jaygould wrote:
I know the Viltrox and the Sony G are both sharp lenses, but how do they differ in terms of rendering? Is the G lens worth the extra cost?
Purely in terms of image quality, the extra cost is absolutely not worth it in my opinion; quite the opposite, in fact. The 50 Air clearly delivers a technically superior image in my eyes. However, I didn't use the two side-by-side, as I returned the 50G immediately after trying it out and only bought the 50 Air months later. Image quality aside, the 50G is of course top-notch. Smaller, lighter, better feel in the hand, better autofocus, nicer manual focusing, aperture ring, and function button.
But it's also even less bright than the 50 Air.
My opinion, and completely disregarding the considerable price difference: If it's about handling, then go for the 50 G; if it's about the image, then go for the 50 Air.