This topic is in the 2005 archive. You can read it and like its posts here. It is read only.
Archive 2005#188: dark [future]?
p.1 #1#188: dark [future]?
Will we be condemned to a dark future?
Maybe not! Perhaps there's hope...
Edited by eros on Dec 30, 2005 at 06:31 PM GMT
Maybe not! Perhaps there's hope...
Edited by eros on Dec 30, 2005 at 06:31 PM GMT
Dec 29, 2005 at 04:19 PM
p.1 #4#188: dark [future]?
Wow, great shot, looks like a painting. I'm gonna be hard pressed to compete with that 
Dec 29, 2005 at 06:36 PM
p.1 #5#188: dark [future]?
Fantastic shot, Raul!!
If the "dark" future is this beautiful, I wouldn't worry.
Happy New Year, my friend!
Endre
If the "dark" future is this beautiful, I wouldn't worry.
Happy New Year, my friend!
Endre
Dec 29, 2005 at 11:13 PM
p.1 #6#188: dark [future]?
That's exactly what I would like you to see.
The picture shows something (a refinery) that's helping to make a "dark" future but at the same time I tried to show it the nicest way possible (the hope).
The picture shows something (a refinery) that's helping to make a "dark" future but at the same time I tried to show it the nicest way possible (the hope).
Dec 30, 2005 at 03:49 AM
p.1 #7#188: dark [future]?
This is a beautiful picture Raul, with great colors.
Isn’t funny that this ‘dark future’ picture is the only one in color while all the other five entries so far are black and white?
Happy New Year!
Isn’t funny that this ‘dark future’ picture is the only one in color while all the other five entries so far are black and white?
Happy New Year!
Dec 30, 2005 at 08:22 AM
p.1 #8#188: dark [future]?
great image. You may want to resize it so you don't get disqualified for an image to large. That would be a shame.
rule#2: Your submission MUST have exactly 640 pixels for its longest dimension. (no less, no more)
rule#2: Your submission MUST have exactly 640 pixels for its longest dimension. (no less, no more)
Dec 30, 2005 at 09:41 AM
p.1 #9#188: dark [future]?
rockitman wrote:
great image. You may want to resize it so you don't get disqualified for an image to large. That would be a shame.
rule#2: Your submission MUST have exactly 640 pixels for its longest dimension. (no less, no more)
Thank you for your concern, I did fotget about the size. Thank you!
great image. You may want to resize it so you don't get disqualified for an image to large. That would be a shame.
rule#2: Your submission MUST have exactly 640 pixels for its longest dimension. (no less, no more)
Thank you for your concern, I did fotget about the size. Thank you!
Dec 30, 2005 at 12:32 PM
p.1 #11#188: dark [future]?
Wonderful photo, Raul. So many elements begging for interpretation, none of which force you into any specific interpretation. I particularly like the dialogue between the clouds: numerous smokestacks chugging out their little puffs of steam cannot even hope to compete with the immense and overwhelming clouds produced by the sky. Nature triumphs yet again. Quite a majestic scene.
Dec 31, 2005 at 03:18 AM
p.1 #12#188: dark [future]?
Fantastic shot. The light and colours are both vivid yet subtle. I bet this would look amazing blown up really big.
Jan 02, 2006 at 08:20 AM
p.1 #13#188: dark [future]?
Very good subject but way, way too much post processing and colour manipulation for my taste.
Jan 06, 2006 at 07:15 AM
p.1 #14#188: dark [future]?
That's funny, I only used a CP filter and a long exposure.
Post proccessing was USM.
Post proccessing was USM.
Jan 06, 2006 at 08:20 AM
p.1 #15#188: dark [future]?
minsoaks wrote:
Very good subject but way, way too much post processing and colour manipulation for my taste.
I was going to say about the same thing when I saw the following post (only USM
).
I like it anyway
Very good subject but way, way too much post processing and colour manipulation for my taste.
I was going to say about the same thing when I saw the following post (only USM
).I like it anyway
Jan 08, 2006 at 05:26 AM
p.1 #16#188: dark [future]?
What makes this photo a little strange is the fact that the weather was very cloudy on top, but on the right side the sun was shining intensely.
Its was shooted at almost sunset time.
Its was shooted at almost sunset time.
Jan 08, 2006 at 07:47 AM
p.1 #17#188: dark [future]?
This is an amazing image Raul and i wish you the best of luck with it.
It actually reminds me of something I've seen on a Pink Floyd video.
It actually reminds me of something I've seen on a Pink Floyd video.
Jan 11, 2006 at 11:40 AM
p.1 #20#188: dark [future]?
That is an amazing shot, I love it, great work!
Jan 13, 2006 at 11:53 AM