fredmiranda.com
Login

Moderated by: Fred Miranda
  New fredmiranda.com Mobile Site
  New Feature: SMS Notification alert
  New Feature: Buy & Sell Watchlist
  

FM Forums | Sony Forum | Join Upload & Sell

1       2       3              5              end
  

Official: Sony A7RVI and Sony FE 100-400mm f/4.5 GM OSS

  
 
mudlake
Offline
• • • • •
Upload & Sell: On
p.6 #1 · Official: Sony A7RVI and Sony FE 100-400mm f/4.5 GM OSS


chiron wrote:
In my experience shooting family gatherings and children and taking cameras traveling into museums, markets, and on the street, especially at night, using electronic shutter with a camera other than an A1xx or A9xx results in unexpectedly ruined pictures from two sources: LED lights and subject distortion when a moderately moving subject is close to the lens and/or occupies a large part of the frame.

This will certainly vary for different people and shooting styles, but for me it means I have mostly given up using silent shutter on my A7CR bodies. This is a loss, but I still like the
...Show more

You stated the case perfectly. I've resolved to wait until the A1III comes out (hopefully with a global shutter) and then bite the bullet and purchase it. I can't imagine needing to buy another camera after that one. The only thing my A7r5 lets me down on is the read-out speed which hampers silent shooting in museums and on the street. The A1III should be the "be all end all" camera for me. Hopefully...



May 15, 2026 at 04:41 PM
Steve Spencer
Offline
• • • • • • •
Upload & Sell: On
p.6 #2 · Official: Sony A7RVI and Sony FE 100-400mm f/4.5 GM OSS


chiron wrote:
In my experience shooting family gatherings and children and taking cameras traveling into museums, markets, and on the street, especially at night, using electronic shutter with a camera other than an A1xx or A9xx results in unexpectedly ruined pictures from two sources: LED lights and subject distortion when a moderately moving subject is close to the lens and/or occupies a large part of the frame.

This will certainly vary for different people and shooting styles, but for me it means I have mostly given up using silent shutter on my A7CR bodies. This is a loss, but I still like the
...Show more

You should wait and see how the A7r Vi (and presumably the A7Cr II with the same sensor) works in those situations. The electronic shutter in that camera is 5 times faster than the electronic shutter in the A7Cr, but the electronic shutter in the A1/A1 II is 4.3 times faster than the one in the A7r VI. So big differences between each of the three types of cameras in sensor scan speed and therefore ability to use the electronic shutter.



May 15, 2026 at 04:55 PM
chiron
Offline
• • • • •
Upload & Sell: On
p.6 #3 · Official: Sony A7RVI and Sony FE 100-400mm f/4.5 GM OSS


Steve Spencer wrote:
You should wait and see how the A7r Vi (and presumably the A7Cr II with the same sensor) works in those situations. The electronic shutter in that camera is 5 times faster than the electronic shutter in the A7Cr, but the electronic shutter in the A1/A1 II is 4.3 times faster than the one in the A7r VI. So big differences between each of the three types of cameras in sensor scan speed and therefore ability to use the electronic shutter.


I agree that it will be better than the other R bodies. But there has been at least one report of intermittent banding and rolling shutter effects, though I think these were at a professional sports venue where both the LED lights and the speed of subject motion are hard tests.

I'll be interested to see what people find. But the thing I can't stand is the uncertainty about whether what I am shooting will be ruined. So the criterion for using silent shutter is high. That is what makes me stick to mechanical shutter with the A7CR.

I do wish Sony or someone would make a real photographer's camera. Their division between sports and landscape cameras is forcing a dichotomy where none really exists, except at the extremes of shooting interests and styles.



May 15, 2026 at 05:55 PM
gocolts
Offline
• • • •
Upload & Sell: On
p.6 #4 · Official: Sony A7RVI and Sony FE 100-400mm f/4.5 GM OSS


For those whose needs match the strengths of this camera, I can see this being a no-brainer choice. I shoot a lot of field sports, portraits, and travel, which means I'm sticking with the A1 & A7cR combo. Been juggling 2 bodies for 15 years and never have I had a combo as complete and complementary as these 2 for my needs.

That 100-400 4.5 is a different story though. Problem is it'd marginalize my 70-200 2.8 mkii, which has been indispensable to me, especially with a 1.4TC. For now I'll resist.



May 15, 2026 at 07:43 PM
schlotz
Offline
• • • • •
Upload & Sell: On
p.6 #5 · Official: Sony A7RVI and Sony FE 100-400mm f/4.5 GM OSS


Agreed, I too suspect snapsy will be doing some testing.


May 15, 2026 at 09:50 PM
patotts
Offline
• • • •
Upload & Sell: Off
p.6 #6 · Official: Sony A7RVI and Sony FE 100-400mm f/4.5 GM OSS


chiron wrote:
In my experience shooting family gatherings and children and taking cameras traveling into museums, markets, and on the street, especially at night, using electronic shutter with a camera other than an A1xx or A9xx results in unexpectedly ruined pictures from two sources: LED lights and subject distortion when a moderately moving subject is close to the lens and/or occupies a large part of the frame.

This will certainly vary for different people and shooting styles, but for me it means I have mostly given up using silent shutter on my A7CR bodies. This is a loss, but I still like the
...Show more

I mean, that is the dream, which most of us has been asking for, for many years. But that would kill sales of all other models in the line up.

I doubt Sony will ever put a really nice and bright EVF into the a7C series, then it would overlap too much with the a7V and a7RV/VI, especially if the also added the 4-way tilt screen.

One can dream...



May 16, 2026 at 04:14 AM
chiron
Offline
• • • • •
Upload & Sell: On
p.6 #7 · Official: Sony A7RVI and Sony FE 100-400mm f/4.5 GM OSS


patotts wrote:
I mean, that is the dream, which most of us has been asking for, for many years. But that would kill sales of all other models in the line up.

I doubt Sony will ever put a really nice and bright EVF into the a7C series, then it would overlap too much with the a7V and a7RV/VI, especially if the also added the 4-way tilt screen.

One can dream...


I'm not sure I disagree with you, but as a committed optimist I hope you are wrong! Sony will probably put the new battery in the A7CRII, so that will make the grip a tad larger. That shouold give them room to improve the EVF and the IBIS a bit. The limitation for me will still be the slowish sensor readout of 1/50th a sec. The A9 is about 1/150th and that does reliably eliminate banding and rolling shutter in my experience. With the A1xx series at 1/256yh of a sec, I personally have never had a problem with silent shutter under any lights. But I doubt the A7CRII will be reliably useable under LED lighs.

But the A7CR is the closest that Sony has come to making a camera that is a real photographer's camera, by which I mean a camera for someone who is taking a broad range of pictures and who does not need high FPS or a large size for sports, BIF, and large lenses and who wants gear that is discreet and easy to carry. Leica-like, but with all the modern tech.

It is surprising to me that no one has done this. It is actually the place that Sony started out with mirrorless, but they wandered away.

The A7CRII under mechanical shutter may be about as good as it gets for the next 5 years. One shouldn't complain too much!



May 16, 2026 at 06:01 AM
ramesesthe2nd
Offline
• • •
Upload & Sell: Off
p.6 #8 · Official: Sony A7RVI and Sony FE 100-400mm f/4.5 GM OSS


I recently picked up the Nikon Zf, and now my A7RIV feels noticeably smaller in the hand, and the X100VI almost feels like a simple point and shoot. I have big hands, so the size of the Zf feels great to me, but it definitely changes how you see other cameras. Sony bodies really are on the smaller side, even in their non-C lineup.


May 16, 2026 at 06:18 AM
Fred Miranda
Offline
Admin
Upload & Sell: On
p.6 #9 · Official: Sony A7RVI and Sony FE 100-400mm f/4.5 GM OSS


ramesesthe2nd wrote:
I recently picked up the Nikon Zf, and now my A7RIV feels noticeably smaller in the hand, and the X100VI almost feels like a simple point and shoot. I have big hands, so the size of the Zf feels great to me, but it definitely changes how you see other cameras. Sony bodies really are on the smaller side, even in their non-C lineup.


I often complained that Sony bodies were getting bigger with every release, and up to a certain point that was true. The original Sony A7 and A7R were incredibly small for full frame cameras, and even today I'm still amazed at how good they were for their time.

Then the A7R II came out. It was noticeably larger, with a deeper grip, but it added so many important features that I never really minded. It still felt compact.

As Sony started attracting more shooters from Nikon, Canon, Leica, and other systems, the feedback shifted heavily toward ergonomics. Sony listened. The grips became deeper, the bodies slightly thicker to fit more hardware, and that trend continued from there.

But, even after all these changes, Sony bodies are still the smallest feature rich full frame bodies available. Cameras like the Leica SL series, Nikon bodies, including the Nikon Zf that I personally love, Canon, etc., are generally larger and heavier with only rare exceptions for cameras without EVF.

I still prefer smaller cameras, which is why I am glad Sony made the C series. Right now my favorite bodies are the Sony A7CR and the A7R II. Most people will understand the A7CR choice, but probably not the A7RII because of its age. Still, that camera was way ahead of its time. The 42MP sensor is still excellent today, the body size to grip ratio is about perfect, and it still supports the playmemories apps. I know I'm in the minority there, but I actually use them, especially smooth reflections for serious landscape work.



May 16, 2026 at 10:15 AM
Douglas L
Offline
• • • • •
Upload & Sell: On
p.6 #10 · Official: Sony A7RVI and Sony FE 100-400mm f/4.5 GM OSS


Fred Miranda wrote:
I often complained that Sony bodies were getting bigger with every release, and up to a certain point that was true. The original Sony A7 and A7R were incredibly small for full frame cameras, and even today I'm still amazed at how good they were for their time.

Then the A7R II came out. It was noticeably larger, with a deeper grip, but it added so many important features that I never really minded. It still felt compact.

As Sony started attracting more shooters from Nikon, Canon, Leica, and other systems, the feedback shifted heavily toward ergonomics. Sony listened. The grips
...Show more

I missed the smooth reflection app, Fred. I was sort of dreaming that the A7RVI would have an internal ND filter. I am no engineer, not sure if that's even possible for full frame cameras. I remember some smaller Sony P&S cameras have that feature.



May 16, 2026 at 10:25 AM
 


Search in Used Dept. 

rhawidantas
Offline
• •
Upload & Sell: Off
p.6 #11 · Official: Sony A7RVI and Sony FE 100-400mm f/4.5 GM OSS


I also enjoyed the Playmemories but when Sony introduced timelapse on their cameras I decided to do it manually (with some command line tools) to replicate it.



















And then I started doing averaged timelapses. Results can be really dreamy.

https://photos.smugmug.com/photos/i-3tphcMK/0/MV2jqzWQQzPpTJDmWGLpQssbnNRKLLpWkttjR9LtH/1280/i-3tphcMK-1280.mp4

https://photos.smugmug.com/photos/i-BR3LnHT/0/M6LdZmdrVbfnKnZWDLQhCWxztDSjwSGqphh4kpQRV/1280/i-BR3LnHT-1280.mp4

https://photos.smugmug.com/photos/i-6s4D9wP/0/MGtVsG4XR69ZB2Pp9fZBGNG5Nzc47WCnwdRFGqrJT/1280/i-6s4D9wP-1280.mp4



May 16, 2026 at 10:46 AM
rbf_
Offline
• • •
Upload & Sell: Off
p.6 #12 · Official: Sony A7RVI and Sony FE 100-400mm f/4.5 GM OSS


Fred Miranda wrote:
Still, that camera was way ahead of its time. The 42MP sensor is still excellent today, the body size to grip ratio is about perfect, and it still supports the playmemories apps. I know I'm in the minority there, but I actually use them, especially smooth reflections for serious landscape work.


I thought the apps like play memories/smooth reflections apps were pretty cool as well. They probably just thought that that with battery life/computational constraints of a camera but that these types of operations were likely better off done in post. In camera focus stacking would be a pretty cool feature as well but there's not been many camera companies(Olympus) willing to go there either.



May 16, 2026 at 11:14 AM
Arka
Offline
• • • • • •
Upload & Sell: On
p.6 #13 · Official: Sony A7RVI and Sony FE 100-400mm f/4.5 GM OSS


Ross Martin wrote:
Your A1 still has the advantage of a fast sensor readout speed of 3.8ms, compared to the A7RVI at 19.6ms, so your A1 will produce noticeably less rolling shutter and virtually no distortion when shooting fast moving subjects using the electronic shutter. Also, your A1 does 120fps for AF calculations, wheres the A7RVI is half that at 60fps.


This is helpful. Thanks so much!



May 21, 2026 at 04:48 PM
SaberArtori
Online

Upload & Sell: Off
p.6 #14 · Official: Sony A7RVI and Sony FE 100-400mm f/4.5 GM OSS


How noticeable is the 120 af calculations versus 60? Looking to upgrade from a a7cii for birding so either would be an upgrade. Just not sure if the a1ii is worth it for $800 more used than a new a7rvi. Also shooting on the sigma 300-600 so probably already lower iq than a native sony lens.


May 21, 2026 at 04:54 PM
Douglas L
Offline
• • • • •
Upload & Sell: On
p.6 #15 · Official: Sony A7RVI and Sony FE 100-400mm f/4.5 GM OSS


Colby Brown, Sony Ambassador, who appeared with the Sony execs on the stage at the A7RVI launch, just wrote this:

"My Thoughts on the Sony a7R VI for Wildlife...
Hey @everyone! Now that the dust has settled from the a7R VI launch last week, I feel it is time to jump in here and share some thoughts as someone who has been using the camera for the last 2-3 months. So many YT reviews are either run by people that don't shoot wildlife, or even if they do, they only had the camera for a few days (sometimes just a few hours) before rushing out their videos last week.
For those who don't know me, my name is Colby Brown, and I have been shooting professionally for nearly 23 years. I used to work for Nat Geo and now own my own photography/production companies, as well as a Photo Tour company. I have been a Sony Artisan for over 11 years, originally moving over to Sony from working with Canon back in the day.
I think it is best to share my thoughts as bullet points so you can address them more easily...
- No, the a7R VI is NOT going to replace the A1, A1 II or any of the a9 bodies (I, II, or III) cameras in terms of being a flagship camera for Sony.
- No, the release of the R VI does not automatically make your a1 or a1 II obsolete or lacking in any way 😉
- The a7R VI is a VASTLY improved camera for the R series of bodies when it comes to speed and AF
- The a7R VI is capable of shooting fast-moving subjects, such as birds in flight (Purple Martins, Barn Swallows, Terns, Red-winged Blackbirds...and others), but your keeper rate will be higher with the a1 or a1 II. Why? Because of the sensor readout speed. The a1 and a1 II can check the AE/af calculation 120 times per second, while the a7R VI is limited to a maximum of 60 times per second. The end result is a sticker and a more accurate AF system in the A1 series.
- While rolling shutter is still an issue with the R VI, the new stacked sensors are more than fast enough for any of the wildlife I photographed over the last three months. In theory, I think only Humming Birds might be an issue, but this camera should be able to handle everything else without any visual effects for wildlife.
- The R VI feels like it acquires subjects a touch faster than my pair of A1 IIs, which is probably thanks to the latest AI processor for AF.
- At 67 MP, the R VI offers 34% more MP than the a1 or a1 II, which can be a big deal for some photographers. I sure enjoyed the extra crop in ability during my time with the camera, especially with the smaller birds.
- The Buffer on the R VI (assuming you are using the fastest CF Express Cards) clears pretty quick, allowing you to shoot in bursts, pause for a second, and still have plenty of buffer left (but the a1 has a faster/longer buffer)
- The R VI has improved Color Science over the a1 series, plus the new AI processor, which has the ability to take into account tone and white balance, scanning your scene for the various tones and making small adjustments in AUTO WB mode. The results are among the best colors and tones I have seen out of the camera from Sony.
- The new batteries, while a pain with any new generation, are vastly better than the Z100 batteries. With the new grip, I was easily able to shoot all day with my a7R VI. New batteries are smaller but last longer and have a much better design for efficiency. I personally can't wait until all my bodies have this new battery.
- For me, I will keep my two A1 II's and my A9 III, but I will be adding the R VI to my gear bag. On trips where I know that resolution and cropping will be important, I will bring this body. In the past, this would mean a huge sacrifice in AF capabilities (with the R V, for example), but this is much less of an issue now. However, when I need to prioritize speed and AF accuracy with fast-moving subjects, my pair of A1 IIs is still my go-to for the foreseeable future. But if you only have 1 a1 II, the Sony a7R VI is a fantastic second body for wildlife photographers."

The A7RVI is better than the A1II in many aspects, just not in fast actions stuff. I think it's an amazing package. One just needs to know its limitations and shoot accordingly.



May 21, 2026 at 05:03 PM
swldstn
Offline
• • • •
Upload & Sell: On
p.6 #16 · Official: Sony A7RVI and Sony FE 100-400mm f/4.5 GM OSS


Douglas L wrote:
Colby Brown, Sony Ambassador, who appeared with the Sony execs on the stage at the A7RVI launch, just wrote this:

"My Thoughts on the Sony a7R VI for Wildlife...
Hey @everyone! Now that the dust has settled from the a7R VI launch last week, I feel it is time to jump in here and share some thoughts as someone who has been using the camera for the last 2-3 months. So many YT reviews are either run by people that don't shoot wildlife, or even if they do, they only had the camera for a few days (sometimes just a few
...Show more

So when Colby Brown says the A7RVI is a fantastic second body for wildlife photographers is he ruling out Birds in Flight?
That’s what is not clear to me. Can some one comment on this. Thank you.



May 21, 2026 at 07:24 PM
Douglas L
Offline
• • • • •
Upload & Sell: On
p.6 #17 · Official: Sony A7RVI and Sony FE 100-400mm f/4.5 GM OSS


swldstn wrote:
So when Colby Brown says the A7RVI is a fantastic second body for wildlife photographers is he ruling out Birds in Flight?
That’s what is not clear to me. Can some one comment on this. Thank you.


He said hummingbird may be an issue. He and other reviewers said the A1II for fast actions yields higher keeper rate because of its higher AF calculations/second. In the youtube video of the Chinese reviewer that I posted earlier, he also said he still goes for the A1II if he is shooting fast stuff. He had the A7RVI for 5 weeks. Not that the A7RVI can't shoot that kind of stuff, the A1II is just better for that, based on what's reported. I may get one when good discount is available just to play around to see it for myself.



May 21, 2026 at 08:35 PM
James Burden
Offline
• • •
Upload & Sell: On
p.6 #18 · Official: Sony A7RVI and Sony FE 100-400mm f/4.5 GM OSS


Having been on a couple of Colby's photo workshops lately I would say that while Colby is a Sony Artisan he is primarily his own entity and would never sugar coat anything to push a new product toward something it could not do...skill overcomes tech every time. Shooting side by side in Costa Rica with equal equipment, his in focus capture rate and anticipation skills gave him a distinct advantage even though I also had an A1 II.....if the cameras were so automatic that we couldn't fail would we still do it? I didn't preorder the VI but I will when the dust settles just to have the added crop ability/pre-capture over the V..... 🤷🏼‍♂️


May 21, 2026 at 08:57 PM
duncangr
Offline
• •
Upload & Sell: Off
p.6 #19 · Official: Sony A7RVI and Sony FE 100-400mm f/4.5 GM OSS


swldstn wrote:
So when Colby Brown says the A7RVI is a fantastic second body for wildlife photographers is he ruling out Birds in Flight?
That’s what is not clear to me. Can some one comment on this. Thank you.


Birds in Flight has a pretty broad range of possible subjects.

Given the camera has a readout speed in a similar range as the Canon R5 you can expect it will perform in a similar manner.

The R5 was fine for most medium to large birds but any small fast bird (humming birds, chats, wrens, honeyeaters, sparrows, parrots, stints, etc.) will almost certainly have distorted wing, heads or bodies depending on how they are moving at the time the image is taken.

You will also probably see distortion on things like herons heads when they are striking prey or on their beaks when tossing the prey items and rapidly opening and closing their beaks.

If you are panning fast then trees and grass in the background will appear unnaturally slanted.

So - understand the limitations and shoot accordingly.

Of course many won't and there will no doubt be lots of complaints.



May 22, 2026 at 04:03 AM
1       2       3              5              end






FM Forums | Sony Forum | Join Upload & Sell

1       2       3              5              end
    
 

Welcome back
Log in to your account