Desmolicious Offline Upload & Sell: Off
|
AmbientMike wrote:
I never really got into the p&s's, even at release I probably could have gotten a film SLR, plus wide, 50mm, & ~70-210 same price as T2 or a lot less. Even something like Canon photura might have been over $300, enough to get $<125 body, maybe already having 50mm, and a couple lenses
A relative used to have a nice little Canon 35mm FL p&s, lens seemed good, might be a great option if you are looking for a less expensive option. Canonet seemed good too, never really used mine though, got it in a lot. 40mm lens rangefinder. ...Show more →
The idea behind P&S cameras is that they are non-threatening to use - anyone can grab and go - the form factor makes them very easy to slip into a pocket, and there is nothing more to get or add on to.
Any film SLR with 35mm lens is going to be huge compared to a T2. And you can't slip the SLR into a pocket, or carry around casually. You are always aware it is there. And so are other people.
I think the surprise for many SLR owners is that many P&S cameras can give results equal to what they were getting from their gear, and with much less hassle.
I miss my Fuji Klasse W because it was tiny and gave results equal to any other 35mm camera with a 28mm lens. But all these P&S cameras break long before an SLR would. Which is a big deal in this present day as they are now breaking.
I use my N80 35mm AF slr as a P&S camera most of the time. And it gives fantastic results for a fraction of the cost of many P&S cameras. But no way can I slip that sucker into a pocket. Anyway, I am not trying to convince anyone to get a high end P&S, this thread is about NOT getting one as they are on their last legs!
|