aCuria Offline Upload & Sell: Off
|
p.1 #14 · p.1 #14 · Pre-order: Sigma 17mm f/4, 50mm f/2, 23mm f/1.4 DC DN C lenses | |
freaklikeme wrote:
For someone always shooting at the wide end of the zoom, then it may make more sense to go with the prime with roughly half the packed size, a significantly smaller filter size, a significantly closer MFD, and less than half the price, since the optical performance characteristics at 17mm appear to be roughly the same. I'm not saying you should be thrilled with it or sell your PZ in favor of it, just that it will make some strong arguments for some to purchase it over the zoom or to augment their kits with it for times when they don't want to pack the zoom....Show more →
In the past I owned a 17/3.5 before picking up a 16-35/2.8L
When trying to “pack light” I would take the zoom, because taking primes means two lenses (17 + 35mm or 17+40mm)
Ultimately my experience is that the 17/3.5 was not a very useful lens when one owns a 16-35 too!
The target audience is probably someone who owns a 28-70 or 35-150 and is looking for a wider lens, but i think someone like this is still better served by a zoom like the 17-28, 16-28 or 16-35.
A prime would need to beat these zooms in either speed, sharpness or price to justify its existence, and I think it comes down to price for this 17/4 because it does not seem to beat the zooms in sharpness, and at f/4 it’s rather slow for a prime
|