Weekly Assignment 1215 winner: adventure_photo
p.1 #1Weekly Assignment 1215 winner: adventure_photo
|
Congratulations to adventure_photo for winning WA 1215, based on the theme: Pairs.
The top five photos displayed below, will also be showcased on our Winners Gallery.
Voting is now open for the WA 1216 winners.
Cast your vote!
Weekly Assignment 1217 just started with theme: "Railroad Cars"
Deadline: February 11th noon - Participate!
1st place · adventure_photo with 21 votes 
A pair of skis
 |
||
 |
||
|
2nd place · Danpbphoto with 10 votes
THE HEIRS
|
||
 |
||
|
3rd place · chad hites with 5 votes
The perfect pair!
|
||
 |
||
|
Feb 04, 2026 at 06:00 AM
p.1 #2Weekly Assignment 1215 winner: adventure_photo
Congratulation Scott for a fine entry, and others participated!
Sreedhar.
Sreedhar.
Feb 04, 2026 at 08:22 AM
p.1 #3Weekly Assignment 1215 winner: adventure_photo
guywithgas wrote:
Congratulation Scott for a fine entry, and others participated!
Sreedhar.
Thank you Sreedhar! Thanks to everyone who participates and keeps these challenges so engaging!
Congratulation Scott for a fine entry, and others participated!
Sreedhar.
Thank you Sreedhar! Thanks to everyone who participates and keeps these challenges so engaging!
Feb 04, 2026 at 08:48 AM
p.1 #4Weekly Assignment 1215 winner: adventure_photo
Awesome shot Scott! You had my vote! 
Feb 04, 2026 at 08:57 AM
p.1 #5Weekly Assignment 1215 winner: adventure_photo
Well done Scott! A fitting entry for Winter!
Congrats to ALL who participated!
Dan
Congrats to ALL who participated!
Dan
Feb 04, 2026 at 09:39 AM
|
p.1 #6Weekly Assignment 1215 winner: adventure_photo
Danpbphoto wrote:
Well done Scott! A fitting entry for Winter!
Congrats to ALL who participated!
Dan
Ok, it's time for me to ask you Dan. What is your photo about?
Sreedhar.
Well done Scott! A fitting entry for Winter!
Congrats to ALL who participated!
Dan
Ok, it's time for me to ask you Dan. What is your photo about?
Sreedhar.
Feb 04, 2026 at 10:19 AM
p.1 #7Weekly Assignment 1215 winner: adventure_photo
guywithgas wrote:
Congrats to ALL who participated!
DanOk, it's time for me to ask you Dan. What is your photo about?
Sreedhar.
I wanted to enter something not instantly recognized as a "pair".
There was an "art" display at my local conservatory. Pieces of art were placed in various parts of the indoor greenhouse/conservatory...
This was a "pair" of art objects...I looked up the definition of "pair"..and saw this.."an article consisting of two joined or corresponding parts not used separately..." The key word for me was "not used separately"....The gold frame made the 2 separate art objects a "pair" , and "joined" ...enclosed (not used separately)by the highly ornate gold frame...making them "not separate."
My comment about "heirs v. pairs" was just a play on words.
Initially there were 2 nude clay busts of a man and a woman. I was going to use that "pair" but I found that although the busts (molds)are a "pair" they are separate and not "enclosed" with some confines(a picture frame).
It might not make any sense to others but in my "warped" olde mind...it was a pair.
The objects themselves were quite unique and made up of many separate parts that were "paired" with the 2 objects inside the frame.
Make sense Sreedhar? If not ...no worry...I am olde but not dead..yet. A long path to the posted image right?
You asked!
...That is FINE!!! 
Dan
Danpbphoto wrote
Well done Scott! A fitting entry for Winter!Congrats to ALL who participated!
Dan
Sreedhar.
I wanted to enter something not instantly recognized as a "pair".
There was an "art" display at my local conservatory. Pieces of art were placed in various parts of the indoor greenhouse/conservatory...
This was a "pair" of art objects...I looked up the definition of "pair"..and saw this.."an article consisting of two joined or corresponding parts not used separately..." The key word for me was "not used separately"....The gold frame made the 2 separate art objects a "pair" , and "joined" ...enclosed (not used separately)by the highly ornate gold frame...making them "not separate."
My comment about "heirs v. pairs" was just a play on words.
Initially there were 2 nude clay busts of a man and a woman. I was going to use that "pair" but I found that although the busts (molds)are a "pair" they are separate and not "enclosed" with some confines(a picture frame).
It might not make any sense to others but in my "warped" olde mind...it was a pair.
The objects themselves were quite unique and made up of many separate parts that were "paired" with the 2 objects inside the frame.
Make sense Sreedhar? If not ...no worry...I am olde but not dead..yet.
A long path to the posted image right? You asked!
...That is FINE!!! Dan
Feb 04, 2026 at 01:11 PM
p.1 #8Weekly Assignment 1215 winner: adventure_photo
Danpbphoto wrote:
Congrats to ALL who participated!
DanOk, it's time for me to ask you Dan. What is your photo about?
Sreedhar.I wanted to enter something not instantly recognized as a "pair".
There was an "art" display at my local conservatory. Pieces of art were placed in various parts of the indoor greenhouse/conservatory...
This was a "pair" of art objects...I looked up the definition of "pair"..and saw this.."an article consisting of two joined or corresponding parts not used separately..." The key word for me was "not used separately"....The gold frame made the 2 separate art objects a "pair" , and "joined" ...enclosed (not used separately)by the highly ornate gold frame...making them "not separate."
My comment about "heirs v. pairs" was just a play on...Show more →
Dan, thanks for the detailed explanation. Very much appreciated. The reason I asked was, your word play. That definitely threw me off
Sreedhar.
guywithgas wrote
Danpbphoto wrote
Well done Scott! A fitting entry for Winter!Congrats to ALL who participated!
Dan
Sreedhar.
There was an "art" display at my local conservatory. Pieces of art were placed in various parts of the indoor greenhouse/conservatory...
This was a "pair" of art objects...I looked up the definition of "pair"..and saw this.."an article consisting of two joined or corresponding parts not used separately..." The key word for me was "not used separately"....The gold frame made the 2 separate art objects a "pair" , and "joined" ...enclosed (not used separately)by the highly ornate gold frame...making them "not separate."
My comment about "heirs v. pairs" was just a play on...Show more →
Dan, thanks for the detailed explanation. Very much appreciated. The reason I asked was, your word play. That definitely threw me off
Sreedhar.
Feb 04, 2026 at 03:19 PM
p.1 #9Weekly Assignment 1215 winner: adventure_photo
guywithgas wrote:
Congrats to ALL who participated!
DanOk, it's time for me to ask you Dan. What is your photo about?
Sreedhar.I wanted to enter something not instantly recognized as a "pair".
There was an "art" display at my local conservatory. Pieces of art were placed in various parts of the indoor greenhouse/conservatory...
This was a "pair" of art objects...I looked up the definition of "pair"..and saw this.."an article consisting of two joined or corresponding parts not used separately..." The key word for me was "not used separately"....The gold frame made the 2 separate art objects a "pair" , and "joined" ...enclosed (not used separately)by the highly ornate gold frame...making them "not separate."
My comment about "heirs v. pairs" was just a play on words.
Initially there were 2 nude clay busts of a man and a woman. I was going to use that "pair" but I found that although the busts (molds)are a "pair" they are separate and not "enclosed" with some confines(a picture frame).
It might not make any sense to others but in my "warped" olde mind...it was a pair.
The objects themselves were quite unique and made up of many separate parts that were "paired" with the 2 objects inside the frame.
Make sense Sreedhar? If not ...no worry...I am olde but not dead..yet. A long path to the posted image right?
You asked!...That is FINE!!!
DanDan, thanks for the detailed explanation. Very much appreciated. The reason I asked was, your word play. That definitely threw me off
Sreedhar.
Your request was fine brother! No problem. Happy to explain my "thought process", however screwed up it may appear to others..
I sometime like to add some humor into the forum and my posts.
Dan
Danpbphoto wrote
guywithgas wrote
Danpbphoto wrote
Well done Scott! A fitting entry for Winter!Congrats to ALL who participated!
Dan
Sreedhar.
There was an "art" display at my local conservatory. Pieces of art were placed in various parts of the indoor greenhouse/conservatory...
This was a "pair" of art objects...I looked up the definition of "pair"..and saw this.."an article consisting of two joined or corresponding parts not used separately..." The key word for me was "not used separately"....The gold frame made the 2 separate art objects a "pair" , and "joined" ...enclosed (not used separately)by the highly ornate gold frame...making them "not separate."
My comment about "heirs v. pairs" was just a play on words.
Initially there were 2 nude clay busts of a man and a woman. I was going to use that "pair" but I found that although the busts (molds)are a "pair" they are separate and not "enclosed" with some confines(a picture frame).
It might not make any sense to others but in my "warped" olde mind...it was a pair.
The objects themselves were quite unique and made up of many separate parts that were "paired" with the 2 objects inside the frame.
Make sense Sreedhar? If not ...no worry...I am olde but not dead..yet.
A long path to the posted image right? You asked!
...That is FINE!!! Dan
Sreedhar.
Your request was fine brother! No problem. Happy to explain my "thought process", however screwed up it may appear to others..
I sometime like to add some humor into the forum and my posts.
Dan
Feb 05, 2026 at 10:24 AM