raizans wrote:
madnbad, are you using a red filter, or is that all from the rodinal at low dilution?
I have a clear B+W 010 on the front of the lens plus the hood. On a different site my early attempts with Tri-X developed in Rodinal were dense and over exposed. One comment pointed out the problems, I asked the commenter for help in improving my technique. It was a simple fix and made a world of difference. I got rid of the #8 yellow filter, reduced the ISO to 200 to make up for using Rodinal which apparently wants users to give up speed to reduce grain. When developing, gently agitate for the first minute then two agitation every minute. The negative were developed for ten minutes at 20C.
I use a Sony A7II fitted with a FE90 2.8 Macro mounted on a Negative Supply Pro Riser MK2 that I modified with longer screws for the legs, a Boos Block cutting board as a base held in place with wood working clamps. A Pro Carrier 135 keeps the film flat, illumination is provide by yet another Negative Supply piece, a 5X7 Lightsource Pro 95 CRI.
The capture is done at +1.7EV over base exposure. Conversion is with Gentlemen Coders RAW Power plug in for Apple Photos. If I’ve done my job in exposing the negative correctly, there is very little, if any, adjustment in post.
Hope that answers your question.
So happy to see this new lens from CV - I've always wanted to see a new version of the Color Skopar 28mm f/3.5. I have that lens for Nikon S-mount and it is unfortunately too fogged to use anymore. Strongly considering buying the thread mount version in silver, even though the version II seems more ergonomic. It looks like a great lens for both film and digital.
I applied my favorite preset on them in C1 Pro and on some of the shots on the 2nd album I also reduced vignetting a bit here and there.
I really like this lens (I got the Black version II). Usability is great and I think it works pretty decently on Sony. I can also use it at hard infinity on my A7C with my Rayqual adapter for best corner-to-corner sharpness for long distance shots. Vignetting is a bit strong but it's easy to reduce it in post if desired.
Desmolicious wrote:
It's interesting that many of CV's recent lenses have a lot of vignetting. The 28 Ultron, the 28 Color Skopar, the 50 1.5 II.
Well if a lens has to have an aberration I prefer it to be vignetting. It is easily fixed in post, and I actually end up adding a vignette in many of my images. I really don't like excessive CA, distortion, or sharpness dips.
1bwana1 wrote:
Well if a lens has to have an aberration I prefer it to be vignetting. It is easily fixed in post, and I actually end up adding a vignette in many of my images. I really don't like excessive CA, distortion, or sharpness dips.
You can usually correct strong vignetting in editing without much quality loss. However, this bring along 'optical' vignetting that affects how bokeh balls look at the edges, giving them a cat's-eye shape. This can create noticeable swirling effects based on how far the subject is, but it's not entirely negative because some people actually appreciate this kind of look.
It looks like Cosina isn't addressing this problem to maintain the compactness of their lenses.
This particular characteristic is well recognized in their latest lens designs. The extremely compact CV 28/2.8 lens, which is almost as thin as a pancake, appears to be the most extreme example of this trend.
I applied my favorite preset on them in C1 Pro and on some of the shots on the 2nd album I also reduced vignetting a bit here and there.
I really like this lens (I got the Black version II). Usability is great and I think it works pretty decently on Sony. I can also use it at hard infinity on my A7C with my Rayqual adapter for best corner-to-corner sharpness for long distance shots. Vignetting is a bit strong but it's easy to reduce it in post if desired....Show more →
Awesome photos from the museum, Juha! Seems like you had a fantastic time. I couldn't convince myself to trade the 28/2 Ultron for the Color-Skopar. I still believe the Ultron is one of the finest 28mm lenses out there, and it's small enough for my needs.
I will wait until I find a used 28/2.8 Type I to go with the 40/2.8. I have the 28/2 Ultra and it is probably my favorite lens for my M10-R but there are times when I know I won't need f2 and the smaller size would be appreciated.
As much as the aperture ring is inconvenient on the type 1, I am drawn to it because like you Bruce, I already have the similar 40 2.8. It will make a nice set.
And if I want normal - I have other 28s for that.
Desmolicious wrote:
As much as the aperture ring is inconvenient on the type 1, I am drawn to it because like you Bruce, I already have the similar 40 2.8. It will make a nice set.
And if I want normal - I have other 28s for that.
Desmolicious wrote:
As much as the aperture ring is inconvenient on the type 1, I am drawn to it because like you Bruce, I already have the similar 40 2.8. It will make a nice set.
And if I want normal - I have other 28s for that.
I don't really see it as a big hassle, especially for street photography and zone focusing. In those situations, you don't need super precise focus, so it's simple to hold the focus ring and adjust the aperture if necessary. But typically, I find myself tinkering with the shutter speed and ISO more than the aperture when I'm in zone focusing mode.
Since I have the Ultron, I'm also more interested in the Type I because it operates in a completely different way mechanically and it's even thinner.
Fred Miranda wrote:
I don't really see it as a big hassle, especially for street photography and zone focusing. In those situations, you don't need super precise focus, so it's simple to hold the focus ring and adjust the aperture if necessary. But typically, I find myself tinkering with the shutter speed and ISO more than the aperture when I'm in zone focusing mode.
Since I have the Ultron, I'm also more interested in Type I because it operates in a completely different way mechanically and it's even thinner.
I'm sorry, as a film shooter I do not understand what you mean by 'tinkering with ..ISO'. Sounds like the devil's work to me.
