I really like the first. The second ... I know I'm supposed to be able to separate the model from the art, but in this case I simply can't. The feet just aren't engaging. Sorry.
mmm55 wrote:
Disclaimer - I'm not a portrait photographer.
I really like the first. The second ... I know I'm supposed to be able to separate the model from the art, but in this case I simply can't. The feet just aren't engaging. Sorry.
Thank you so much, I certainly understand that either of these images might not be to the taste of everyone.
Both photos are engaging! That's what photos should be. They should grab the viewer's attention and make them stop and think, if even for a split second. You may like the photo or you may not like the photo, but at least the photo would not be ignored.
Both of these photos are more unique than most. I like the originality of pose in the first and the unusual use of the feet as a prop in the second. Nice job!
story_teller wrote:
Both photos are engaging! That's what photos should be. They should grab the viewer's attention and make them stop and think, if even for a split second. You may like the photo or you may not like the photo, but at least the photo would not be ignored.
Both of these photos are more unique than most. I like the originality of pose in the first and the unusual use of the feet as a prop in the second. Nice job!