Thanks for the comment EOS20.I am a little surprised . I am very happy with this shot I thought I would get a little more feedback is there somthing Im missing here or is there a secret hand shake that I dont know about?
I think that making the entire photo B&W but leaving the ring in color makes it more the subject and not the baby. It seems to twist what you're saying. Since rings on that finger equate with marriage it seems like you're trying to say that you had a baby and thus marriage is the future, instead of the baby itself being the future.
zync wrote:
I think that making the entire photo B&W but leaving the ring in color makes it more the subject and not the baby. It seems to twist what you're saying. Since rings on that finger equate with marriage it seems like you're trying to say that you had a baby and thus marriage is the future, instead of the baby itself being the future.
Thanks for the comment I really didnt look into it that deep I just thought it added a nice touch.I guess you could say the ring could puts emphasis on OUR FUTURE.
i agree with zync totally, the photo would be so perfect if the entire image was Black and white.
nevertheless, this is my favorite wa188 so far, as far as sticking to the meaning and also technical aspects.