Post your recent film shots!
p.1023 #3Post your recent film shots!
bjhurley wrote:
Canon P, Canon 50/1.4 LTM, Ilford FP4+
https://live.staticflickr.com/65535/52934623746_d298a13b75_c.jpgCruising in Vieux-Montréal by Brad Hurley, on Flickr
Looks well metered to me! Nice!!
EOS 1V + Tamron 35-150 + Tmax 400
Canon P, Canon 50/1.4 LTM, Ilford FP4+
https://live.staticflickr.com/65535/52934623746_d298a13b75_c.jpgCruising in Vieux-Montréal by Brad Hurley, on Flickr
Looks well metered to me! Nice!!
EOS 1V + Tamron 35-150 + Tmax 400
May 29, 2023 at 05:15 PM
p.1023 #4Post your recent film shots!
helimat wrote:
Looks well metered to me! Nice!!
Thanks! It was actually underexposed by about three stops, but I was able to rescue it in post. This exercise has given me a new appreciation for the amount of flexibility in JPEG files; I didn't realize I could push them this far. I have two more rolls coming from the lab this week that were also underexposed and hopefully I'll be able to lift a few keepers from the mud. I'm using a different meter now that closely matches what I get from my digital camera and a phone app, so I feel a lot more confident now.
Looks well metered to me! Nice!!
Thanks! It was actually underexposed by about three stops, but I was able to rescue it in post. This exercise has given me a new appreciation for the amount of flexibility in JPEG files; I didn't realize I could push them this far. I have two more rolls coming from the lab this week that were also underexposed and hopefully I'll be able to lift a few keepers from the mud. I'm using a different meter now that closely matches what I get from my digital camera and a phone app, so I feel a lot more confident now.
May 29, 2023 at 06:13 PM
p.1023 #5Post your recent film shots!
bjhurley wrote:
Thanks! It was actually underexposed by about three stops, but I was able to rescue it in post. This exercise has given me a new appreciation for the amount of flexibility in JPEG files; I didn't realize I could push them this far. I have two more rolls coming from the lab this week that were also underexposed and hopefully I'll be able to lift a few keepers from the mud. I'm using a different meter now that closely matches what I get from my digital camera and a phone app, so I feel a lot more confident now.
Wow, I never would have guessed the original was off by that much. Nor that a jpg could be recovered from 3 stops under!
I think you'll find after a while that you will be able to sense if a meter is off... While I don't think I'd be able to nail exposure every single time using the sunny 16 rule, my 'spidey senses' would likely be triggered if a meter suggested a setting that was waaay off.
It gets baked in the subconscious maybe.
Here's a shot with a camera that makes metering a piece of cake! EOS 1V + 85L II + C200
helimat wrote
Looks well metered to me! Nice!!Wow, I never would have guessed the original was off by that much. Nor that a jpg could be recovered from 3 stops under!
I think you'll find after a while that you will be able to sense if a meter is off... While I don't think I'd be able to nail exposure every single time using the sunny 16 rule, my 'spidey senses' would likely be triggered if a meter suggested a setting that was waaay off.
It gets baked in the subconscious maybe. Here's a shot with a camera that makes metering a piece of cake! EOS 1V + 85L II + C200
May 29, 2023 at 07:22 PM
p.1023 #6Post your recent film shots!
Nikon FM2n, AI Nikkor 50mm f/1.8S, Kentmere Pan 400, developed in LegacyPro L110 at 1:31 for 5.5 minutes.
2023.02.23 Roll #325-07761-positive.jpg by dourbalistar, on Flickr
2023.02.23 Roll #325-07761-positive.jpg by dourbalistar, on Flickr
May 30, 2023 at 12:22 AM
p.1023 #7Post your recent film shots!
helimat wrote:
Wow, I never would have guessed the original was off by that much. Nor that a jpg could be recovered from 3 stops under!
I think you'll find after a while that you will be able to sense if a meter is off...
Actually it wasn't 3 stops; I misinterpreted the numbers in the exposure slider in Capture One; they don't actually document what those numbers correspond to but when I looked at the manual it said "steps" and I read it as "stops." I boosted exposure by 3 steps in the exposure slider.
But I agree about developing a spidey sense for exposure -- back when I was a kid, shooting my meterless Kodak Retinette, I got really good at estimating exposure without a meter; I carried a meter with me but rarely had to use it. The brilliant portrait photographer Jane Bown never used a meter and estimated exposure by looking at the light on the back of her hand.
But my Retinette years were a long time ago and I've been using cameras with built-in meters for so long that I've lost that sense; I could start with Sunny 16 although I'd recalculate it for higher shutter speeds since f16 is off-limits for most of my lenses due to diffraction.
Wow, I never would have guessed the original was off by that much. Nor that a jpg could be recovered from 3 stops under!
I think you'll find after a while that you will be able to sense if a meter is off...
Actually it wasn't 3 stops; I misinterpreted the numbers in the exposure slider in Capture One; they don't actually document what those numbers correspond to but when I looked at the manual it said "steps" and I read it as "stops." I boosted exposure by 3 steps in the exposure slider.
But I agree about developing a spidey sense for exposure -- back when I was a kid, shooting my meterless Kodak Retinette, I got really good at estimating exposure without a meter; I carried a meter with me but rarely had to use it. The brilliant portrait photographer Jane Bown never used a meter and estimated exposure by looking at the light on the back of her hand.
But my Retinette years were a long time ago and I've been using cameras with built-in meters for so long that I've lost that sense; I could start with Sunny 16 although I'd recalculate it for higher shutter speeds since f16 is off-limits for most of my lenses due to diffraction.
May 30, 2023 at 03:21 AM
p.1023 #8Post your recent film shots!
helimat wrote:
Do you have a stash of ProImage 100? Or do you have a source? It seems like it's made of unobtainium of late
I have a small stash. It briefly came in stock at B&H a year or so back and I was on the notification list.
Do you have a stash of ProImage 100? Or do you have a source? It seems like it's made of unobtainium of late
I have a small stash. It briefly came in stock at B&H a year or so back and I was on the notification list.
May 30, 2023 at 10:03 AM
p.1023 #9Post your recent film shots!
Hasselblad 503cx
Zeiss 80/2.8 CF
Cinestill 50D
Joshua Tree Cacti by Graham Gibson, on Flickr
Cacti Exam by Graham Gibson, on Flickr
Zeiss 80/2.8 CF
Cinestill 50D
Joshua Tree Cacti by Graham Gibson, on Flickr
Cacti Exam by Graham Gibson, on Flickr
May 30, 2023 at 10:48 AM
p.1023 #10Post your recent film shots!
Mamiya C330 + 105/f3.5 + Kodak Portra 400
The first roll with a "new" camera
000018720001
000018720003
000018720002
000018720011
The first roll with a "new" camera
000018720001
000018720003
000018720002
000018720011
May 30, 2023 at 08:08 PM
|
p.1023 #11Post your recent film shots!
Rolleicord V, Kodak 400TX (expired 2018), developed in LegacyPro L110 at 1:31 for 6 minutes.
2023.04.14 Roll #332-07695-Pano-positive.jpg by dourbalistar, on Flickr
2023.04.14 Roll #332-07695-Pano-positive.jpg by dourbalistar, on Flickr
May 30, 2023 at 10:00 PM
p.1023 #12Post your recent film shots!
olegkin wrote:
Mamiya C330 + 105/f3.5 + Kodak Portra 400
The first roll with a "new" camera
https://live.staticflickr.com/65535/52939058603_3f8cc8b50d_b.jpg
000018720001
https://live.staticflickr.com/65535/52938008157_8f95e90593_b.jpg
000018720003
https://live.staticflickr.com/65535/52938605831_0c07d360dd_b.jpg
000018720002
https://live.staticflickr.com/65535/52938995250_53b8fd8698_b.jpg
000018720011
Congrats on the new camera! Excellent portraits.
Mamiya C330 + 105/f3.5 + Kodak Portra 400
The first roll with a "new" camera
https://live.staticflickr.com/65535/52939058603_3f8cc8b50d_b.jpg
000018720001
https://live.staticflickr.com/65535/52938008157_8f95e90593_b.jpg
000018720003
https://live.staticflickr.com/65535/52938605831_0c07d360dd_b.jpg
000018720002
https://live.staticflickr.com/65535/52938995250_53b8fd8698_b.jpg
000018720011
Congrats on the new camera! Excellent portraits.
May 30, 2023 at 11:40 PM
p.1023 #13Post your recent film shots!
helimat wrote:
Konica Genba Kantoku DD + Superia 400
Nice results! First I’ve seen with this Konica. Exposure and lens looks great.
I think there were four different types? Crazy looking zoom model w huge cyclops flash. Your DD with switchable 40/60 teleconverter lens. A 35mm model, and a 28.
Konica Genba Kantoku DD + Superia 400
Nice results! First I’ve seen with this Konica. Exposure and lens looks great.
I think there were four different types? Crazy looking zoom model w huge cyclops flash. Your DD with switchable 40/60 teleconverter lens. A 35mm model, and a 28.
May 30, 2023 at 11:44 PM
p.1023 #14Post your recent film shots!
Desmolicious wrote:
Nice results! First I’ve seen with this Konica. Exposure and lens looks great.
I think there were four different types? Crazy looking zoom model w huge cyclops flash. Your DD with switchable 40/60 teleconverter lens. A 35mm model, and a 28.
I’ve posted shots with it before.
I have the 28 Wide as well, but it is nowhere near as good performer as the DD. Plus 40/60 is quite versatile! I like it so much that I was able to let go of the Klasse S. And it’s waterproof to boot!
helimat wrote
Konica Genba Kantoku DD + Superia 400I think there were four different types? Crazy looking zoom model w huge cyclops flash. Your DD with switchable 40/60 teleconverter lens. A 35mm model, and a 28.
I’ve posted shots with it before.
I have the 28 Wide as well, but it is nowhere near as good performer as the DD. Plus 40/60 is quite versatile! I like it so much that I was able to let go of the Klasse S. And it’s waterproof to boot!May 31, 2023 at 07:04 AM
p.1023 #15Post your recent film shots!
helimat wrote:
Nice results! First I’ve seen with this Konica. Exposure and lens looks great.
I think there were four different types? Crazy looking zoom model w huge cyclops flash. Your DD with switchable 40/60 teleconverter lens. A 35mm model, and a 28.I’ve posted shots with it before. I have the 28 Wide as well, but it is nowhere near as good performer as the DD. Plus 40/60 is quite versatile! I like it so much that I was able to let go of the Klasse S. And it’s waterproof to boot!
Good info on the DD. I just assumed the fixed focal length 28 would be better.
Can u add exposure comp?
Desmolicious wrote
helimat wrote
Konica Genba Kantoku DD + Superia 400I think there were four different types? Crazy looking zoom model w huge cyclops flash. Your DD with switchable 40/60 teleconverter lens. A 35mm model, and a 28.
I have the 28 Wide as well, but it is nowhere near as good performer as the DD. Plus 40/60 is quite versatile! I like it so much that I was able to let go of the Klasse S. And it’s waterproof to boot!Good info on the DD. I just assumed the fixed focal length 28 would be better.
Can u add exposure comp?
May 31, 2023 at 09:08 AM
p.1023 #16Post your recent film shots!
Hasselblad 503cx
Zeiss 80/2.8 CF
Fujifilm Velvia 100
Desert Air by Graham Gibson, on Flickr
Zeiss 80/2.8 CF
Fujifilm Velvia 100
Desert Air by Graham Gibson, on Flickr
May 31, 2023 at 10:41 AM
p.1023 #17Post your recent film shots!
dourbalistar wrote:
This was taken back in 2019, but somehow got buried in my catalog. Recently went back to edit and arrange as a triptych "penorama".
Olympus Pen S, Ultrafine eXtreme 400, developed in LegacyPro L110 at 1:31 for 5.5 minutes.
Nice! I've got the original Pen, which is almost the same camera, and love it.
This was taken back in 2019, but somehow got buried in my catalog. Recently went back to edit and arrange as a triptych "penorama".
Olympus Pen S, Ultrafine eXtreme 400, developed in LegacyPro L110 at 1:31 for 5.5 minutes.
Nice! I've got the original Pen, which is almost the same camera, and love it.
May 31, 2023 at 07:53 PM
p.1023 #20Post your recent film shots!
Hasselblad 503cx
Zeiss 80/2.8 CF
Fujifilm Velvia 100
Joshua Tree National Park by Graham Gibson, on Flickr
Zeiss 80/2.8 CF
Fujifilm Velvia 100
Joshua Tree National Park by Graham Gibson, on Flickr
Jun 01, 2023 at 10:33 AM