Post your recent film shots!
p.1130 #1Post your recent film shots!
Nikon FM2n, AI Nikkor 50mm f/1.8S, Kentmere Pan 400, developed in LegacyPro L110 at 1:31 for 5.5 minutes.
2023.07.07 Roll #336-08217-positive.jpg by dourbalistar, on Flickr
2023.07.07 Roll #336-08217-positive.jpg by dourbalistar, on Flickr
Jan 17, 2024 at 11:01 PM
p.1130 #4Post your recent film shots!
Paris, December 2023
Leica M2, LLL 35 8E, HP5 pushed to 1600, Xtol Stock
Leica M2, LLL 35 8E, HP5 pushed to 1600, Xtol Stock
Jan 18, 2024 at 02:33 PM
p.1130 #5Post your recent film shots!
Canon Sure Shot Sleek (32mm 3.5 triplet) + Agfapan APX 100 in Rodinol 1:50
alison profile 3r by Winblad von, on Flickr
Nikon FG + Nikkor 50/1.8 D + Kodak Colorplus 200
sword fern by Winblad von, on Flickr
alison profile 3r by Winblad von, on FlickrNikon FG + Nikkor 50/1.8 D + Kodak Colorplus 200
sword fern by Winblad von, on FlickrJan 18, 2024 at 03:28 PM
p.1130 #6Post your recent film shots!
M6 + Summicron 5cm Collapsible + Cinestill XX
Jan 18, 2024 at 07:53 PM
p.1130 #7Post your recent film shots!
Target shopper hah. MP + 28 Lux + P400
 |
||
 |
||
|
Jan 19, 2024 at 01:16 PM
p.1130 #9Post your recent film shots!
Super Fujica-6 / Kentmere 400 / Rodinal
January by Henry Beckmeyer, on Flickr
January by Henry Beckmeyer, on FlickrJan 19, 2024 at 02:14 PM
p.1130 #10Post your recent film shots!
The first and last frame of the roll have more light leaks than the rest of the roll. Makes me wonder if it is the lab messing up. The last frame especially having more light leaks makes me wonder since this camera auto winds immediately after the last frame is taken. When I asked the owner of the lab he said "my lab techs are the best in the world". 
I did a quick test with a flashlight and couldn't see any light coming in from the front or back of the film back, but who knows. I ran a roll through a new film back and sent to the same lab. So I guess will see.
Also interesting that 120 scans are 19 mp, and 35mm scans are 30mp.
First
Last
I did a quick test with a flashlight and couldn't see any light coming in from the front or back of the film back, but who knows. I ran a roll through a new film back and sent to the same lab. So I guess will see.
Also interesting that 120 scans are 19 mp, and 35mm scans are 30mp.
|
||
 |
||
|
First
|
||
 |
||
|
Last
Jan 19, 2024 at 02:34 PM
|
p.1130 #11Post your recent film shots!
lifeandmylens wrote:
The first and last frame of the roll have more light leaks than the rest of the roll. Makes me wonder if it is the lab messing up. The last frame especially having more light leaks makes me wonder since this camera auto winds immediately after the last frame is taken. When I asked the owner of the lab he said "my lab techs are the best in the world".
I did a quick test with a flashlight and couldn't see any light coming in from the front or back of the film back, but who knows. I ran...Show more →
You need to replace some light seals. I had that too in my Mamiya 645 - new door seals and light leaks are gone. I didn't realize how bad they were until I started pulling the foam (what was left of the foam) out. One of the joys of using 40 year old equipment. There are kits you can get on eBay for almost any camera.
Medium format scans don't need as much data to provide similarly good images as 35mm scans.
The first and last frame of the roll have more light leaks than the rest of the roll. Makes me wonder if it is the lab messing up. The last frame especially having more light leaks makes me wonder since this camera auto winds immediately after the last frame is taken. When I asked the owner of the lab he said "my lab techs are the best in the world".
I did a quick test with a flashlight and couldn't see any light coming in from the front or back of the film back, but who knows. I ran...Show more →
You need to replace some light seals. I had that too in my Mamiya 645 - new door seals and light leaks are gone. I didn't realize how bad they were until I started pulling the foam (what was left of the foam) out. One of the joys of using 40 year old equipment. There are kits you can get on eBay for almost any camera.
Medium format scans don't need as much data to provide similarly good images as 35mm scans.
Jan 19, 2024 at 03:42 PM
p.1130 #12Post your recent film shots!
Oldwino wrote:
lifeandmylens wrote
The first and last frame of the roll have more light leaks than the rest of the roll. Makes me wonder if it is the lab messing up. The last frame especially having more light leaks makes me wonder since this camera auto winds immediately after the last frame is taken. When I asked the owner of the lab he said "my lab techs are the best in the world". I did a quick test with a flashlight and couldn't see any light coming in from the front or back of the film back, but who knows. I ran a roll through a new film back and sent to the same lab. So I guess will see.
Also interesting that 120 scans are 19 mp, and 35mm scans are 30mp.
Medium format scans don't need as much data to provide similarly good images as 35mm scans.
Thanks. There are no foam seals on these backs. There is a rubber one, it looks fine. But who knows.
Jan 19, 2024 at 04:54 PM
p.1130 #13Post your recent film shots!
lifeandmylens wrote:
I did a quick test with a flashlight and couldn't see any light coming in from the front or back of the film back, but who knows. I ran a roll through a new film back and sent to the same lab. So I guess will see.
Also interesting that 120 scans are 19 mp, and 35mm scans are 30mp.You need to replace some light seals. I had that too in my Mamiya 645 - new door seals and light leaks are gone. I didn't realize how bad they were until I started pulling the foam (what was left of the foam) out. One of the joys of using 40 year old equipment. There are kits you can get on eBay for almost any camera.
Medium format scans don't need as much data to provide similarly good images as 35mm scans.Thanks. There are no foam seals on these backs. There is a rubber one, it looks fine. But who knows.
But there is probably a seal inside, at the opening for the dark slide. It should spring back when you remove the dark slide and seal the opening, but when it gets old, it's not so springy. It's a typical fail point of hasselblad backs, and I bet here, too.
You can shoot a roll and leave the dark slide out and tape over the opening with some black tape. If there are no light issues, then that's probably where the problem lies.
Oldwino wrote
lifeandmylens wrote
The first and last frame of the roll have more light leaks than the rest of the roll. Makes me wonder if it is the lab messing up. The last frame especially having more light leaks makes me wonder since this camera auto winds immediately after the last frame is taken. When I asked the owner of the lab he said "my lab techs are the best in the world". I did a quick test with a flashlight and couldn't see any light coming in from the front or back of the film back, but who knows. I ran a roll through a new film back and sent to the same lab. So I guess will see.
Also interesting that 120 scans are 19 mp, and 35mm scans are 30mp.
Medium format scans don't need as much data to provide similarly good images as 35mm scans.
But there is probably a seal inside, at the opening for the dark slide. It should spring back when you remove the dark slide and seal the opening, but when it gets old, it's not so springy. It's a typical fail point of hasselblad backs, and I bet here, too.
You can shoot a roll and leave the dark slide out and tape over the opening with some black tape. If there are no light issues, then that's probably where the problem lies.
Jan 19, 2024 at 05:53 PM
p.1130 #14Post your recent film shots!
rji2goleez wrote:
So how do I have a IIc with and f/2.0 lens?
Either the front lens group, or the entire shutter & lens assembly has been swapped for the original. The IIc was not sold with an f2.0 lens on it. Your camera has been modified.
Does the serial number on the front lens group match the serial number on the front ring of the shutter? If not, only the front lens group has been switched.
So how do I have a IIc with and f/2.0 lens?
Either the front lens group, or the entire shutter & lens assembly has been swapped for the original. The IIc was not sold with an f2.0 lens on it. Your camera has been modified.
Does the serial number on the front lens group match the serial number on the front ring of the shutter? If not, only the front lens group has been switched.
Jan 19, 2024 at 06:42 PM
p.1130 #15Post your recent film shots!
Cozy under the sunset.
Just click for More Pictures!
 |
||
 |
||
|
|
||
 |
||
|
Just click for More Pictures!
Jan 19, 2024 at 08:26 PM
p.1130 #16Post your recent film shots!
RetinaRepair wrote:
Either the front lens group, or the entire shutter & lens assembly has been swapped for the original. The IIc was not sold with an f2.0 lens on it. Your camera has been modified.
Does the serial number on the front lens group match the serial number on the front ring of the shutter? If not, only the front lens group has been switched.
I think you just returned my IIc to me after CLA work. Paul, this is Bob. And I believe you concluded that the entire front element was replaced.
rji2goleez wrote
So how do I have a IIc with and f/2.0 lens?Does the serial number on the front lens group match the serial number on the front ring of the shutter? If not, only the front lens group has been switched.
I think you just returned my IIc to me after CLA work. Paul, this is Bob. And I believe you concluded that the entire front element was replaced.
Jan 20, 2024 at 06:13 AM
p.1130 #17Post your recent film shots!
A few more shots from Prince Rupert, BC. The second one is giving me a bit of a 1980's postcard vibe... M6 + Summicron 5cm Collapsible + Lomo 800
 |
||
 |
||
|
|
||
 |
||
|
|
||
 |
||
|
Jan 20, 2024 at 07:20 PM
p.1130 #18Post your recent film shots!
Bad (or good?) news. Two more rolls were processed from the same camera and film back that previously had light leaks on every frame. Zero light leaks on these. I'm pretty convinced the previous light leaks were from the techs at the lab. Here is one from the new roll.
Mamiya 645AFD + P400.
Mamiya 645AFD + P400.
|
||
 |
||
|
Jan 21, 2024 at 06:27 AM
p.1130 #20Post your recent film shots!
lifeandmylens wrote:
Target shopper hah. MP + 28 Lux + P400
The Portra seems to handle indoor lighting quite well (I expected a green color cast) or did you do color-correction on this one? Great shot.
Target shopper hah. MP + 28 Lux + P400
The Portra seems to handle indoor lighting quite well (I expected a green color cast) or did you do color-correction on this one? Great shot.
Jan 21, 2024 at 08:33 AM