Post your recent film shots!
p.1030 #1Post your recent film shots!
theHUN wrote:
Could be due to a cheap cable release. I have a few that work with some LF lenses but dot'n with others.
Try to find a quality cable release and see if it solves the issue.How do I identify a quality cable release?
Based on a recommendation on Large Format forum I bought one from this german company: https://gebr-schreck.com/
Unfortunately the web site seems to be down, but there is an email address. I understand that this manufacturer supplies the cable releases sold by Linhof. I confirm the one I have looks identical to this one: https://www.linhofstudio.com/products/Cable--Releases-Silvestri-Linhof/Linhof_Profi_Cable_Release_700mm_Disk_Lock
SergeyT wrote
theHUN wrote
Does anyone know if the Fujica G690BLP requires a special cable release? I have two functional bodies, but the cable release I have (which works fine on a GW690II) will not work on either G690BLP. Or is the cable release a common failure point on the BLP?Try to find a quality cable release and see if it solves the issue.
Based on a recommendation on Large Format forum I bought one from this german company: https://gebr-schreck.com/
Unfortunately the web site seems to be down, but there is an email address. I understand that this manufacturer supplies the cable releases sold by Linhof. I confirm the one I have looks identical to this one: https://www.linhofstudio.com/products/Cable--Releases-Silvestri-Linhof/Linhof_Profi_Cable_Release_700mm_Disk_Lock
Jun 18, 2023 at 02:40 PM
p.1030 #2Post your recent film shots!
andrewd01 wrote:
Could be due to a cheap cable release. I have a few that work with some LF lenses but dot'n with others.
Try to find a quality cable release and see if it solves the issue.How do I identify a quality cable release?Based on a recommendation on Large Format forum I bought one from this german company: https://gebr-schreck.com/
Unfortunately the web site seems to be down, but there is an email address. I understand that this manufacturer supplies the cable releases sold by Linhof. I confirm the one I have looks identical to this one: https://www.linhofstudio.com/products/Cable--Releases-Silvestri-Linhof/Linhof_Profi_Cable_Release_700mm_Disk_Lock
Awesome, thanks!
theHUN wrote
SergeyT wrote
theHUN wrote
Does anyone know if the Fujica G690BLP requires a special cable release? I have two functional bodies, but the cable release I have (which works fine on a GW690II) will not work on either G690BLP. Or is the cable release a common failure point on the BLP?Try to find a quality cable release and see if it solves the issue.
Unfortunately the web site seems to be down, but there is an email address. I understand that this manufacturer supplies the cable releases sold by Linhof. I confirm the one I have looks identical to this one: https://www.linhofstudio.com/products/Cable--Releases-Silvestri-Linhof/Linhof_Profi_Cable_Release_700mm_Disk_Lock
Awesome, thanks!
Jun 18, 2023 at 02:48 PM
p.1030 #5Post your recent film shots!
Hasselblad 503cx
Zeiss 80/2.8 CF
Ilford Delta 100 Pro
Tahquitz Canyon Hiker by Graham Gibson, on Flickr
Zeiss 80/2.8 CF
Ilford Delta 100 Pro
Tahquitz Canyon Hiker by Graham Gibson, on Flickr
Jun 19, 2023 at 10:37 AM
p.1030 #7Post your recent film shots!
Roll 100: A digital picture of negatives about to be measured (with the spot meter in the Q2M) to determine the characteristic curve of some expired Acros 100. It turns out to be ISO50 for my process, which was surprising because both Delta 100 and 400 came out to be box speed in previous measurements.
Jun 19, 2023 at 10:44 AM
p.1030 #8Post your recent film shots!
Pentax 6x7 105mm f2.4 Fomapan 100, HC-110 100:1 stand
Jun 19, 2023 at 06:38 PM
p.1030 #9Post your recent film shots!
A photo of my son nearing the top of Black Warm Up Left (V0), Kraft Boulders. Bright midday sun in the Mojave Desert is probably not ideal conditions for my first time trying FOMAPAN 100 Classic. 
Rolleicord V, FOMA FOMAPAN 100 Classic, developed in LegacyPro L110 at 1:31 for 6 minutes.
2023.04.10 Roll #329-07786-Pano-positive.jpg by dourbalistar, on Flickr
Rolleicord V, FOMA FOMAPAN 100 Classic, developed in LegacyPro L110 at 1:31 for 6 minutes.
2023.04.10 Roll #329-07786-Pano-positive.jpg by dourbalistar, on Flickr
Jun 21, 2023 at 12:00 AM
p.1030 #10Post your recent film shots!
Leica M4, CV 35/1.4 Nokton Classic, Portra 160
Scanned with a Fuji XT4 / Nikon 55/2.8 Micro
Large here: https://ibb.co/b2Vx8pX
Scanned with a Fuji XT4 / Nikon 55/2.8 Micro
Large here: https://ibb.co/b2Vx8pX
Jun 21, 2023 at 03:49 PM
|
p.1030 #11Post your recent film shots!
Canon P, Color-Skopar 35/2.5, Ilford XP2
Chocolat Suchard by Brad Hurley, on Flickr
Chocolat Suchard by Brad Hurley, on FlickrJun 21, 2023 at 03:57 PM
p.1030 #12Post your recent film shots!
XP2 with red filter
Pentax 67
SMC Pentax 67 45mm f/4
Edited on Jun 22, 2023 at 06:39 PM · View previous versions
Pentax 67
SMC Pentax 67 45mm f/4
Edited on Jun 22, 2023 at 06:39 PM · View previous versions
Jun 21, 2023 at 07:16 PM
p.1030 #15Post your recent film shots!
Rolleicord V, Kodak 400TX (expired 2018), developed in LegacyPro L110 at 1:31 for 6 minutes.
2023.04.14 Roll #332-07699-Pano-positive.jpg by dourbalistar, on Flickr
2023.04.14 Roll #332-07699-Pano-positive.jpg by dourbalistar, on Flickr
Jun 22, 2023 at 01:00 AM
p.1030 #16Post your recent film shots!
bjhurley wrote:
Canon P, Color-Skopar 35/2.5, Ilford XP2
I love the original LTM 35/2.5
How do you find the frame lines on the P? They are not projected but they are parallax corrected so that has always interested me.
Canon P, Color-Skopar 35/2.5, Ilford XP2
I love the original LTM 35/2.5
How do you find the frame lines on the P? They are not projected but they are parallax corrected so that has always interested me.
Jun 22, 2023 at 02:07 PM
p.1030 #17Post your recent film shots!
ottokbre wrote:
I love the original LTM 35/2.5
How do you find the frame lines on the P? They are not projected but they are parallax corrected so that has always interested me.
I like that lens too; I have the Canon 35/1.8 LTM and love it, but the focus throw is a lot longer and I find the Color-Skopar faster to focus. And also the Canon is prone to veiling flare, which of course I can't see when I'm shooting with a rangefinder so the Voigtländer is a safer bet.
I am not convinced that my Canon P's framelines are actually parallax-corrected; either some models weren't or mine is defective (or possibly I don't understand how it works). I don't see any movement of the framelines when I'm focusing, even if I swing from minimum distance to infinity with any lens (35, 50, or 100).
The only thing I don't like about the Canon P is the rangefinder patch: it's not very distinct and I find focusing quite challenging in some situations. A friend of mine just gave me an impossible-to-refuse deal on a well cared-for and calibrated Leica M2R with three Leica lenses (35, 50, and 90) all in a package for less than the going price of the 50mm lens (a dual-range Summicron) alone, so I will soon be able to compare the Leica and Canon rangefinder patches.
bjhurley wrote
Canon P, Color-Skopar 35/2.5, Ilford XP2How do you find the frame lines on the P? They are not projected but they are parallax corrected so that has always interested me.
I like that lens too; I have the Canon 35/1.8 LTM and love it, but the focus throw is a lot longer and I find the Color-Skopar faster to focus. And also the Canon is prone to veiling flare, which of course I can't see when I'm shooting with a rangefinder so the Voigtländer is a safer bet.
I am not convinced that my Canon P's framelines are actually parallax-corrected; either some models weren't or mine is defective (or possibly I don't understand how it works). I don't see any movement of the framelines when I'm focusing, even if I swing from minimum distance to infinity with any lens (35, 50, or 100).
The only thing I don't like about the Canon P is the rangefinder patch: it's not very distinct and I find focusing quite challenging in some situations. A friend of mine just gave me an impossible-to-refuse deal on a well cared-for and calibrated Leica M2R with three Leica lenses (35, 50, and 90) all in a package for less than the going price of the 50mm lens (a dual-range Summicron) alone, so I will soon be able to compare the Leica and Canon rangefinder patches.
Jun 22, 2023 at 02:42 PM
p.1030 #18Post your recent film shots!
bjhurley wrote:
I love the original LTM 35/2.5
How do you find the frame lines on the P? They are not projected but they are parallax corrected so that has always interested me.I like that lens too; I have the Canon 35/1.8 LTM and love it, but the focus throw is a lot longer and I find the Color-Skopar faster to focus. And also the Canon is prone to veiling flare, which of course I can't see when I'm shooting with a rangefinder so the Voigtländer is a safer bet.
I am not convinced that my Canon P's framelines are actually parallax-corrected; either some models weren't or mine is defective (or possibly I don't understand how it works). I don't see any movement of the framelines when I'm focusing, even if I swing...Show more →
My Canon P did not have auto parallax correct. And yeah, the indistinct RF blob is one reason why I sold it. I figured why would I ever use it if I had a Leica M? Don't get me wrong - it's great if that is your budget. I think I paid $150 about 5 years ago for one that was in perfect/wrinkle free shutter curtain shape. It makes the Soviet RF cameras seem like a very very poor choice. But after shooting a roll through it, I knew I wouldn't use it again.
ottokbre wrote
bjhurley wrote
Canon P, Color-Skopar 35/2.5, Ilford XP2How do you find the frame lines on the P? They are not projected but they are parallax corrected so that has always interested me.
I am not convinced that my Canon P's framelines are actually parallax-corrected; either some models weren't or mine is defective (or possibly I don't understand how it works). I don't see any movement of the framelines when I'm focusing, even if I swing...Show more →
My Canon P did not have auto parallax correct. And yeah, the indistinct RF blob is one reason why I sold it. I figured why would I ever use it if I had a Leica M? Don't get me wrong - it's great if that is your budget. I think I paid $150 about 5 years ago for one that was in perfect/wrinkle free shutter curtain shape. It makes the Soviet RF cameras seem like a very very poor choice. But after shooting a roll through it, I knew I wouldn't use it again.
Jun 22, 2023 at 03:34 PM
p.1030 #19Post your recent film shots!
OregonSun wrote:
https://live.staticflickr.com/65535/52990094664_38798996aa_o.jpg
Love these shots. What film was used?
https://live.staticflickr.com/65535/52990094664_38798996aa_o.jpg
Love these shots. What film was used?
Jun 22, 2023 at 03:37 PM
p.1030 #20Post your recent film shots!
Desmolicious wrote:
Love these shots. What film was used?
All three of those were XP2, I only labeled the first one
Forgot to mention these were all with a red filter.
I love how smooth that film is, especially the whites. The blacks get muddy quick if you underexpose too much though.
Love these shots. What film was used?
All three of those were XP2, I only labeled the first one
Forgot to mention these were all with a red filter.I love how smooth that film is, especially the whites. The blacks get muddy quick if you underexpose too much though.
Jun 22, 2023 at 06:25 PM