nmerc_photos Offline Upload & Sell: On
|
p.1 #4 · p.1 #4 · Thermal Imaging / Night Vision for Birdwatching? | |
The Rat wrote:
All right, a question with some overlap to another life.
I don't have much experience with civilian thermals other than the FLIR Scout TK unit, which I can say sucks. It wouldn't pick up the thermal signature of a raccoon in a tree that was 20m away, that I could clearly see in my night vision. The limitation of thermals, be it head mounted or handheld, is that you can't use them that well to move around, navigate, make sure you're not tripping on logs in the dark, etc. Detection-wise, a good thermal unit will definitely identify things faster than with night vision. But moving around in the dark, unless you want to go white light, you'll be a lot more limited. (If your plan is to stay in one location and wait for owls, this may not be an issue, but if you're out wandering the woods, it would be.)
Night vision. These will be more broadly useful at night, as it's a lot more doable to move around and navigate with. This does take practice, and tempering your expectations. You're not going to move around as though it were daylight, but you'll be leaps and bounds over trying to navigate by moonlight alone. A headlamp would be easier of course, but then I'm guessing that may spook the owls. The amount you can see in night vision will depend a lot on the conditions and the quality of your unit; I wouldn't go any lower than a gen3 unit. A moonless cloudy night is gonna suck regardless of tube quality, but even partial moonlight will let you see pretty well.
I've never seen owls at night, but given that they're nocturnal and have eyes tuned for the night, my guess is that they're like raccoons or cats. If you look at them with night vision, and they're looking at you, their eyes light up, especially if you're using IR illumination of some kind on them. That's even something as small as a PVS-14's built-in illuminator, that's been more than enough to spot raccoons up in the trees above the chicken coop.
I dunno about a cheaper entry point, but I guess compared to the more expensive thermals, sure. A new PVS-14 is $3-5k depending on The cheapest I'd recommend is a used PVS-14 for $2-2.5k. You would also need some means to wear it, such as a ballistic helmet, bump (non-ballistic) helmet, skull crusher (not recommended, guess where it got the name) or something like a Crye nightcap. You'll also need a J-arm and a rhino mount to attach the monocular to the head wear. The cheapest option for that stuff would be a used/surplus Army MICH/ACH helmet, NV helmet bracket, rhino mount and J-arm. Total would be $2.5k-3k roughly there, going with a used PVS-14 and all surplus USGI gear.
If you want to spend more money, the sky's the limit. My experience is mostly with PVS-14s, but there are much fancier and more expensive binocular units that cost upwards of $15k. There are even the quads that cost up to $45-60k. I'd say this is an insane level of cost that's outside the realm of most hobbies, but hey, I'm on a photography forum.
My one caveat is don't buy a PVS-7. They suck. They're splitting the image from one lens over both of your eyes, meaning you don't get any depth perception. Every single time I've walked around in the dark with a PVS-7, I've busted my ass on something trivial. With at least a single PVS-14, you have some depth perception and awareness from your non-NV eye. Binocular night vision similarly gives you depth perception, and can be a better on very dark nights. Most professional orgs (MIL/LE) have been moving to binoculars in the last many years, so I presume there's a lot of value with them. I just can't afford them, especially since I don't use my NV much anymore. My only binocular experience is with two PVS-14s in a bridge mount, which worked well, but was heavy.
Side tangential note, looking at the stars with night vision is always awe inspiring.
Hopefully this is some food for thought! You can find a lot about night vision on various websites and forums out there....Show more →
This is excellent stuff thank you!
I'm envisioning my use case would mainly be walking through the woods, stop, whip out a thermal or NV, look around 360 degrees and then keep moving for a bit, and repeat. I don't imagine I'd be trying to walk with either gear up "in use".
I have some millitary buddies with NV gear so I'll be getting to test some of theirs out soon, as well as some family members down in Texas who hunt with NV that I didn't know about until I started chatting with them about it recently.
I'm thinking of going with the new Pular Telos XP LRF for around ~$4K USD if I can find one in stock, as a thermal.
My understanding is that thermal is better for detection, and NV is better for identification. I'm mainly interesting in scanning areas and seeing if I can find nested owls, bedded owls, etc. so that I know where to setup during dawn/dusk to hopefully see them in the future.
I'm planning on also picking up a cheap $200 Dsoon N2 NV binos to mess around with in the backyard, or for times when I've been out owling until dark, and want to keep watching them for a bit
|