fredmiranda.com
Login

Moderated by: Fred Miranda
  New fredmiranda.com Mobile Site
  New Feature: SMS Notification alert
  New Feature: Buy & Sell Watchlist
  

FM Forums | Nikon Forum | Join Upload & Sell

1       2       3              5       end
  

Is Leica a good alternative to Nikon

  
 
youie
Offline
• •
Upload & Sell: Off
p.4 #1 · Is Leica a good alternative to Nikon


Abuttolph wrote:
Pretty presumptuous of you to think that you can speak for HBC, or to suggest that he is the only reason why Leica is still in business. He probably was the most famous Leica photographer and an incredible master at that. There have been and still are many Leica photographers, both well-known and unknown who have worked with and enjoyed their Leica equipment.

People are free to choose and use whatever gear that they want. Because someone uses any particular brand, that does not make them an exhibitionist. Do some people use their Leica gear for show? Yes, absolutely. However, there
...Show more

Yes I might do that, thanks for the suggestion .



Nov 16, 2025 at 09:34 PM
youie
Offline
• •
Upload & Sell: Off
p.4 #2 · Is Leica a good alternative to Nikon


JadedWriter wrote:
I mean...you could just buy the 1.8 lenses instead of the 1.2's.


JadedWriter, I don't have any Nikon 1.8 lenses, what would you recommend for street photography?
Thank You.



Jan 14, 2026 at 05:52 PM
Cliff L.
Online
• • • • • • •
Upload & Sell: On
p.4 #3 · Is Leica a good alternative to Nikon


youie wrote:
So, I was wondering how many of you think the Leica system would be a very good alternative to the Nikon system?



If your subjects don't move, and you can get them in precise focus, many of the newer Leica lenses are among the best you can get.



Jan 14, 2026 at 06:03 PM
JadedWriter
Offline
• • • •
Upload & Sell: Off
p.4 #4 · Is Leica a good alternative to Nikon


Probably the 35 and 50 1.8's.
youie wrote:
JadedWriter, I don't have any Nikon 1.8 lenses, what would you recommend for street photography?
Thank You.





Jan 15, 2026 at 10:00 AM
AmbientMike
Offline
• • • • • •
[X]
p.4 #5 · Is Leica a good alternative to Nikon




youie wrote:
Hi all,
The title of the thread may be a little misleading, because it could be another camera brand. But I always was "interested" by the Leica brand.
Let me explain, I'm a Nikon fan, I have been shotting Nikon for several years. I appreciate top quality optics, but I'm not getting any younger. At the beginning I was using DSLR's, that I found quite "big" . When Nikon introduced the mirrorless option, I thought to my self, finally I will be using top of the line line optics but in a small form factor. But it turns out, the best in
...Show more

Well we're on page 4 now, maybe you've already decided, But i made this decision years ago, vs Leica R. Basically Leica was more expensive, and it didn't seem to make a lot of difference. Which lens did I want to do without, none of them, so I kept Nikon

Leica M: are you ok having nothing over 135mm, no af afaik, no zooms? Completely different systems. Leica SL might be good if youre okay having less lenses

It's just 2 different things, Leica and Nikon





Jan 15, 2026 at 11:24 AM
youie
Offline
• •
Upload & Sell: Off
p.4 #6 · Is Leica a good alternative to Nikon


I haven’t made my mind yet, but I’m very close to make my final decision.
English isn’t my first language so I sometimes I have a hard time expressing myself or translating my thoughts into words.
My question should have been more precise; it was not about Leica replacing Nikon as a full system.
My favorite set-up is the Z7II with the Nikon 28mm 1.4ED, but for a walk combo I find it a little bit awkward and to big.
So, what I wanted really to know was if the Leica Q3 that has a very good 28mm lens, could replace my set-up.
Clearly, I’m not interested in leaving the Nikon system, and during me research, I found out that many photographers have the Q3 as their street/family vacation set up.
Thank You for inquiring about my question.



Jan 15, 2026 at 12:42 PM
panos.v
Online
• • • •
Upload & Sell: Off
p.4 #7 · Is Leica a good alternative to Nikon


If 28mm is a focal length you like and you regularly go out with just a 28 then the Q is a good option. If you're into a fixed lens 28mm body there is always the GFX100RF. Which is a bit of a niche thing but the price, size and focal length is there.

Final point, you are looking at cameras costing thousands of dollars. They are good. All of them. The one you have and the ones you're looking at. The deciding factor is price, weight, size and usability (as in ergonomics). Image quality stopped being a factor 10 years ago (probably more than 10 years actually).



Jan 15, 2026 at 12:53 PM
urbanwild
Offline
• • •
Upload & Sell: Off
p.4 #8 · Is Leica a good alternative to Nikon


youie wrote:
I haven’t made my mind yet, but I’m very close to make my final decision.
English isn’t my first language so I sometimes I have a hard time expressing myself or translating my thoughts into words.
My question should have been more precise; it was not about Leica replacing Nikon as a full system.
My favorite set-up is the Z7II with the Nikon 28mm 1.4ED, but for a walk combo I find it a little bit awkward and to big.
So, what I wanted really to know was if the Leica Q3 that has a very good 28mm lens, could replace my set-up.
Clearly, I’m
...Show more

Hi @youie - I went down this road a bit and started looking at Leica for street photography, but I ended buying the Zf. It's not a small camera and yes I'd still be keen to try a Leica, but I ended up with it because it is more versatile, it keeps me in the system and it's still a very different option than lugging around a Z8. I have some small lenses now for street - the 28mm SE and the 40mm SE which are nowhere as good as Leica quality (or Nikon S), but they are my autofocus choices. I then have the CV 35, 50 and Thypoch 28 as my better optics kit which are all manual focus. Not a perfect kit. Would love a Leica Q for its uniqueness, but this was my compromise. I sold my Z6ii and the Zf now lines up with my Z8 really well in terms of having a second camera for portraits, sports, etc. I use the Zf for travel now too. I agree with others that the 1.8S lenses are also excellent with Nikon. I had the 35mm, but I've kept the 50mm and the 85mm.....I'll keep both for a long time.

If you do a spec comparison of the two cameras, the resolution and the lens quality are really the biggest reasons to go with the Leica. But then if you want AF and a faster shutter speed, the Zf is superior. They weight is about the same and the Leica is actually the larger volume camera....but not a real comparison because the Leica has the lens as well.....but point being the Leica isn't super small either. I think it's important to ask what it is that is really drawing you to Leica? Yes the IQ of the Leica is pretty amazing, but the difference in IQ would not be great and you lose the versatility. I think there's a good argument to using a Zf and buying nice lenses for the same price as the Leica. But yes, if I didn't have a budget, I'd want to have a Q as well



Jul 04, 2026 at 11:33 AM
Ripolini
Offline
• • • •
Upload & Sell: Off
p.4 #9 · Is Leica a good alternative to Nikon


I bet @youie@ made his own decision
However, if MF could be a viable option, I think that Z7II w/Z CV 28/2 Apo-Lanthar is the best solution (red curves refer to the 28/1.7 Leica):








Jul 04, 2026 at 12:18 PM
philip_pj
Offline
• • • • • •
Upload & Sell: On
p.4 #10 · Is Leica a good alternative to Nikon


Alas, MTF is not a reflection of pictorial quality, except on the most reductionist of (purely technical) scales. MTF cannot model 'that special something' that some lenses deliver. You need to look at images for that determination. I wish it was different too, life would be much easier.




Jul 04, 2026 at 06:07 PM
 


Search in Used Dept. 

mikard
Offline
• •
Upload & Sell: Off
p.4 #11 · Is Leica a good alternative to Nikon


I have sworn off zooms and returned to fix lenses on my Z8. If unobtrusive rules the day, my 28mm f/2.8 ai-s on a f to z, aperture set to F9 and the zone focus set between the 15-30 mark, usually produces great sharp landscape results corner to corner. If autofocus rules the day, then my 28mm f/1.4 e is the preferred carry. Svelt it is not, but the best possible quality and focus accuracy can be realized under any conditions realized. As for Leica, I have borrowed my son's Q3, and have been tempted on many occasions to pick up one. It is the equal , actually better due to the 60 megapixels then my 28mm f/1.4 e setup on the Z8. One of these days, I will hit on Powerball and that Q will be mine


Jul 04, 2026 at 09:59 PM
Ripolini
Offline
• • • •
Upload & Sell: Off
p.4 #12 · Is Leica a good alternative to Nikon



philip_pj wrote:
Alas, MTF is not a reflection of pictorial quality, except on the most reductionist of (purely technical) scales. MTF cannot model 'that special something' that some lenses deliver. You need to look at images for that determination. I wish it was different too, life would be much easier.



Do you mean I forgot to mention Z7II + Thypoch Simera 28/1.4 combo?



Jul 05, 2026 at 01:39 AM
RexGig0
Offline
• • •
Upload & Sell: On
p.4 #13 · Is Leica a good alternative to Nikon


When I added the Leica M system, in April 2018, it was mostly because of one lens, the Summilux-M 50mm ASPH. This was before the Z6 or Z7 were extant, and, Sony's ergonomics and menus made it a no-go. So, I discarded a plan to buy the then-latest/greatest Nikkor 600mm f/4, which enabled me to fund a new M10, and the pre-owned Summilux. Notably, this was before Leica M digital cameras were being listed at stratospheric prices; if I recall correctly, a new M10 listed for $6895 US at the time, so, I bought the Summilux, the M10, AND my Zeiss Otus 85mm ZF.2 for less than the price of a new Nikkor top-tier 600mm. (We had already bought my wife's D850, by then, and it seemed likely that I would be adding a D850, too.)

One consideration was that I had tweaked my left rotator cuff, while clearing debris after Hurricane Harvey, so, would not be using large/long "super" telephoto lenses, for a while longer. By the time my left shoulder was rehabilitated, my wife and I had shifted the focus of our nature/wildlife photography, no pun intended, to insects, other wee beasties, and plants. Macro/Close-Range; the skill we had developed while performing forensic/evidentiary/crime scene photography, but using AF-C/AI Servo* settings, to capture species moving about, in the natural environment, to document their location. We both became content to let the truly dedicated, with younger and stronger bodies, carry long lenses, to chase birds. (She is not the junior photographer, but the mentor who guided my path into using interchangeable-lens cameras.)

I do not regret buying into the Leica M system. That Summilux may have been the key factor that kept me from quitting photography. I love the manual tech/gadget factor of the rangefinder. Rangefinder usage is probably not what truly saved and rehabilitated my desire to photograph. Manually focusing lenses, with a Nikon camera body, is probably not less meditative that performing that same act with any lens on a Leica M body.

I will not even get started on the Leica Q system, except to say that there is nothing compact about that rather large lens being mounted on a body that is not appreciably smaller than an M body, and, I would not want one point of failure/breakage to relegate to using a smart phone as my only camera, for the remainder of a trip.

I do not regret having added the Leica M system, but, with the Z system now available, other options are extant.

*I had actually learned this, while photographing living, breathing crime victims, often in the back of an ambulance or in a hospital treatment room, where a tripod was not practicable. "Action Macro," anyone?




Jul 05, 2026 at 10:53 AM
PDH1954
Online

Upload & Sell: Off
p.4 #14 · Is Leica a good alternative to Nikon


Nikon SLR film shooter here, bought a M3 and Summicron. Different not better nor worse

Leica M3 Pluses
You aren't not looking thru colored filters or N.D.s which is way nice
Eyepiece is on the left of the camera, a plus as you aren't pushing your face against the camera back looking thru the view finder

Cons
Believe it or not I missed not having a built-in light meter
I found Nikon's focusing system easier to use
Limited close up distance of the M3

Both camera & lens were sent out for a fresh CLA, so the M3 was not limited by neglect.

It may be much more one sided using Digital...




Edited on Jul 05, 2026 at 03:15 PM · View previous versions



Jul 05, 2026 at 01:15 PM
MattStevens
Offline
• •
Upload & Sell: On
p.4 #15 · Is Leica a good alternative to Nikon


I am currently traveling around the Baltic Sea region with a Z8/24-120 and Q3. Earlier on our trip my wife and I shot a relative's wedding with these cameras and the images turned out great. The singular advantage the Q3 has over the Z8/24-120 combo is it's size for everyday carry. If I'm walking around medieval downtowns or shooting street art, it's Q3 every time. If I'm doing something more intentional, like shooting dilapidated 1940s warehouses or dunes on the Curonian Spit, it's definitely Z8 and 24-120.


Jul 05, 2026 at 01:17 PM
youie
Offline
• •
Upload & Sell: Off
p.4 #16 · Is Leica a good alternative to Nikon


urbanwild wrote:
Hi @youie@ - I went down this road a bit and started looking at Leica for street photography, but I ended buying the Zf. It's not a small camera and yes I'd still be keen to try a Leica, but I ended up with it because it is more versatile, it keeps me in the system and it's still a very different option than lugging around a Z8. I have some small lenses now for street - the 28mm SE and the 40mm SE which are nowhere as good as Leica quality (or Nikon S), but they are my autofocus
...Show more
Hi @urbanwild,
Thank you for your input, I actually haven't made up my decision, for me to buy the Leica Q3 it would mean that I would have to sell my Nikon set-up.
And right now, here where I live it's not that easy to sell camera gear, and the Leica Q3 costs around 10K.



Jul 05, 2026 at 04:08 PM
SteveCl55
Offline

Upload & Sell: Off
p.4 #17 · Is Leica a good alternative to Nikon


For Leica money I'd go Hasselblad X2dii and lens.


Jul 06, 2026 at 07:20 AM
CCoppola82
Offline
• •
Upload & Sell: Off
p.4 #18 · Is Leica a good alternative to Nikon


IMHO the only reason to get a digital Leica is if you have a stable of lenses from using a film M Or still use the film M along with digital. Even that’s a stretch these days though. I have an MP240 AND M246 for years now along with a couple film Ms. The m246 sensor is unique so I’ll likely keep it. Hard to explain if you’ve never played with a monochrome sensor file, but it has acutance that I can’t get with color digitals.

I have a ZF I grabbed for work and it’s better than my M bodies by a long shot. I got it specifically so I can use my M glass if I want to. The tech art adapter allows for AF too! As to the lenses, I would probably say the 50mm 1.8s might be one of the best all around 50mm lenses ever made. It’s THAT good and huge bonus for being priced reasonably.

The Q’s never interested me because they aren’t THAT compact, I’m stuck with a single focal length, and leicas QC and service are abysmal. You pay 10k for a camera THEY effed up on and you need to send it in for 3 months or longer waiting for them to fix it. What do you do in the meantime?

All cameras take good images today. If I was in the OP shoes I would find a system that has the glass lineup in the right size and quality….then get a small body from that system. Fuji, Olympus, Nikon….. don’t discount the little 40 and 28 from Nikon. I use the hell out of that 40mm and get great images!




Jul 06, 2026 at 10:47 PM
selahsean
Online
• •
Upload & Sell: Off
p.4 #19 · Is Leica a good alternative to Nikon


CCoppola82 wrote:


I have a ZF I grabbed for work and it’s better than my M bodies by a long shot. I got it specifically so I can use my M glass if I want to. The tech art adapter allows for AF too! As to the lenses, I would probably say the 50mm 1.8s might be one of the best all around 50mm lenses ever made. It’s THAT good and huge bonus for being priced reasonably.



I'm a M10M and ZF shooter and I'd push back on the "better than M bodies" a bit. The ZF does produce remarkably great images and I find the sensor produces very similar images to my previous M10-P. For me at least the M10M basically gets out of my way and lets me push ISO past 80k comfortably. I'm typically zone focusing and shooting more from the hip. Something that I haven't found I can do as reliably well from any of the mainstream mirrorless cameras. I bought and sold and re-bought the M10M because I missed it so much. I know people tend to talk about slowing down with their Leicas but for me at the least the M10M is the opposite I find the process of making photographs with it much faster, easier and the results closer to what I envision when I make a photograph.

Conversely, for me the ZF takes more time for me and requires more effort (whoever designed the menus should be fired into the sun). For me the ZF fills a need for a compact color camera with reliable autofocus with a higher pixel pitch but I wouldn't say it's appreciably better than any of modern (M10+) Leica bodies. For me they fill different needs/wants and each has their place.



Jul 07, 2026 at 08:20 AM
Luke_Miller
Offline
• •
Upload & Sell: Off
p.4 #20 · Is Leica a good alternative to Nikon


youie wrote:
Hi all,
The title of the thread may be a little misleading, because it could be another camera brand. But I always was "interested" by the Leica brand.
Let me explain, I'm a Nikon fan, I have been shotting Nikon for several years. I appreciate top quality optics, but I'm not getting any younger. At the beginning I was using DSLR's, that I found quite "big" . When Nikon introduced the mirrorless option, I thought to my self, finally I will be using top of the line line optics but in a small form factor. But it turns out, the best in
...Show more

I shoot a bit of everything so no, my Leicas do not replace my Nikons. My passion however, is event photography and there my Leica SL bodies and 24-90 and 90-280 lenses fully replace my Nikons. My Q2 and digital M bodies have no counterpart in the Nikon world and serve as travel and walking around cameras. So it all depends on what you like to shoot. If one needs state of the art autofocus the Leicas fall short. But even for subjects running at full speed it works fine if one knows how to use it. Latest Leica models are much improved in this regard. But my Nikon Z8 and Z9 are almost magical in they way they can gain focus in situations where, previously, I would not have attempted to get a shot.

If your subjects map to what Leicas are good at, they are great cameras. The build quality and simplicity of controls and menus make them more enjoyable to use than my Nikons. Leica glass is world class. Leicas are my first choice for studio and portraiture, landscape, events, and travel. Sports, other action, and wildlife calls for my Nikons both for the autofocus and exotic long lenses.





Jul 07, 2026 at 08:30 AM
1       2       3              5       end






FM Forums | Nikon Forum | Join Upload & Sell

1       2       3              5       end
    
 

Welcome back
Log in to your account