVoigtlander 40/1.2 Nokton
Kodak Gold 200
https://live.staticflickr.com/65535/53500184681_132f4c691a_h.jpg
Bank of America Building by Graham Gibson, on Flickr
Leica CL
Voigtlander 40/1.2 Nokton
Kodak Gold 200
https://live.staticflickr.com/65535/53500755642_db2896d134_h.jpg
Bank of America Building, Take 2 by Graham Gibson, on Flickr
Yes, brown. I thought the other images on the roll had pretty decent WB though. This lab doesn't charge much extra for the scans anyways, so I always feel it worth the time savings. I was curious to rescan a few on my own. Sometimes I feel the lab scans get better colors than my own, but in this case yeah they were way off.
Feb 02, 2024 at 01:07 AM
p.1141 #15Post your recent film shots!
Leica M2, LLL 35mm Fomapan 400 pushed 2 stops (exposed @ ~1,000 ISO) pushed 2 stops in Xtol stock
Paris, France
January, 2024
I've been enjoying the simplicity of the M2 and the compact LLL 35mm for carrying around on long walks. I was anxious that the Fomapan would do well pushed, but it didn't come out bad. It's not HP5 when it comes to latitude and tonality, but it produces completely useable negatives when pushed and developed in Xtol. Since the actual sensitivity is more around 280 or so, I tried to expose at 1,000 ISO rather than the typical two stop push for 400 film which would be 1,600 ISO. I'm interested to see what a roll would look like semi-stand developed in HC-110.
Paris, France
January, 2024
I've been enjoying the simplicity of the M2 and the compact LLL 35mm for carrying around on long walks. I was anxious that the Fomapan would do well pushed, but it didn't come out bad. It's not HP5 when it comes to latitude and tonality, but it produces completely useable negatives when pushed and developed in Xtol. Since the actual sensitivity is more around 280 or so, I tried to expose at 1,000 ISO rather than the typical two stop push for 400 film which would be 1,600 ISO. I'm interested to see what a roll would look like semi-stand developed in HC-110.
Feb 02, 2024 at 01:12 AM
p.1141 #16Post your recent film shots!
dourbalistar wrote:
Is this the new Voigtlander lens? If so, the results look very nice!
https://www.fredmiranda.com/forum/topic/1836747/0
Yes, this is the new Voigtlander 28/1.5 Nokton. So far, loving this lens . . .
rji2goleez wrote
Leica M4-P + Voigtlander 28/1.5 Nokton + Portra 160https://www.fredmiranda.com/forum/topic/1836747/0
Yes, this is the new Voigtlander 28/1.5 Nokton. So far, loving this lens . . .
Feb 02, 2024 at 05:47 AM
p.1141 #18Post your recent film shots!
Some images shot on Contax 645 and Portra 400, lenses used: Carl Zeiss 80mm F2 planar and Carl Zeiss 35mm F3.5 Distago (unless they were all shot with the 80mm, can't remember)
Feb 02, 2024 at 06:39 AM
p.1141 #19Post your recent film shots!
madNbad wrote:
Would love to see an example!I've been metering Tri-X at ISO 200 and using the developing times for 400 for a couple of years. Here's an example or two:
M4-2, Voigtlander 35 1.4 Nokton Classic SC V2, 022 filter, Tri-X @ ISO 200, Film Photography Project FPP-76 1+1:
https://live.staticflickr.com/65535/53301768218_a95c6298ce_b.jpg
Leica M4-2 Voigtlander 50 2.5 Color Skopar LTM, 022 filter, Tri-X @ ISO 200, Film Photography Project FPP-76 1+1:
https://live.staticflickr.com/65535/53331392404_0aa8ecb072_b.jpg
Those are great tones between black and gray, but my roll did not have that . Just a bland gray throughout. Nice photos.
skylight1b wrote
johnld wrote
I mistakenly shot a roll of Tri X and left the ISO at 200 from a previous roll of Portra 400 and proceeded to over expose just a wee bit more as I do with Portra. I developed the Tri X @ 400 iso in Ilfosol 3 for 7.5 min. at approximately 68-70f and the negs came out with this sublime soft contrast and grain. Not much in regards to using the zone system, but an interesting aesthetic nonetheless. At first I was like...oh crap, but after scanning, I don't hate it. I was using an EOS 1V and EF 35mm 1.4.M4-2, Voigtlander 35 1.4 Nokton Classic SC V2, 022 filter, Tri-X @ ISO 200, Film Photography Project FPP-76 1+1:
https://live.staticflickr.com/65535/53301768218_a95c6298ce_b.jpg
Leica M4-2 Voigtlander 50 2.5 Color Skopar LTM, 022 filter, Tri-X @ ISO 200, Film Photography Project FPP-76 1+1:
https://live.staticflickr.com/65535/53331392404_0aa8ecb072_b.jpg
Those are great tones between black and gray, but my roll did not have that . Just a bland gray throughout. Nice photos.
Feb 02, 2024 at 09:33 AM
p.1141 #20Post your recent film shots!
adrianb wrote:
Some images shot on Contax 645 and Portra 400, lenses used: Carl Zeiss 80mm F2 planar and Carl Zeiss 35mm F3.5 Distago (unless they were all shot with the 80mm, can't remember)
As soon as I saw the Citroen I knew that was the Zeiss 80mm f/2 and Contax 645. Beautiful rendering. Have you had any reliability issue with the Contax 645?
Some images shot on Contax 645 and Portra 400, lenses used: Carl Zeiss 80mm F2 planar and Carl Zeiss 35mm F3.5 Distago (unless they were all shot with the 80mm, can't remember)
As soon as I saw the Citroen I knew that was the Zeiss 80mm f/2 and Contax 645. Beautiful rendering. Have you had any reliability issue with the Contax 645?
Feb 02, 2024 at 09:41 AM