I have the 600/4, 200-600 and 400-800. I will only consider the 600/6.3 if the image quality including bokeh is much better than the 200-600. When I was on an African safari and later a trip to Vietnam -- the range the 200-600 offered was important. There were times that 600mm was too much. Of course for the bird photos-- would have been nice to have the 400-800mm or. the 600/4 with a TC. The reduced size and weight would definitely be a plus for hiking. Lets see some comparisons..
Standing firm, personally, but I am excited to get our eval copies in at work. It should be a couple of weeks and I think we're getting the 400 first. It sounds like demand for the 600 is high.
freaklikeme wrote:
Standing firm, personally, but I am excited to get our eval copies in at work. It should be a couple of weeks and I think we're getting the 400 first. It sounds like demand for the 600 is high.
EB-1 wrote: freaklikeme wroteStanding firm, personally, but I am excited to get our eval copies in at work. It should be a couple of weeks and I think we're getting the 400 first. It sounds like demand for the 600 is high.Yet the 600/6.3 has lesser IQ than the 400/4.5.
aCuria wrote: EB-1 wrotefreaklikeme wroteStanding firm, personally, but I am excited to get our eval copies in at work. It should be a couple of weeks and I think we're getting the 400 first. It sounds like demand for the 600 is high.Yet the 600/6.3 has lesser IQ than the 400/4.5.
From the reviews so far, the 600 will find a place in my backpack. I shoot primarily landscape, but like to shoot birds if I happen on something interesting. So I can put up with 1 kg in order to have the option to shoot birds.
EB-1 wrote: freaklikeme wroteStanding firm, personally, but I am excited to get our eval copies in at work. It should be a couple of weeks and I think we're getting the 400 first. It sounds like demand for the 600 is high.Yet the 600/6.3 has lesser IQ than the 400/4.5.
EBH
These are eval copies. I think people are anxious to see for themselves.
Hey guys! My local Sony Store already has a demo lens in stock. Such a magical lens—crazy light, it honestly feels like holding a Stanley cup. I feel like I could easily hike 10 miles with this on my back!
I have pre-ordered the 600. I really like the range of the 100-400 4.5 so have no need for the 400 prime. I’m not planning om getting rid of my 600 f4 or Siggy 300-600. I’d prefer to use those but sometimes they’re too big for travel. The 600 6.4 is a real contender for my Antarctica rip in December/january along with the 100-400.
If anything is on the chopping block is my newly acquired 400 2.8.
Will get the 100-400 f/4.5 GM + 600 f/6.3 GM as my new combo and sell my 200-600G and Nikon 400 f/4.5 to fund them.
No interest in the much more expensive 300 GM and gluing a 2x on it almost permanently for my bird work.
I will still complain a little bit though, if they had of announced say 1.3kg 400 f/4 and 600 f/5.6 everyone would still be over the moon on how light they are. I think the prime's should be faster the zooms as the trade-off for loss of flexibility. Based on the pricing of the just released lenses, I expect a 600 f/5.6GM would be same price as Nikon 600 PF and the 400 f/4 ~ $4K.
Oh and no pre-order as I do not pay early adopter tax. Even the 100-400 f/4.5 GM is now $1KAU discount currently in Australia, so I'm glad I waited.
EB-1 wrote:
I would assume they are worse since the samples are cherrypicked. I really want to see if a 1.4x is viable.
EBH
Fabian Fopp showed they are very good with the 1.4x and tested them on real world targets. AF was also still excellent with the 1.4x, but obviously 600 + 1.4 being f/9 is a bit slower than the 400 + 1.4. IQ and AF take a hit with the 2x especially since the 600 is then f/13. But I refuse to use 2x these days so it does not worry me. He still got good shots though and IQ was definitely good if you nailed the focus.
I was ready to pre-order the 600mm to possibly replace my GM 300mm f2.8 (w/converters), when I read a comment from a tester that said the stabilization didn't seem as good as other Sony telephoto primes. That caused me to apply the brakes. I'll, now, just wait until the hype is over from the reviewers that are in the good graces of Sony (where they receive cherry-picked pre-production samples and cannot possibly be completely unbiased). The minimum focus distance is also a concern.
At 79, stabilization has become increasingly important to me, so I do not want any unpleasant surprises. I think I can squeak by with my GM 300 for a little while longer.