40Driggs Offline Upload & Sell: Off
|
I used to think that the 200-500 f5.6 outperformed its price point; I have found the 180-600 to do so beyond that of the F-mount lens. While I'm sure there are copy variations between lenses, I've never experienced this before. While the 180-600 is my "cheap" telephoto lens, there is nothing cheap about how it performs.
cheers,
bruce
I agree with the sentiments that you've shared in the last few posts. Primes will always win at the end of the day, but proper use of a quality zoom lens yields real world results that are very comparable. I've shot the 200-500 and 500 pf and the zoom doesn't lose much to the prime as long as you have a good copy of the zoom. This new Nikon zoom easily bests the 200-500 so I'm sure that anyone would be happy with it outside of fringe use cases (heavy cropping, adding TC's etc.)
I've shot multiple systems and feel that this was true with Nikon 200-500, Sony 70-400, Sony 200-600. I even had good luck with the old school Canon 100-400 if used in the right conditions back when I was first shooting.
|