AGeoJO Offline Upload & Sell: On
|
p.1 #19 · p.1 #19 · Official: Sigma 16-28mm f/2.8 DG DN (E-mount and L-mount) | |
mjk115 wrote:
Nobody seems to care that the Sigma is 16 vs the Tamron 17? For me, I want as wide as possible for a lens like this. I had the Tamron, and it's a great lens, but I opted for the z16-35 instead, and it was more because of that 1mm on the wide end than the increased long end. Count me in as interested in this new Sigma.
Then there is the tried and proven Sigma 14-24mm DG DN. Personally, I would prefer getting the additional 2mm on the wide end over the 4mm on the long end with the existing lens over the newly introduced 16-28mm, For those that use physical filters, however, the new lens is more appealing though. The bulk and weight may also favor the new lens but the difference in the 2 factors may seem minor. In other words, whatever floats your boat. The FE ultra wide angle zoom area seems to be getting crowded, huh?
|