Source? My own testing very different. https://flic.kr/s/aHBqjCEueA
And this is on a 26MP sensor - worse on 40MP. But in line with Optical Limits and LensTip.
I wonder if the people who authored all those books were obsessing over what type of processor was in the computer they used when they were writing them?
Nielk Mike wrote:
Just look at my samples. If that doesn't tell you anything, then go and live in peace.
It’s pretty clear you don’t read the complete post before you post, so I will repeat a key comment: Unfortunately, your samples weren’t done at infinity. Warts show up at distance, especially edges and corners.
Jack Flesher wrote:
It’s pretty clear you don’t read the complete post before you post, so I will repeat a key comment: Unfortunately, your samples weren’t done at infinity. Warts show up at distance, especially edges and corners.
Just look at the images and tell us what you see :-) Optical Limits and LensTip testing confirm what you see.
Even Alik Griffin says:
"On the technical side, like sharpness, distortion, CA, etc., this lens is just okay. I think most review sites would give it a B+ or something. However, some of this was by design, and the lens was left less than perfect in favor of “the look”. . . So they say."
and
"The 35mm f1.4 is sharp. Edges and corners are a little softer until about f2.8, but for the most part, it’s a great lens for shooting wide open or stopping down."
As I said, live in peace with whatever you believe about the 35f1.4
