Techart Pro LM-EA9 Review
foto16
Offline
Activity
[X]
Details
p.19 #1Techart Pro LM-EA9 Review
Fred Miranda wrote:
As mentioned earlier, the thicker cover glass of the Sony cameras will introduce field curvature and make the image soft for an off-center subject, when using adapters because the M lenses are design for a thinner cover glass. This is apparent in Fred's lens reviews (and Philip Reeve's review site). Only when you stop down to f5.6-8 you get sharp edges. So this looks to me just for fun when you already some m lenses but not for serious work.
I'm thinking of adapting a 35/1.4 m-mount lens because the E-mount AF f1.4 lenses are so huge. But I'm not going to adapt a f1.4 lens and only shoot it stopped down to f5.6-8.The main issue is the amplified field curvature introduced by the thicker sensor in M lenses, as they were originally designed for a much thinner stack. The solution is to stop the lens down for a broad depth of field or to modify the Sony camera by reducing the sensor stack. With these mods, AF will still work, there may be challenges with auto WB and the WB presets, requiring custom WB for accurate colors.
Another alternative is to use the full-frame Sony in crop mode, which also helps alleviate the curvature issues to some extent.
Does Nikon Z also have this issue, or it has a thinner cover glass than Sony?
foto16 wrote
I'm wondering do people use adapted M lenses wide open for serious work?As mentioned earlier, the thicker cover glass of the Sony cameras will introduce field curvature and make the image soft for an off-center subject, when using adapters because the M lenses are design for a thinner cover glass. This is apparent in Fred's lens reviews (and Philip Reeve's review site). Only when you stop down to f5.6-8 you get sharp edges. So this looks to me just for fun when you already some m lenses but not for serious work.
I'm thinking of adapting a 35/1.4 m-mount lens because the E-mount AF f1.4 lenses are so huge. But I'm not going to adapt a f1.4 lens and only shoot it stopped down to f5.6-8.
Another alternative is to use the full-frame Sony in crop mode, which also helps alleviate the curvature issues to some extent.
Does Nikon Z also have this issue, or it has a thinner cover glass than Sony?
Dec 23, 2023 at 02:34 PM
p.19 #2Techart Pro LM-EA9 Review
foto16 wrote:
As mentioned earlier, the thicker cover glass of the Sony cameras will introduce field curvature and make the image soft for an off-center subject, when using adapters because the M lenses are design for a thinner cover glass. This is apparent in Fred's lens reviews (and Philip Reeve's review site). Only when you stop down to f5.6-8 you get sharp edges. So this looks to me just for fun when you already some m lenses but not for serious work.
I'm thinking of adapting a 35/1.4 m-mount lens because the E-mount AF f1.4 lenses are so huge. But I'm not going to adapt a f1.4 lens and only shoot it stopped down to f5.6-8.The main issue is the amplified field curvature introduced by the thicker sensor in M lenses, as they were originally designed for a much thinner stack. The solution is to stop the lens down for a broad depth of field or to modify the Sony camera by reducing the sensor stack. With these mods, AF will still work, there may be challenges with auto WB and the WB presets, requiring custom WB for accurate colors.
Another alternative is to use the full-frame Sony in crop mode, which also helps alleviate the curvature issues to some extent.Does Nikon Z also have this issue, or it has a thinner cover glass than Sony?
Yes, there's a similar issue compared to Sony, contrary to misinformation posted online. It might have a slightly thinner stack than the Sony's sensor stack, but it's not enough to make any noticeable difference.
In my experiments, I found that only the Leica SL sensor stack works well with M-lenses (although still not optimal). This is true unless you're using modified sensors or, of course, M bodies.
Fred Miranda wrote
foto16 wrote
I'm wondering do people use adapted M lenses wide open for serious work?As mentioned earlier, the thicker cover glass of the Sony cameras will introduce field curvature and make the image soft for an off-center subject, when using adapters because the M lenses are design for a thinner cover glass. This is apparent in Fred's lens reviews (and Philip Reeve's review site). Only when you stop down to f5.6-8 you get sharp edges. So this looks to me just for fun when you already some m lenses but not for serious work.
I'm thinking of adapting a 35/1.4 m-mount lens because the E-mount AF f1.4 lenses are so huge. But I'm not going to adapt a f1.4 lens and only shoot it stopped down to f5.6-8.
Another alternative is to use the full-frame Sony in crop mode, which also helps alleviate the curvature issues to some extent.
Yes, there's a similar issue compared to Sony, contrary to misinformation posted online. It might have a slightly thinner stack than the Sony's sensor stack, but it's not enough to make any noticeable difference.
In my experiments, I found that only the Leica SL sensor stack works well with M-lenses (although still not optimal). This is true unless you're using modified sensors or, of course, M bodies.
Dec 23, 2023 at 02:58 PM
p.19 #3Techart Pro LM-EA9 Review
My LM-EA9 is still working fine, but sadly I have received too many reports of this adapter failing lately.
And these have been confirmed sales through the official channels.
What is even worse: it seems the customer support is pretty much non-existent at this point.
I therefore added several warnings to my review and until something about this situation changes I have to advise against buying one.
And these have been confirmed sales through the official channels.
What is even worse: it seems the customer support is pretty much non-existent at this point.
I therefore added several warnings to my review and until something about this situation changes I have to advise against buying one.
Feb 20, 2024 at 03:09 AM
p.19 #4Techart Pro LM-EA9 Review
It’s not just a black eye for the product but the company. I purchased one with very light use it broke. I won’t be using their products in the future.
Feb 20, 2024 at 10:43 AM
p.19 #5Techart Pro LM-EA9 Review
What a disappointment. Mine still works also... *fingers crossed*
Feb 20, 2024 at 11:14 AM
p.19 #6Techart Pro LM-EA9 Review
BastianK wrote:
My LM-EA9 is still working fine, but sadly I have received too many reports of this adapter failing lately.
And these have been confirmed sales through the official channels.
What is even worse: it seems the customer support is pretty much non-existent at this point.
I therefore added several warnings to my review and until something about this situation changes I have to advise against buying one.
It appears that transitioning from one large motor to four smaller ones seemed like a good idea and was impressive in the marketing materials. We all thought...They fixed the wobble!...However, it also meant a fourfold increase in the chance of malfunction. Mine was functioning properly until it suddenly stopped working one day during normal operation. I tried everything to revive it, but unfortunately, it was to no avail.
My LM-EA9 is still working fine, but sadly I have received too many reports of this adapter failing lately.
And these have been confirmed sales through the official channels.
What is even worse: it seems the customer support is pretty much non-existent at this point.
I therefore added several warnings to my review and until something about this situation changes I have to advise against buying one.
It appears that transitioning from one large motor to four smaller ones seemed like a good idea and was impressive in the marketing materials. We all thought...They fixed the wobble!...However, it also meant a fourfold increase in the chance of malfunction. Mine was functioning properly until it suddenly stopped working one day during normal operation. I tried everything to revive it, but unfortunately, it was to no avail.
Feb 20, 2024 at 11:16 AM
p.19 #7Techart Pro LM-EA9 Review
That's the only thing I've added that Allstate protection to from BH knowing the possibility of fail.
Feb 20, 2024 at 12:26 PM
p.19 #8Techart Pro LM-EA9 Review
For people that have used this adapter on modern bodies and the RX1 series, esp the RX1Rii: how does the autofocus compare?
I was thinking of pairing this adapter with a Voigtlander 35/1.5 or 40/1.2 on an A7Cx to make my own RX1R3. It’ll obviously be bigger, but at least it will try eyeAF on shutter, something the RX1 series won’t do
I was thinking of pairing this adapter with a Voigtlander 35/1.5 or 40/1.2 on an A7Cx to make my own RX1R3. It’ll obviously be bigger, but at least it will try eyeAF on shutter, something the RX1 series won’t do
Mar 11, 2024 at 10:42 AM
p.19 #9Techart Pro LM-EA9 Review
akashyap wrote:
For people that have used this adapter on modern bodies and the RX1 series, esp the RX1Rii: how does the autofocus compare?
I was thinking of pairing this adapter with a Voigtlander 35/1.5 or 40/1.2 on an A7Cx to make my own RX1R3. It’ll obviously be bigger, but at least it will try eyeAF on shutter, something the RX1 series won’t do
The LM-EA9 adapter is good at focusing in the center of the frame, but it has trouble focusing in the mid-zone and corners, depending on the lens. This becomes more apparent when tracking a subject. In these cases, the RX1 II performs better.
I bought another EA9 adapter after my previous one stopped working. So far, this new one is working fine.
For people that have used this adapter on modern bodies and the RX1 series, esp the RX1Rii: how does the autofocus compare?
I was thinking of pairing this adapter with a Voigtlander 35/1.5 or 40/1.2 on an A7Cx to make my own RX1R3. It’ll obviously be bigger, but at least it will try eyeAF on shutter, something the RX1 series won’t do
The LM-EA9 adapter is good at focusing in the center of the frame, but it has trouble focusing in the mid-zone and corners, depending on the lens. This becomes more apparent when tracking a subject. In these cases, the RX1 II performs better.
I bought another EA9 adapter after my previous one stopped working. So far, this new one is working fine.
Mar 11, 2024 at 10:53 AM
p.19 #10Techart Pro LM-EA9 Review
mine works really well with the 28mm Ultron II and the 50 1.5. Struggles a little with the 75 1.9. I have to get it close and then it will rack, but if focus is too far off it gets flummoxed. Eye AF works well. I don't know what the RX series weighs, but this plus CV lenses adds some weight.
Mar 11, 2024 at 11:40 AM
|
p.19 #11Techart Pro LM-EA9 Review
So, I thought my LM-EA9 wasn't working, turns out it just didn't work on my a7RmkIII.
But, I just tried it on my a7rV and a7cR and it's working really well. Like, my 50/1.2 Noctilux is working pretty darn good in AF-S and I'm getting nice eye/face and body tracking in AF-C. This is the best it's worked since I bought it new quite a while ago and what I was hoping for when I bought it. Not OEM fast, but AF that locks on fairly quickly with minimum prefocus.
Anyways, thought I'd check in as my last update was probably something like "why did I buy these paperweights"
Edit:
Just tried all my lenses, even my 75 is nailing focus quickly...cool!
I guess it just didn't like the old body.
But, I just tried it on my a7rV and a7cR and it's working really well. Like, my 50/1.2 Noctilux is working pretty darn good in AF-S and I'm getting nice eye/face and body tracking in AF-C. This is the best it's worked since I bought it new quite a while ago and what I was hoping for when I bought it. Not OEM fast, but AF that locks on fairly quickly with minimum prefocus.
Anyways, thought I'd check in as my last update was probably something like "why did I buy these paperweights"
Edit:
Just tried all my lenses, even my 75 is nailing focus quickly...cool!
I guess it just didn't like the old body.
Mar 11, 2024 at 12:05 PM
p.19 #12Techart Pro LM-EA9 Review
akashyap wrote:
I was thinking of pairing this adapter with a Voigtlander 35/1.5 or 40/1.2 on an A7Cx to make my own RX1R3. It’ll obviously be bigger, but at least it will try eyeAF on shutter, something the RX1 series won’t do
Why use such fast M glass when the thick sensor coverings on the Sony give mediocre results in the corner and midfield until at least f/5.6?
Voigtlander 35mm f/1.5
If you're trying to match an RX1R3 why not use something designed for Sony (with a slower aperture). It would probably be smaller, lighter, sharper and faster focusing than the M glass attached to the Techart?
I was thinking of pairing this adapter with a Voigtlander 35/1.5 or 40/1.2 on an A7Cx to make my own RX1R3. It’ll obviously be bigger, but at least it will try eyeAF on shutter, something the RX1 series won’t do
Why use such fast M glass when the thick sensor coverings on the Sony give mediocre results in the corner and midfield until at least f/5.6?
Voigtlander 35mm f/1.5
If you're trying to match an RX1R3 why not use something designed for Sony (with a slower aperture). It would probably be smaller, lighter, sharper and faster focusing than the M glass attached to the Techart?
Mar 11, 2024 at 02:08 PM
p.19 #13Techart Pro LM-EA9 Review
akashyap wrote:
For people that have used this adapter on modern bodies and the RX1 series, esp the RX1Rii: how does the autofocus compare?
I was thinking of pairing this adapter with a Voigtlander 35/1.5 or 40/1.2 on an A7Cx to make my own RX1R3. It’ll obviously be bigger, but at least it will try eyeAF on shutter, something the RX1 series won’t do
Here's my a7cR with my pre-asph 35 Summilux which is about the same size as the CV 35. The combo actually works pretty good. While I do agree with OscarF that there are better combo's with faster more accurate AF. What you are thinking is feasible and works fairly well.
For people that have used this adapter on modern bodies and the RX1 series, esp the RX1Rii: how does the autofocus compare?
I was thinking of pairing this adapter with a Voigtlander 35/1.5 or 40/1.2 on an A7Cx to make my own RX1R3. It’ll obviously be bigger, but at least it will try eyeAF on shutter, something the RX1 series won’t do
Here's my a7cR with my pre-asph 35 Summilux which is about the same size as the CV 35. The combo actually works pretty good. While I do agree with OscarF that there are better combo's with faster more accurate AF. What you are thinking is feasible and works fairly well.
Mar 11, 2024 at 07:54 PM
p.19 #14Techart Pro LM-EA9 Review
Thanks for the replies everyone.
OscarF wrote:
Why use such fast M glass when the thick sensor coverings on the Sony give mediocre results in the corner and midfield until at least f/5.6?
Voigtlander 35mm f/1.5
If you're trying to match an RX1R3 why not use something designed for Sony (with a slower aperture). It would probably be smaller, lighter, sharper and faster focusing than the M glass attached to the Techart?
Fair point! The only lightweight native E mount lenses that I like in that range for rendering are probably the Sigma 35/2 or Sigma 45/2.8 and I should give them a shot.
Otherwise, I don't mind sacrificing corner to corner sharpness for some weight savings, bokeh, and image quality from M lenses. I also hope to have an ultra thin sensor mod and Leica M camera in the future. I should probably look for the lenses are less affected by the thick sensor glass like the 35/1.2 or 40/1.2.
OscarF wrote:
akashyap wrote
I was thinking of pairing this adapter with a Voigtlander 35/1.5 or 40/1.2 on an A7Cx to make my own RX1R3. It’ll obviously be bigger, but at least it will try eyeAF on shutter, something the RX1 series won’t doVoigtlander 35mm f/1.5
If you're trying to match an RX1R3 why not use something designed for Sony (with a slower aperture). It would probably be smaller, lighter, sharper and faster focusing than the M glass attached to the Techart?
Fair point! The only lightweight native E mount lenses that I like in that range for rendering are probably the Sigma 35/2 or Sigma 45/2.8 and I should give them a shot.
Otherwise, I don't mind sacrificing corner to corner sharpness for some weight savings, bokeh, and image quality from M lenses. I also hope to have an ultra thin sensor mod and Leica M camera in the future. I should probably look for the lenses are less affected by the thick sensor glass like the 35/1.2 or 40/1.2.
Mar 11, 2024 at 09:00 PM
p.19 #15Techart Pro LM-EA9 Review
Hi
I bought the LM-EA9 recently for my a7s, and find that AF is very slow, after much hunting. The lenses used are a Biogon 28mm f2.8 and a 50mm Summicron. I tried all versions of adapter firmware with little improvement. Only Single shot AF is available with this adapter on the 7s.
The shutter trips only after 2-3 seconds of being fully depressed! The first shot might be better, but not always the case. OK for landscapes, I suppose. Factory Support has not responded to my request for assistance.
Khor
I bought the LM-EA9 recently for my a7s, and find that AF is very slow, after much hunting. The lenses used are a Biogon 28mm f2.8 and a 50mm Summicron. I tried all versions of adapter firmware with little improvement. Only Single shot AF is available with this adapter on the 7s.
The shutter trips only after 2-3 seconds of being fully depressed! The first shot might be better, but not always the case. OK for landscapes, I suppose. Factory Support has not responded to my request for assistance.
Khor
Mar 11, 2024 at 09:27 PM
p.19 #16Techart Pro LM-EA9 Review
BastianK wrote:
My LM-EA9 is still working fine, but sadly I have received too many reports of this adapter failing lately.
And these have been confirmed sales through the official channels.
What is even worse: it seems the customer support is pretty much non-existent at this point.
I therefore added several warnings to my review and until something about this situation changes I have to advise against buying one.
Are there similar failure reports with the Nikon version of this adapter (TZM-02)?
My LM-EA9 is still working fine, but sadly I have received too many reports of this adapter failing lately.
And these have been confirmed sales through the official channels.
What is even worse: it seems the customer support is pretty much non-existent at this point.
I therefore added several warnings to my review and until something about this situation changes I have to advise against buying one.
Are there similar failure reports with the Nikon version of this adapter (TZM-02)?
Mar 13, 2024 at 10:43 AM
p.19 #17Techart Pro LM-EA9 Review
I'm using it with my a7rV and A7cR right now and really enjoying it. Eye focus tracking with my Summilux FLE, yes please. I have a 35GM, 35ZA and a fricken Loxia 35 but none of them look as good as my Summilux FLE. The more I use the LM-EA9 the more I like it.
I'm starting to think that if you use the adapter with the lens wide open near the center point as i do quite a bit, it's way better than the SL system. You just can't AF an m lens on a SL, period, so the advantage is at the edges. If you want optical perfection, go with an m body or SL, if you want the Leica m look with AF, use it on one of the new Sony bodies. It's fun and to me, it's still crazy that I can AF my 1969 Summilux 50.
Just some random thoughts, cheers.
I'm starting to think that if you use the adapter with the lens wide open near the center point as i do quite a bit, it's way better than the SL system. You just can't AF an m lens on a SL, period, so the advantage is at the edges. If you want optical perfection, go with an m body or SL, if you want the Leica m look with AF, use it on one of the new Sony bodies. It's fun and to me, it's still crazy that I can AF my 1969 Summilux 50.
Just some random thoughts, cheers.
Mar 30, 2024 at 06:54 PM
p.19 #18Techart Pro LM-EA9 Review
Matt Kerby wrote:
I'm using it with my a7rV and A7cR right now and really enjoying it. Eye focus tracking with my Summilux FLE, yes please. I have a 35GM, 35ZA and a fricken Loxia 35 but none of them look as good as my Summilux FLE. The more I use the LM-EA9 the more I like it.
I'm starting to think that if you use the adapter with the lens wide open near the center point as i do quite a bit, it's way better than the SL system. You just can't AF an m lens on a SL, period, so the...Show more →
I totally agree about the 35/1.4 FLE. My favorite 35mm lens!
If you want autofocus and better optics, try using M-lenses on a smaller APS-C sensor camera like those in the Fuji system. This setup crops out problematic areas caused by the thicker sensor. I've used the Fotodiox AF adapter for this, and AF worked well across the frame (not just center), better than the EA9 adapter. Just keep in mind, it only supports AF-S, not continuous autofocus.
I'm using it with my a7rV and A7cR right now and really enjoying it. Eye focus tracking with my Summilux FLE, yes please. I have a 35GM, 35ZA and a fricken Loxia 35 but none of them look as good as my Summilux FLE. The more I use the LM-EA9 the more I like it.
I'm starting to think that if you use the adapter with the lens wide open near the center point as i do quite a bit, it's way better than the SL system. You just can't AF an m lens on a SL, period, so the...Show more →
I totally agree about the 35/1.4 FLE. My favorite 35mm lens!
If you want autofocus and better optics, try using M-lenses on a smaller APS-C sensor camera like those in the Fuji system. This setup crops out problematic areas caused by the thicker sensor. I've used the Fotodiox AF adapter for this, and AF worked well across the frame (not just center), better than the EA9 adapter. Just keep in mind, it only supports AF-S, not continuous autofocus.
Mar 30, 2024 at 07:12 PM
p.19 #19Techart Pro LM-EA9 Review
Fred Miranda wrote:
I'm starting to think that if you use the adapter with the lens wide open near the center point as i do quite a bit, it's way better than the SL system. You just can't AF an m lens on a SL, period, so the advantage is at the edges. If you want optical perfection, go with an m body or SL, if you want the Leica m look with AF, use it on one of the new Sony bodies. It's fun and to me, it's still crazy that I can AF my 1969 Summilux 50.
Just some random thoughts, cheers.
https://live.staticflickr.com/65535/53620154738_0b9ff33017_b.jpg
https://live.staticflickr.com/65535/53619070127_293b462498_b.jpg
https://live.staticflickr.com/65535/53620392865_4432d6e374_b.jpgI totally agree about the 35/1.4 FLE. My favorite 35mm lens!
If you want autofocus and better optics, try using M-lenses on a smaller APS-C sensor camera like those in the Fuji system. This setup crops out problematic areas caused by the thicker sensor. I've used the Fotodiox AF adapter for this, and AF worked well across the frame (not just center), better than the EA9 adapter. Just keep in mind, it only supports AF-S, not continuous autofocus.
I've been very curious about the Fuji and Fotodiox AF. Which body would you suggest Fred?
Matt Kerby wrote
I'm using it with my a7rV and A7cR right now and really enjoying it. Eye focus tracking with my Summilux FLE, yes please. I have a 35GM, 35ZA and a fricken Loxia 35 but none of them look as good as my Summilux FLE. The more I use the LM-EA9 the more I like it.I'm starting to think that if you use the adapter with the lens wide open near the center point as i do quite a bit, it's way better than the SL system. You just can't AF an m lens on a SL, period, so the advantage is at the edges. If you want optical perfection, go with an m body or SL, if you want the Leica m look with AF, use it on one of the new Sony bodies. It's fun and to me, it's still crazy that I can AF my 1969 Summilux 50.
Just some random thoughts, cheers.
https://live.staticflickr.com/65535/53620154738_0b9ff33017_b.jpg
https://live.staticflickr.com/65535/53619070127_293b462498_b.jpg
https://live.staticflickr.com/65535/53620392865_4432d6e374_b.jpg
If you want autofocus and better optics, try using M-lenses on a smaller APS-C sensor camera like those in the Fuji system. This setup crops out problematic areas caused by the thicker sensor. I've used the Fotodiox AF adapter for this, and AF worked well across the frame (not just center), better than the EA9 adapter. Just keep in mind, it only supports AF-S, not continuous autofocus.
I've been very curious about the Fuji and Fotodiox AF. Which body would you suggest Fred?
Mar 30, 2024 at 07:45 PM
p.19 #20Techart Pro LM-EA9 Review
Matt Kerby wrote:
I'm starting to think that if you use the adapter with the lens wide open near the center point as i do quite a bit, it's way better than the SL system. You just can't AF an m lens on a SL, period, so the advantage is at the edges. If you want optical perfection, go with an m body or SL, if you want the Leica m look with AF, use it on one of the new Sony bodies. It's fun and to me, it's still crazy that I can AF my 1969 Summilux 50.
Just some random thoughts, cheers.
https://live.staticflickr.com/65535/53620154738_0b9ff33017_b.jpg
https://live.staticflickr.com/65535/53619070127_293b462498_b.jpg
https://live.staticflickr.com/65535/53620392865_4432d6e374_b.jpgI totally agree about the 35/1.4 FLE. My favorite 35mm lens!
If you want autofocus and better optics, try using M-lenses on a smaller APS-C sensor camera like those in the Fuji system. This setup crops out problematic areas caused by the thicker sensor. I've used the Fotodiox AF adapter for this, and AF worked well across the frame (not just center), better than the EA9 adapter. Just keep in mind, it only supports AF-S, not continuous autofocus.I've been very curious about the Fuji and Fotodiox AF. Which body would you suggest Fred?
I use the X-Pro3 and I'm absolutely thrilled with it. While some may not prefer the hidden screen, that's actually one of the things that attracts me to it. It also offers a OVF that works like a rangefinder. (But it's not like a Leica)
It's just slightly heavier than the X100VI, which also features an OVF. However, the X-Pro3 sets itself apart by offering interchangeable lenses, including the Fotodiox AF adapter, and a firmer grip without requiring any extra accessories.
For the price though if you prefer having a screen, the X-T5 is a great choice.
Fred Miranda wrote
Matt Kerby wrote
I'm using it with my a7rV and A7cR right now and really enjoying it. Eye focus tracking with my Summilux FLE, yes please. I have a 35GM, 35ZA and a fricken Loxia 35 but none of them look as good as my Summilux FLE. The more I use the LM-EA9 the more I like it.I'm starting to think that if you use the adapter with the lens wide open near the center point as i do quite a bit, it's way better than the SL system. You just can't AF an m lens on a SL, period, so the advantage is at the edges. If you want optical perfection, go with an m body or SL, if you want the Leica m look with AF, use it on one of the new Sony bodies. It's fun and to me, it's still crazy that I can AF my 1969 Summilux 50.
Just some random thoughts, cheers.
https://live.staticflickr.com/65535/53620154738_0b9ff33017_b.jpg
https://live.staticflickr.com/65535/53619070127_293b462498_b.jpg
https://live.staticflickr.com/65535/53620392865_4432d6e374_b.jpg
If you want autofocus and better optics, try using M-lenses on a smaller APS-C sensor camera like those in the Fuji system. This setup crops out problematic areas caused by the thicker sensor. I've used the Fotodiox AF adapter for this, and AF worked well across the frame (not just center), better than the EA9 adapter. Just keep in mind, it only supports AF-S, not continuous autofocus.
I use the X-Pro3 and I'm absolutely thrilled with it. While some may not prefer the hidden screen, that's actually one of the things that attracts me to it. It also offers a OVF that works like a rangefinder. (But it's not like a Leica)
It's just slightly heavier than the X100VI, which also features an OVF. However, the X-Pro3 sets itself apart by offering interchangeable lenses, including the Fotodiox AF adapter, and a firmer grip without requiring any extra accessories.
For the price though if you prefer having a screen, the X-T5 is a great choice.
Mar 30, 2024 at 07:58 PM