p.4 #1How long do you think a latent image lasts on undeveloped film?
Next up. Tmax 400 from 1993. Loaded in my M5, rating it at 100. Because, well, this is all a cr@p-shoot.
The box looks all nice n fresh, so what could possibly go wrong?
p.4 #7How long do you think a latent image lasts on undeveloped film?
Desmolicious wrote:
Next up. Tmax 400 from 1993. Loaded in my M5, rating it at 100. Because, well, this is all a cr@p-shoot.
The box looks all nice n fresh, so what could possibly go wrong?
While that is loaded, I also loaded TMAX 3200 in my blue Konica C35 EF3. No idea as to the age of this film. It first was released in 1986, then re-introduced in 2018.
Seeing the Tri-X I had was from the late 80s, I'm guessing this TMAX is of similar vintage. And since the TriX required a three stop drop in film speed, I'm going to do the same for the TMAX, and rate it at 100.
I'm just wingin' it!
p.4 #19How long do you think a latent image lasts on undeveloped film?
Ok, next up is the Fuji Neopan 1600. Again, age assumed to be around the 25 yr mark given that's what the other films have been.
Rating this at ISO 200. Three stops should work, right?
p.4 #20How long do you think a latent image lasts on undeveloped film?
And the other roll of Neopan 1600 loaded into a Nikon LiteTouch AF. This camera only accurately sets the DX at 100, 200, 400, 1000. Everything else is a weird mix in-between. It defaults 1600 to 400! You'd think 1000. But this works for me as the Neopan 1600 is ancient so I want more light to hit it anyway.