Mike-
That is certainly more drastic in difference, but what's to stop someone from buying a canon copy, testing it, and returning it? If you're going to do a lens comparison, do the best of the best for each, not the "average" of one vs. the "average" of another. I will admit it is more drastic in your second photo, but we know there are sub-par copies floating around...It just sounds a little strange to me that you would be concerned to post samples from each company's best copy you had...
Edited by glowrider on Jun 16, 2005 at 09:01 AM GMT (Reason: ugh, spelling)