p.3 #1 · I Don't Understand the Sony RX10 V Release
RoamingScott wrote:
It's a camera for people that don't post here.
People that want a one-and-done purchase, don't want to faff with removable lenses, and want a LOT of reach in one package. It has a lot of quality of life updates to keep the body and physical interfaces modern. Mostly granddads that post their mediocre bird photos on Facebook because they like going outside more than they like developing their photography skills, and a lot of dads from the Far East, the guys that hit the human tripod pose in front of the Eiffel Tower who want a one and done travel camera.
It's a great deal for those guys, vs trying to pull a MILC system together....Show more →
You are correct!!! It's not for the people post here. It is for the spouses of people who post here.
It is the camera I will buy for my wife having learned that she will SOMETIMES carry this, but she will never carry the APS C or 4/3rds I have bought for here in the past.
p.3 #2 · I Don't Understand the Sony RX10 V Release
Choderboy wrote:
Such a simple equation.
Used RX10IV prices have been high.
So Sony, who has more than a passing interest in making profit, re releases the camera with a few updates and an up price.
Money for (not much more than) nothing.
Agree. While maybe not one of the "cool kids," the strong used market, the utility, etc., I was kind of surprised Sony dropped it as well as wondering why it was taking so long to get a "new" one, too.
p.3 #4 · I Don't Understand the Sony RX10 V Release
My main camera is an A7CR which I use with a lot of great lenses, so my main questions (and I’m sure the question on a lot of our minds) is whether the IQ of this camera will be acceptable. But, this sure looks like a fun camera to try out. I think I’ll get one, play with it for a couple months and if I’m not happy with the results just sell it for a few hundred $ loss.
p.3 #5 · I Don't Understand the Sony RX10 V Release
RoamingScott wrote:
It's a camera for people that don't post here.
People that want a one-and-done purchase, don't want to faff with removable lenses, and want a LOT of reach in one package. It has a lot of quality of life updates to keep the body and physical interfaces modern. Mostly granddads that post their mediocre bird photos on Facebook because they like going outside more than they like developing their photography skills, and a lot of dads from the Far East, the guys that hit the human tripod pose in front of the Eiffel Tower who want a one and done travel camera.
It's a great deal for those guys, vs trying to pull a MILC system together....Show more →
Before I went on my march into FF cameras (had several with top glass now over the last 8 years) I used a RX10MkIV a LOT. I was going all over various State parks like in southern Utah and Yellowstone. The images that generated were highly detailed, noise free and color rich and accurate contrary to your rather snide remarks. I'm willing to say what was not was slanted by a fervent love and admiration of the top tech available. That lens on that RX10 is dang sharp one end to the other. In good light, it can generate a image (for those that have a clue how to use a camera with controls) that on a 38" 4k screen will most cases look NO different than most FF cameras even of today. So I don't know what you're looking at but your rather prejudiced viewpoint is a bit on the strong side if I do say so. Is it the equal of my R5MkII......of course not. But for a heck of a lot of applications (especially travel) it can sure make things a LOT more enjoyable. So calm your attitude down just a bit and not try to shoehorn it's use by seniors trying to shoot birds or soccer moms etc. Steve Perry a very respected birder had near nothing but praise for its uncanny ability to nail focus and overall detail rendered.
p.3 #6 · I Don't Understand the Sony RX10 V Release
When traveling or on a photo trip I carry various kits - APS-c or FF to shoot as appropriate. For general travel my wife shoots with an RX100vi and if wildlife are expected an RX10 IV. But the RX10 V may not be on an upgrade path due to a HUGE oversight that no reviewer I have watched yet caught. The threaded shutter release support is GONE!!
The two most useful non-theatrical reviews for the V have been Steve Perry and Mark Galer. Peace.
p.3 #8 · I Don't Understand the Sony RX10 V Release
RX10, P9** and P1*** all pack very compactly even while not being pocketable. One can take this around everywhere, everyday. You would not get funny looks, questions and be able to snap something interesting if it comes up. All this is relevant for people who normally use serious birding equipment. The point about people who accompany you is another angle altogether.
I would like to have something like this at some point but not this particular release.
p.3 #13 · I Don't Understand the Sony RX10 V Release
Jeff Kott wrote:
My main camera is an A7CR which I use with a lot of great lenses, so my main questions (and I’m sure the question on a lot of our minds) is whether the IQ of this camera will be acceptable. But, this sure looks like a fun camera to try out. I think I’ll get one, play with it for a couple months and if I’m not happy with the results just sell it for a few hundred $ loss.
Of course, the IQ is more than acceptable. You can search up the images yourself, as Sony is reusing an earlier 1" sensor. If people are okay with iPhone photos, why would they be disappointed with the RX10? The problem with FF is that it's too big to bring on vacation. The body clearly isn't the issue as Sony has done a fantastic job miniaturizing components, but lenses are a different matter. I only wish Sony added ISO51,200 or ISO102,400.
p.3 #14 · I Don't Understand the Sony RX10 V Release
traveler wrote:
Before I went on my march into FF cameras (had several with top glass now over the last 8 years) I used a RX10MkIV a LOT. I was going all over various State parks like in southern Utah and Yellowstone. The images that generated were highly detailed, noise free and color rich and accurate contrary to your rather snide remarks. I'm willing to say what was not was slanted by a fervent love and admiration of the top tech available. That lens on that RX10 is dang sharp one end to the other. In good light, it can generate a image (for those that have a clue how to use a camera with controls) that on a 38" 4k screen will most cases look NO different than most FF cameras even of today. So I don't know what you're looking at but your rather prejudiced viewpoint is a bit on the strong side if I do say so. Is it the equal of my R5MkII......of course not. But for a heck of a lot of applications (especially travel) it can sure make things a LOT more enjoyable. So calm your attitude down just a bit and not try to shoehorn it's use by seniors trying to shoot birds or soccer moms etc. Steve Perry a very respected birder had near nothing but praise for its uncanny ability to nail focus and overall detail rendered. ...Show more →
100%. I really wish Sony would have updated the sensor. Not that 20MP is a problem in 2026, but Sony should either increase the ISO range or find a way to incorporate the 50MP 1" sensors from smartphones into this. I really do hope that we'll see a RX10 VI in the future.
p.3 #15 · I Don't Understand the Sony RX10 V Release
Lindrelt wrote:
When traveling or on a photo trip I carry various kits - APS-c or FF to shoot as appropriate. For general travel my wife shoots with an RX100vi and if wildlife are expected an RX10 IV. But the RX10 V may not be on an upgrade path due to a HUGE oversight that no reviewer I have watched yet caught. The threaded shutter release support is GONE!!
The two most useful non-theatrical reviews for the V have been Steve Perry and Mark Galer. Peace.
Are they video reviews?
I'm a spec guy as much as anyone here, but FF is too big for vacation. APS-C is my preferred format at the moment since I feel M4/3 has fallen behind. I really wish Sony or someone would design a new system around a 1" sensor. Nikon tried and failed more than a decade ago.
p.3 #17 · I Don't Understand the Sony RX10 V Release
lsquare wrote:
Of course, the IQ is more than acceptable.
Of course, “acceptable” for who and for what? I do feel that my RX100vii photos let me down for a lot of uses (for many uses they were fine) and it’s the same sensor.
p.3 #19 · I Don't Understand the Sony RX10 V Release
Jeff Kott wrote:
Of course, “acceptable” for who and for what? I do feel that my RX100vii photos let me down for a lot of uses (for many uses they were fine) and it’s the same sensor.
As far as I can tell, it hasn't been confirmed if it's using the RX100 VII's sensor or the RX10 IV's sensor. They're both different.
Definitely user error. I think this sensor has been reviewed to death since its introduction more than a decade ago. You can Google up sample images, and I think they can speak for themselves.
