fredmiranda.com
Login

Moderated by: Fred Miranda
Username  

  

FM Forums | Post-processing & Printing | Join Upload & Sell

  

Fast Raw Viewer vs Photomechanic

  
 
Donzo98
Offline
• • • • •
Upload & Sell: On
p.1 #1 · Fast Raw Viewer vs Photomechanic


I think I'm going to switch to FRV as Photomechanic is going to require an upgrade with Mac OS 28.

I just upgraded to OS 27 and some of my programs, including PM, didn't work without installing Rosetta... so I did.. and everlasting works fine now.

Thoughts on FRV?




Oct 26, 2026 at 11:50 AM
ruthenium
Offline
• • • •
Upload & Sell: On
p.1 #2 · Fast Raw Viewer vs Photomechanic


I have both Fast Raw Viewer and ApolloOne Photo Video Viewer on a Mac.
It is the latter that I normally use for viewing images, raw, jpegs, etc. - give it a try.
I used Photomechanic in the past, when it didn't require subscription.



Oct 26, 2026 at 11:58 AM
jwpstl
Offline
• • •
Upload & Sell: On
p.1 #3 · Fast Raw Viewer vs Photomechanic


There’s also Fred’s new app.


Oct 26, 2026 at 12:34 PM
Donzo98
Offline
• • • • •
Upload & Sell: On
p.1 #4 · Fast Raw Viewer vs Photomechanic


ruthenium wrote:
I have both Fast Raw Viewer and ApolloOne Photo Video Viewer on a Mac.
It is the latter that I normally use for viewing images, raw, jpegs, etc. - give it a try.
I used Photomechanic in the past, when it didn't require subscription.


Just downloaded FRV... perfect for what I want to use it for

Not paying for PM... after OS 27

Too expensive.




Oct 26, 2026 at 01:26 PM
schlotz
Offline
• • • • •
Upload & Sell: On
p.1 #5 · Fast Raw Viewer vs Photomechanic


FYI, Photo Mechanic ver 2026.2 is universal binary and does not require Rosetta therefore should continue to work in macOS 28.


Oct 26, 2026 at 04:36 PM
Donzo98
Offline
• • • • •
Upload & Sell: On
p.1 #6 · Fast Raw Viewer vs Photomechanic


schlotz wrote:
FYI, Photo Mechanic ver 2026.2 is universal binary and does not require Rosetta therefore should continue to work in macOS 28.


I was using the version before that on 26.5… once I updated to OS 27, it required Rosetta install.



Oct 26, 2026 at 06:44 PM
 


Search in Used Dept. 

mcbroomf
Offline
• • • • •
Upload & Sell: Off
p.1 #7 · Fast Raw Viewer vs Photomechanic


jwpstl wrote:
There’s also Fred’s new app.


I just noticed this yesterday. Anyone tried it? I'm on Win for my desktop (Mac for laptop when I'm away) so I'll need to switch to a Studio before trying it.



Oct 27, 2026 at 04:08 AM
jwpstl
Offline
• • •
Upload & Sell: On
p.1 #8 · Fast Raw Viewer vs Photomechanic


I haven’t tried it and probably won’t. I don’t feel the need is that great and it’s too expensive. There is a thread for discussion though: https://www.fredmiranda.com/forum/topic/1960551/

mcbroomf wrote:
I just noticed this yesterday. Anyone tried it? I'm on Win for my desktop (Mac for laptop when I'm away) so I'll need to switch to a Studio before trying it.




Oct 27, 2026 at 09:07 AM
myotis
Offline
•
Upload & Sell: Off
p.1 #9 · Fast Raw Viewer vs Photomechanic


Donzo98 wrote:
I think I'm going to switch to FRV as Photomechanic is going to require an upgrade with Mac OS 28.

I just upgraded to OS 27 and some of my programs, including PM, didn't work without installing Rosetta... so I did.. and everlasting works fine now.

Thoughts on FRV?



I use FRV as an "editor" launched from PM with Cmd+E.

As a tool for assessing the technical quality of files FRV is excellent, very fast and much more capable than PM. You need to learn the keystrokes to take full advantage of the speed

But PM's strength is in file renaming and file organisation on ingest, along with key wording and captioning. which FRV, in comparison to PM, offers virtually no tools.

For me, FRV couldn't replace PM, but if you just need a powerful file viewer, FRV is an excellent tool.



Oct 27, 2026 at 12:35 PM
Donzo98
Offline
• • • • •
Upload & Sell: On
p.1 #10 · Fast Raw Viewer vs Photomechanic


myotis wrote:
I use FRV as an "editor" launched from PM with Cmd+E.

As a tool for assessing the technical quality of files FRV is excellent, very fast and much more capable than PM. You need to learn the keystrokes to take full advantage of the speed

But PM's strength is in file renaming and file organisation on ingest, along with key wording and captioning. which FRV, in comparison to PM, offers virtually no tools.

For me, FRV couldn't replace PM, but if you just need a powerful file viewer, FRV is an excellent tool.


Yes!! I totally agree with you. My primary use is as a file browser. I can browse through all my folders quickly. I can also cull there, and open straight into Lightroom.

It’s an amazing value!!




Oct 27, 2026 at 01:31 PM
RustyBug
Offline
• • • • • • •
Upload & Sell: On
p.1 #11 · Fast Raw Viewer vs Photomechanic


No experience with ... Apollo One app on Mac ... anybody know anthing about it?

I used to use FastPictureViewer back when I was on Windows, but not available for Mac. AI write up on Apollo One sounds interesting.



Oct 28, 2026 at 06:43 PM
ruthenium
Offline
• • • •
Upload & Sell: On
p.1 #12 · Fast Raw Viewer vs Photomechanic


ApolloOne (Pro) is my primary image viewer. I also have DxO Photolab 10, Capture One, FastRawViewer, RawDigger, and Topaz Photo on this Mac, for different reasons. For viewing and culling I normally use ApolloOne.
I can wholeheartedly recommend ApolloOne. I like this viewer - give it try. ApolloOne offers a 14-day free trial.



Oct 28, 2026 at 07:55 PM







FM Forums | Post-processing & Printing | Join Upload & Sell

    
 

You are not logged in. Login or Register