fredmiranda.com
Login

Moderated by: Fred Miranda
  New fredmiranda.com Mobile Site
  New Feature: SMS Notification alert
  New Feature: Buy & Sell Watchlist
  

FM Forums | City, Street & Architecture | Join Upload & Sell

       2       end
  

What makes of an architecture or landscape an engaging one?

  
 
GiovanniAprea
Offline
• • •
Upload & Sell: Off
p.1 #1 · What makes of an architecture or landscape an engaging one?


I gotta admit that if there is anything like "an eye" for photography I sure miss the one for street and landscape, especially the latter, no matter how I try, gear, filters, exposure, weather conditions bla bla bla I just can't seem to find anything engaging in my results, somebody likes them but I can't find a wow factor into them.

I live in a beautiful spot and being the off season very long I used to entertain myself with landscape and our beloved now passed dog, been going to the same places over and over as I had the final result in my mind but never really got to achieve what I wanted and as such discharging it, also got used to beauty and that's another reason I can't see anything worth in those images; I been visiting the US and took a few shots along the journey, some architecture, some landscape, mostly cliche things so, again, I fall into the meh factor...

Would somebody tell me what makes of an architectural or landscape image an engaging one?

Grazie



This is one I have been working on for a month or so, 300 steps to climb after every attempt and I still think I didn't achieve what I had pictured in my mind:




An image I like for the geometry but still leaving me a meh feeling:




Again the place where I live, the rocks in the background being a recognisable trademark, for sure an abused subject where I question myself at how, if possible, to take a "different" shot of the same scene:




First time in San Francisco, crossed the Golden Gate dozens and dozens of times and still look at it as it was the first time in total awe and marvel, couldn't skip the chance to go up there and take my shot, I gotta admit I like it but it sure is one out of a million same and better than mine:




My second time in NYC, second in a 4 months time span, first time for my son, first day the fog was so thick that most of the high rises tops were not visible, it sure added some drama but how do you take a worth to hang on a wall shot of such a subject?





Apologise for the many questions and nonsense, just looking to improve in this never ending field photography being



Jan 31, 2026 at 02:16 PM
Dragonfire
Offline
• • • • •
Upload & Sell: On
p.1 #2 · What makes of an architecture or landscape an engaging one?


Might I suggest you take up painting.


Jan 31, 2026 at 04:20 PM
GiovanniAprea
Offline
• • •
Upload & Sell: Off
p.1 #3 · What makes of an architecture or landscape an engaging one?


I am even worse than photography with drawing/painting, I can do well painting my boat mahogany or my house walls but I can't even read my calligraphy, go figure painting...


Jan 31, 2026 at 04:35 PM
keepclicking
Offline
• • • •
Upload & Sell: On
p.1 #4 · What makes of an architecture or landscape an engaging one?


Giovanni, you live in Capri one of the most amazing locations and there are tons of stuff to shoot there. I like what you have capture, especially the first image. I spent 3 days in Capri from Sorrento and enjoyed photographing Church San Michele. I will share some images from my visit to Capri.



Jan 31, 2026 at 05:45 PM
RWNPhoto
Offline
• • •
Upload & Sell: On
p.1 #5 · What makes of an architecture or landscape an engaging one?


The B&W building up in to the clouds is the winner here, to me anyway.


Jan 31, 2026 at 08:47 PM
Danpbphoto
Offline
• • • • • • •
Upload & Sell: On
p.1 #6 · What makes of an architecture or landscape an engaging one?


Ciao fratello!
Fotografie davvero meravigliose quelle che mostri qui! Sì, vivi in ​​una zona che ho visitato molte volte, dato che la casa della famiglia di mia madre si trovava a Serrastretta nel Sud Italia. Il mio italiano non è molto buono, dato che tutti i familiari di mia madre sono venuti a mancare. Che tristezza!

I hope you and members don't mind my trying to remember Italian grammer! Yes I had to "cheat" on a few words..
Ciao Giovanni!
Dan



Feb 01, 2026 at 12:10 PM
GiovanniAprea
Offline
• • •
Upload & Sell: Off
p.1 #7 · What makes of an architecture or landscape an engaging one?


Dan it is always a pleasure to read your Italian, thank you for the effort, you do very well and feel free to communicate in Italian as much as you like, I always appreciate both the effort and the comments

Buona domenica a tutti

Giovanni



Feb 01, 2026 at 04:56 PM
Danpbphoto
Offline
• • • • • • •
Upload & Sell: On
p.1 #8 · What makes of an architecture or landscape an engaging one?


GiovanniAprea wrote:
Dan it is always a pleasure to read your Italian, thank you for the effort, you do very well and feel free to communicate in Italian as much as you like, I always appreciate both the effort and the comments

Buona domenica a tutti

Giovanni

Grazie mille!
Dan




Feb 02, 2026 at 11:48 AM
akashyap
Offline
• • •
Upload & Sell: On
p.1 #9 · What makes of an architecture or landscape an engaging one?


These are all really good! They display strong 'compositional techniques' typically associated with "good photography" IMO. Some of these compositional techniques include:

- Framing (your first image has incredible framing to highlight the rock. I might just darken the frame to focus on the subject rock)
- Negative Space (Image #3 has nice negative space for the beautiful water and colorful sky)
- Leading Lines (picture #2, in addition to having nice frames, also has a leading line from the bottom right to the center of the image. I also like the pastel like colors)

Other techniques could include the rule of thirds, having an interesting foreground / subject / background (Depth to an image), symmetry, golden ratio.

I think you might also be a bit hard / critical on yourself. It's hard to compare our work with other's work, especially on social media, where people have different levels of experience, equipment, and time to release the images we see.




Feb 02, 2026 at 11:54 AM
GiovanniAprea
Offline
• • •
Upload & Sell: Off
p.1 #10 · What makes of an architecture or landscape an engaging one?


I do really appreciate your comments and especially the part where I am a bit hard at myself which is true to all of my activities, grazie!!!

The images above where achieved after several attempts, the first one took me ages and it still isn't what I look forward to with regards to light and color cast, I took several, clear skies, clouds, rough seas, calm seas... that's the nice thing about photography, the subject might be the same but it always look different, it's a process.

The framing if king of obligated, I think this is shot at the wides end of the 14-24, centering the background rock is matter of inches left-right back-front, then all about luck...

I like the image with the pillars, again not easy to almost align horizon and architecture but it is quite compelling, again several attempts and the nicest memories with my dog witnessing the process.

As stated here and there it takes to go back to own footprints after a while to figure how to do it better, no matter what but, again, it's a process.

Grazie ancora, it is a goog boost to try and do better


Giovanni



Feb 02, 2026 at 03:16 PM
 


Search in Used Dept. 

OregonSun
Offline
• • • •
Upload & Sell: Off
p.1 #11 · What makes of an architecture or landscape an engaging one?


Nothing wrong with these, compositions are great, the 2nd has some great colors and light, and the last has a cool mysterious feel to it.

I agree it can be a struggle to make interesting or unique landscapes and city/architecture photos.

Some things that have helped me is to focus more on unique weather or lighting conditions and re-visiting lesser known local spots (I'm also lucky to live somewhere with abundant natural beauty).

I often will try to capture something that makes the photo stand out as an actual moment in time, like motion or something inherently impermanent.

Here are a few examples:


A local hiking trail right on the edge of town that is often at the top of the fog boundary in the winter. Through repeated attempts, I've become pretty good at forecasting these conditions.






Just a bank downtown, but I really liked how the holiday window decorations give it some life.






An example of capturing some motion, I didn't realize the splash would mimic the shape of the clouds when I took the shot.





Feb 02, 2026 at 09:59 PM
Kevner
Offline
• •
Upload & Sell: Off
p.1 #12 · What makes of an architecture or landscape an engaging one?


Greetings Giovanni,

You have stated your own problem, your familiarity with your surroundings. To your credit, you are not satisfied with your own images which is a key to continued growth. You might try a little more contrast in your processing, but overall you have some very nice images. So, what can you do differently? For me, I do a couple things. First off, I have a series of lenses that I purchased with the intent of using them differently. They are all budget friendly but have inherent flaws that inspire me to shoot familiar subjects in a new way. I would suggest you try shooting at different times of the day. Try shooting at night. What do your seascapes look like in strong moon light? Try shooting with very shallow depths of field, how would this affect a sea scape. When I'm stuck, that's one of the first things I do, change the time of day. Last, try different subject matters. Maybe landscapes aren't the thing that really works for you. Or, maybe different kinds of landscapes. You might discover something about how you want to approach photography.

Good luck! - Kk



Feb 03, 2026 at 07:34 PM
RustyBug
Offline
• • • • • • •
Upload & Sell: On
p.1 #13 · What makes of an architecture or landscape an engaging one?


GiovanniAprea wrote:
Would somebody tell me what makes of an architectural or landscape image an engaging one?

Grazie

how, if possible, to take a "different" shot of the same scene:

one out of a million same and better than mine:

how do you take a worth to hang on a wall shot of such a subject?


Questions ^


looking to improve in this never ending


Statement ^




Imo, the matter is rooted in the kinds of questions you are asking. To me, they are asking questions about comparatives to others.
Early in our journey these are very typical questions. Few folks bypass these kinds of questions, early in their journey. BUT, at some point, you need to kick these kinds of questions to the curb if you want to achieve your statement proposition.


I'll interject my .02 that your images aren't the issue. It is your perspective about your images (not meaning the perspective of the capture, rather your attitude / perspective ABOUT the images) that needs adjusted to "improve".


As long as you are comparing yourself to others, you'll always find yourself feeling like you come up short in some regard or another. The sooner you "QUIT THAT" ... the better.


We often here the mention of a photographer (or other artist) having their "voice". Basically, what is it you want to say (or show / convey) to your viewer? Which, btw your audience can be an sum total of one person (yourself), or it can. be a variety of others.

Knowing who your audience is ... and what you want to say / convey to them ... that is what makes your "improved" (imo), when you achieve that.

For instance, if you know you want to convey the dichotomy of color or scale about a scene ... and you present that in a way that folks realize that very dichotomy, then you have presented YOUR VOICE. If you want to convey the moodiness of a dreary day ... and you do that, then again, you have presented YOUR VOICE.

But, before you can present YOUR VOICE, you have to ask yourself what it is that you want to convey. That is a vastly different thing from comparing your images to someone else's images.


Folks can offer all kinds of little tips / tricks ... different lenses, different time of day, different angles, etc. BUT, that's just an exercise in trying to somehow be different. The bottom line is that the ability to be different ... ummm, there's 10,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000 images out there in the last 3.2 seconds. Do you REALLY think you can come up with something that is so unique and different that it will withstand the scrutiny of comparative to the universe of images, by trying to be different? Instead, try to be YOU, and that is when YOUR difference reveals itself (even it's not that different) ... because it is attached to YOU.


Rather, when you KNOW what you want to convey (insert telephone game), it gives you framework to your voice.


Been a while, but the telephone game goes like this:

Your out there and your best friend is NOT with you. You pick up your phone and call them, "Dude, you gotta see this !!! The color / shape / mood / scale, tones / vibrance / weirdness (attribute of your choice) is amazing, serene, sublime, massive (adjective of your choice). I wish you were here ... you'd FEEL xyz (emotive) about being here. I wish you could experience this with me."

Okay, a bit of hyperbole ... but, you'll notice that NONE of that was about a comparative to anyone or any image. Instead, it was all about what YOU wanted to SHOW your friend. Period.

Some folks have their formulaic approach to how they construct their "masterpieces" ... derived straight out of the pages of "Outdoor Photography" (old school magazine era). But, while there are plenty of tips / techniques ... they work BEST when you harness them to YOUR voice, not as a copycat of what others have done. Nor, as an exercise in being different for the sake of being different.



First we learn to emulate. Then, we learn to create.



Creation comes from what your crafted in your mind as your desired goals to convey YOUR voice, YOUR message ... YOUR pic. Trying to be Bresson, trying to be Adams ... nah. BE GIOVANNI.

That said, you have a nice set. I dig on a few of them.

But if it is not satisfying to you, it is likely because you are trying to emulate others, moreover than deliver YOUR voice. If you don't know what you want to say, then you're just making noise in your mind's assessment of your work (why your dissatisfaction accrues) ... and, that doesn't have the same satisfaction as delivering YOUR message.

Others will dissent and still reference tips, tricks, techniques, composition, et al ... but, those are the tools you have available to craft your voice. Kinda like the alphabet is the tools, for crafting words, that craft sentences, that convey a message. You have to know what you want to say ... it's your voice.

HTH




Feb 03, 2026 at 09:09 PM
GiovanniAprea
Offline
• • •
Upload & Sell: Off
p.1 #14 · What makes of an architecture or landscape an engaging one?


Rusty,

thank you for taking such time to reply to my Hamlet like doubts, I do really appreciate.

I think of myself as a pretty decent portrait photographer, a bit I learned to use my gear, another bit I learned to use light and a good share of the results is due to the interaction with the subject which plays, very much probably, the biggest role.

Landscape wise I never really dove that deep inside it, it must have to do with my "FOV", I seem I can't really make it from 50mm below, I always seem to fall between 35 and 120 with a sweet spot between 50 and 85 which is probably due to the fact I own a few lenses in that range and that I spent quite some time experimenting with them.

I entertain myself in the offseason with landscape as that's almost the only thing to do, for me, where I live, since I lost my dog I also lost the interest in that field of photography but once in a while I think of some result I want to achieve and I go and try, as you and others mentioned I am a bit hard at myself and hyper critical so I don't see anything special but many people appreciate the results, it is a good exercise at getting better and, no, I don't compare with anybody, I learned a while ago, when I started running to loose extra weight and then to compete that it is pointless to compete against others, I just want to raise my bar higher, I don't feel the need to pursue other people's results no matter the field of action.

Grazie so much for attending the thread with your exhaustive response.

Giovanni



Feb 04, 2026 at 12:32 AM
RustyBug
Offline
• • • • • • •
Upload & Sell: On
p.1 #15 · What makes of an architecture or landscape an engaging one?


First off, you're welcome.

Second, I think your notion regarding which FOV / Focal lengths ... sounds a bit like you have an expectation(s) of what you should be doing (based on what others may have done ).

Me, I hear ya ... I was never a 50mm guy back in the day. I rolled with a 28 and a 75-150. 300 + 2X for long stuff, but my point is that I can appreciate your 50-85 "sweet" spot matching my preference (even today) for the 75.

So, yeah we do get a certain comfortability ... or, maybe a diff way is a body of experience with a given tool (i.e. lens / focal length). If that is indeed, how we "see" and "present" the world to others ... To thine own self be true. ROCK IT your way. No worries about how others play.

Bottom line is you do you ... whatever, however, whenever, wherever that is. Your skills and eye are already plenty good ... It's those internal things (self-doubt / voice) that are your nemesis (imo) now. . And, yeah, those can be tough ones to tackle sometimes, but knowing is the start to conquering them ... you got this.




Feb 04, 2026 at 07:54 AM
Kevner
Offline
• •
Upload & Sell: Off
p.1 #16 · What makes of an architecture or landscape an engaging one?


Giovanni (and RustyBug),

I hope this doesn't sound like I'm fully disagreeing with RustyBug, but I want to provide some added thoughts based on my 30+ years as a professor of architecture, design, and theory. In times of personal difficulty in the creative arts whether you want to call it a creative block, lack of vision, or whatever, the most important thing you can do is to experiment rather than focus on refinement. This is born out throughout the history of the arts. Experimentation is the only way you can broaden your skills base and vision (not philosophical vision but literal vision). As an instructor, I often used sports analogies. Sticking to only learning by refining is the same as practicing only a right handed layup in basketball and then not knowing what to do when it's always getting blocked. Like you, the majority of my photography occurs within a very familiar landscape. For me, experimentation begins with changing equipment, changing time of day, and sometimes subject matter. This builds up your mental library of what you can achieve and helps see the familiar in a new way. Experimentation relieves the mental pressure of expected outcomes. It lowers the perceives risk of failure and allows you to enjoy the creative process. That's my two cents worth.



Feb 04, 2026 at 12:40 PM
StoneCrop
Offline
• •
Upload & Sell: Off
p.1 #17 · What makes of an architecture or landscape an engaging one?


I mean, quite frankly there is a lot of boring landscape and street photography out there. Plenty of well composed and nicely colored photos like that can remain in a realm detached from human experience and emotion, like some dumb idealized 19th century landscape painting.

Is there anywhere you go that makes you feel something emotional or tactile or visceral or brings back memories that are charged with meaning, or speaks to you of your dreams? If not, maybe you don’t have so much that you’re trying to convey and so you don’t end up with any sort of purpose guiding you other than a sense to make something pretty. If you do have places that make you feel those ways, then spend time in them, soak up those feelings as deeply as you can, and then try to recreate and express those feelings. Maybe you’ll end up shooting in harsh midday sun and pushing the contrast way beyond what is reasonable, instead of waiting for blue hour and using HDR, because it gets you closer to the feeling of intensity you are trying to express. It may not be pretty, but it might create an experience in the viewer, different from their everyday experience, and that is a much greater purpose of art than to try to make a pretty thing in nature be a pretty thing in two dimensions, without any of the other senses to actually capture the embodied experience of it. Maybe you can’t even capture the feeling of the space you go to, but you can try to make photos of other places express that same feeling, or you can go back another time with the intention to create an image, rather than to capture an image. Maybe the photo that ends up moving you will be soft, blurry, colorless and grainy, and it will be the one that sticks in your memory and haunts you later when you’re trying to sleep or nags at you when you are trying to balance the books and whispers thoughts in your mind…

Or maybe that’s just all a red herring and in refuting it you come closer to what you actually want.

If there are any examples of these sorts of photos taken by others that deeply speak to you, point us to them And maybe we can help identify what you’re actually wanting to create and offer suggestions that won’t just help you make slightly prettier pretty things.



Feb 06, 2026 at 03:39 AM
RustyBug
Offline
• • • • • • •
Upload & Sell: On
p.1 #18 · What makes of an architecture or landscape an engaging one?


Just thinking about where folks have mentioned shaking things up a bit with using a different focal length. These were from a 500mm outing.

Nothing spectacular, per se ... but they were just a matter of what was catching my attention. Shot for an audience of one, maybe. Shot for an audience of others, maybe. But, they were about what caught my attention, vs. trying to emulate what others might have done (or not).

So, I'm not opposed to experimentation, not at all. But, I do advocate that your work be internal to you ... vastly, moreover than comparative with others. I still feel like the point of liberation for you will be once you fully let go of the "what others" do.



Kent Southers 2024

  LEICA SL2-S    500mm F5.6 DG DN OS | Sports 024 lens    500mm    f/7.1    1/50s    500 ISO    -2.0 EV  





Kent Southers 2024

  LEICA SL2-S    500mm F5.6 DG DN OS | Sports 024 lens    500mm    f/7.1    1/160s    100 ISO    -2.0 EV  





Kent Southers 2024

  LEICA SL2-S    500mm F5.6 DG DN OS | Sports 024 lens    500mm    f/7.1    1/50s    200 ISO    -2.0 EV  




Feb 06, 2026 at 07:50 AM
Taperwing
Offline
• •
Upload & Sell: On
p.1 #19 · What makes of an architecture or landscape an engaging one?


Since you asked, here are my comments on the first two images, as they struck me as having possibilities.

First, it good to be able to live close, such that you can go back and keep working on these images. IMO, on image 1, the unexciting light, and flatness of the sea work against it. There is no energy, or visual tension. For some reason, I find the lack of focus of the left foreground works against the much sharper focus of the right foreground. The tighness of the foreground crop around the distant feature also seems claustrophobic. Finally, I would push the foreground 0.5-1.0 stops lower (darker).

Some suggestions, try earlier or later in the day, perhaps when the sky is more dynamic with cloud or storm features. Maybe too when the sea is in a more angry state. Try a slightly wider lens, and move a touch forward such that the distant rocky feature has some breathing room, and the foreground takes up less of the frame. Try both symmetrical and asymmetrical placements of the feature in the foreground frame. If you want all of the foreground in focus, you might have to focus stack. Due to the flatness of the sea, I'm guessing you used a longer exposure here. If the sea is more lively, you may want to try some shorter exposures too. Finally, your image begs for a bit more processing, particullarly pushing the foreground a bit darker. And just because I'm a B&W junkie, I would try the image in monochrome.

In my opinion, the second image has real possibilities. Here, the softness of the light on the foreground works well with the softness of the sea, which I am guessing is from a longer exposure. I would try a longer lens, possibly moving a bit right, to see if you can remove the piece of distant sea mount, which I find distracting intruding into the right foreground frame. On this image, a featureless blue sky, contrasing with the soft features of the sea, from an extended image, might make for a peaceful image. Again, maybe try more towards dawn or dusk.

Anymore, most of my photography is restricted to times when I travel. And during those times, I have made very, very few interesting color images in light more than a couple hours past dawn or prior to sunset, other than times when the lighting is quite moody due to weather. Incredibly energetic cloud and storm activity quite helped my captures in the Highlands of Scotland (Example). That image wouldn't work with a featureless sky. For midday work, I have had much better luck playing in B&W with my infrared converted camera.

Happy shooting and all the best.



Feb 06, 2026 at 08:48 AM
GiovanniAprea
Offline
• • •
Upload & Sell: Off
p.1 #20 · What makes of an architecture or landscape an engaging one?


Taperwing wrote:
Since you asked, here are my comments on the first two images, as they struck me as having possibilities.

IMO, on image 1, the unexciting light, and flatness of the sea work against it. There is no energy, or visual tension. For some reason, I find the lack of focus of the left foreground works against the much sharper focus of the right foreground. The tighness of the foreground crop around the distant feature also seems claustrophobic. Finally, I would push the foreground 0.5-1.0 stops lower (darker).

Happy shooting and all the best.


Ciao,

With regards to that photo, I think I already explained this, the Sun sets in a favourable position only for a couple months a year, when I took it I had the urge to take and print to get it to a friend for his birthday and so I did, I left PhotoShop handle the align and masking but it was plain horrible, you commented about the lack of focus but I rather expect you to realise that such a photo can't be taken in a single shot especially when you are so close to the foreground so it is a mix of three shots, one focuses on the left, one on the right side of the frame and one for the background, now leave the light, half stop and crop, the biggest issue is to combine the in focus areas so I went over and over for another attempt early November and even tho the sun wasn't where I want it to be to cast the warm light I want I came to realise how to edit the shots and achieve a decent focus all along the frame, I printed it 20x24" and it looks quite impressive even tho not what I look forward to but I think you missed the whole tech point about it while I can agree to the mood which is a very personal thing.

Here the shot I am talking about which is almost totally in sharp focus

Best

Giovanni




Feb 11, 2026 at 03:06 PM
       2       end






FM Forums | City, Street & Architecture | Join Upload & Sell

       2       end
    
 

Welcome back
Log in to your account