20Dshooter wrote:
Lalfer, what lens did you use for these shots? The topic of this thread is supposed to be "post your super-wide shots". These don't look wide to me?
wide means wide as far as you can be from the shot.............I'll guess a 17 something..........and soft............)
Lalfer wrote:
wide means wide as far as you can be from the shot.............I'll guess a 17 something..........and soft............)
Wide as in wide-angle, not wide as in the oposite of close-up.
Wide angle (or even not close-up) doesn't have to be soft either. I do find that when you re-size for the web a dash of USM is needed to help correct for the loss of resolution.
This is a most interesting thread. Instead of arguing on the sharpness of the lens we are having, about frong and back focusing, contrast, the miscellaneous merits of exotic lens made by exotic manufacturers, we have pictures one after another, to inspire, to share and to teach.
Does anybody have any city (not necessarily street, but in a city, maybe of a building) shots that are equivalent to 20 and 24mm on full frame (so 12.5 and 15 on 1.6x crop)? I'm trying to figure how wide is wide enough.
Richard
)
