p.42 #6 · Fuji GFX Image Thread - all cameras and lenses
Today's bore tide, Turnagain Arm, Alaska. Bald Eagles and seagulls gather for the bore tide to catch stranded and disoriented fish (there are 8 eagles in this shot) | 100sii, 500 + 1.4x tc
p.42 #10 · Fuji GFX Image Thread - all cameras and lenses
Peire wrote:
Various tulips in the colourful environment by GF 250/4 with 18mm tube.
These are beautiful Peire! So vibrant! So colorful~ Great texture in the colors on some of the tulips...LOve flowers up close and personal!
Dan
p.42 #12 · Fuji GFX Image Thread - all cameras and lenses
rji2goleez wrote:
Sunset in Monochrome
That lens may be on my "wish list" Bob! I love the GF 45-100 BUT wish I had a bit more natural "width" in some shots.
Love the light, love the scene!
Dan
p.42 #13 · Fuji GFX Image Thread - all cameras and lenses
Danpbphoto wrote:
These are beautiful Peire! So vibrant! So colorful~ Great texture in the colors on some of the tulips...LOve flowers up close and personal!
Dan
Thank you Dan! Much appreciated! I love flowers up close too.
p.42 #14 · Fuji GFX Image Thread - all cameras and lenses
Danpbphoto wrote:
That lens may be on my "wish list" Bob! I love the GF 45-100 BUT wish I had a bit more natural "width" in some shots.
Love the light, love the scene!
Dan
Thanks Dan! I knew I wanted this lens for landscape work and it will be my prime lens for that purpose. The 45-100 seems like a great all arounder. For now, I have the GF 32-64, GF 23/4 and the 100-200/5.6. I also have a few adapted lenses but these three are my main kit. Oh and the 45/2.8 as a walk around lens is superb.
p.42 #16 · Fuji GFX Image Thread - all cameras and lenses
rji2goleez wrote:
Thanks Dan! I knew I wanted this lens for landscape work and it will be my prime lens for that purpose. The 45-100 seems like a great all arounder. For now, I have the GF 32-64, GF 23/4 and the 100-200/5.6. I also have a few adapted lenses but these three are my main kit. Oh and the 45/2.8 as a walk around lens is superb.
Your work is beautiful, definitely showcases what the platform is capable of. So I offer comments only regarding the lenses, 32-64 or 45-100. I have both but will likely sell the 32-64. They are both amazing zooms but I love shooting wide and use the 20-35 quite a bit. Used with the 45-100, I get a very useful 20-100 coverage with a small gap. The gap doesn't bother me but I like the 64-100 reach. If I didn't have and love the 20-35, I would go with 32-64. It's kind of a no lose choice though.
p.42 #17 · Fuji GFX Image Thread - all cameras and lenses
SGinNorcal wrote:
Your work is beautiful, definitely showcases what the platform is capable of. So I offer comments only regarding the lenses, 32-64 or 45-100. I have both but will likely sell the 32-64. They are both amazing zooms but I love shooting wide and use the 20-35 quite a bit. Used with the 45-100, I get a very useful 20-100 coverage with a small gap. The gap doesn't bother me but I like the 64-100 reach. If I didn't have and love the 20-35, I would go with 32-64. It's kind of a no lose choice though.
Thanks for the comment on my images. I debated on exactly the points you are raising. I chose the 23/4 only from my past experiences of shooting wide angle zooms predominantly at their wide end. I still debate not having the 20-35 (for now). The 32-64 is more in my typical landscape focal length range. I can see getting the 45-100 . . . closer to the standard 35mm equivalent of a 24-70. The 100-200/5.6 was purchased for a specific project and may not stay in the arsenal. This platform is so new to me but my focus is landscape.
We'll see how it all goes. There is no right or wrong, especially with such a strong lens lineup.
p.42 #18 · Fuji GFX Image Thread - all cameras and lenses
Today was our monthly local camera meetup group. So many cameras including some 5x7. Many brought multiple cameras. I brought my GFX and my Leica M3 mixing the old with the new.
The images here were taken with my GFX 100S II and adapted Zeiss Contax 50/1.7