Official Nikon 400/2.8S image thread + some discussions
p.48 #1Official Nikon 400/2.8S image thread + some discussions
swedishtomahaw wrote:
Not sure if this is the place to ask, but I’m highly interested in this lens and was looking for purchasing advice. I purchased my Z8 via FM and had a wonderful experience, but the price tag on this lens is 3-4x the amount so definitely some hesitation.
Since its such an expensive lens, does it makes sense to a) buy the lens new (full price) from an authorized dealer to insure its quality and eligibility for repairs if needed, or b) buy excellent quality used for the cost savings. Are used lens on FM consider “gray”? Im told Nikon...Show more →
I bought mine used in Canada from a reputable seller here on FM. The price difference vs new was considerable (~$4K CAD).
Personally if I was in the USA and couldn't justify buying new - I'd consider going the Nikon refurbished route. Recent sale had it for $9967(+tax) and they come with 90 day warranty.
Not sure if this is the place to ask, but I’m highly interested in this lens and was looking for purchasing advice. I purchased my Z8 via FM and had a wonderful experience, but the price tag on this lens is 3-4x the amount so definitely some hesitation.
Since its such an expensive lens, does it makes sense to a) buy the lens new (full price) from an authorized dealer to insure its quality and eligibility for repairs if needed, or b) buy excellent quality used for the cost savings. Are used lens on FM consider “gray”? Im told Nikon...Show more →
I bought mine used in Canada from a reputable seller here on FM. The price difference vs new was considerable (~$4K CAD).
Personally if I was in the USA and couldn't justify buying new - I'd consider going the Nikon refurbished route. Recent sale had it for $9967(+tax) and they come with 90 day warranty.
Nov 26, 2024 at 04:41 PM
p.48 #2Official Nikon 400/2.8S image thread + some discussions
Hmmmm the refurbished route could be a nice option, didn’t think of that, thank you. What’s the general consensus on refurbished? Does the stuff tend be ok?
Nov 26, 2024 at 05:00 PM
p.48 #3Official Nikon 400/2.8S image thread + some discussions
In my experience, yes, the refurbished gear is in great shape. If I were you, I’d buy used or refurbished. The gray market designation comes when a piece of gear was originally sold in another country. Unless you have a serial number and ask Nikon, I believe it’s impossible to tell whether a piece of gear is gray market. It is also something of an open question as to whether Nikon will repair a gray market item. It seems to be true that Nikon will not service a gray market item under warranty, but there’s recent evidence (from NMerc) that Nikon will repair a gray market 400mm f/2.8.
Nov 26, 2024 at 11:28 PM
p.48 #4Official Nikon 400/2.8S image thread + some discussions
I'm not sure why Nikon provides a warranty of only 90 days. As a buyer, it makes me reluctant to buy something that the manufacturer is not confident about providing a warranty for more than 90 days.
Nov 26, 2024 at 11:51 PM
p.48 #5Official Nikon 400/2.8S image thread + some discussions
In general refurbished can be a way to save some money, but one has to be quick as stock is often limited especially with this item. There are stories of the more common lenses having quality control issues. So, no matter the lens, testing in the return window is essential. And mostly one has to be comfortable with punch mark/dimples Nikon puts on either side of the serial number which permanently marks lens as a refurbish.
Nov 27, 2024 at 03:13 AM
p.48 #6Official Nikon 400/2.8S image thread + some discussions
Thank you all for the replies and posts about purchasing this lens. This has been really insightful and helpful. I feel much better about my buying options and risks associated with each. I hope to be an image contributor on this forum someday soon
Nov 27, 2024 at 07:53 AM
RoamingScott
Offline
Activity
[X]
Details
p.48 #7Official Nikon 400/2.8S image thread + some discussions
That’s the price you pay to get a deal, if you’re not comfortable with it, buy it new. Simple.
tabishshaikh wrote:
I'm not sure why Nikon provides a warranty of only 90 days. As a buyer, it makes me reluctant to buy something that the manufacturer is not confident about providing a warranty for more than 90 days.
tabishshaikh wrote:
I'm not sure why Nikon provides a warranty of only 90 days. As a buyer, it makes me reluctant to buy something that the manufacturer is not confident about providing a warranty for more than 90 days.
Nov 27, 2024 at 08:04 AM
p.48 #8Official Nikon 400/2.8S image thread + some discussions
Even when you buy used on FM or elsewhere, it depends on how old the lens is. For e.g. if you buy a lens thats just 6 months old, you have 6 more months of warranty left even though you are not the original owner. That’s how it works at least in India, not sure if it is different for each country.
Nov 27, 2024 at 09:20 AM
p.48 #10Official Nikon 400/2.8S image thread + some discussions
Curious how many feet/yards away the cheetahs were from you
gannis wrote:
All Images shot with Z9 and 400mm f2.8TC, first image is at 400mm, next 2 at 800mm and the last one is at 1120mm
https://live.staticflickr.com/65535/54143487064_2833f7837f_b.jpgUntitled by Ganesh B, on Flickr
https://live.staticflickr.com/65535/54175398957_facc5e941a_b.jpgUntitled by Ganesh B, on Flickr
https://live.staticflickr.com/65535/54176560868_8f308515ca_b.jpgUntitled by Ganesh B, on Flickr
https://live.staticflickr.com/65535/54143443993_43af54ac47_b.jpgUntitled by Ganesh B, on Flickr
gannis wrote:
All Images shot with Z9 and 400mm f2.8TC, first image is at 400mm, next 2 at 800mm and the last one is at 1120mm
https://live.staticflickr.com/65535/54143487064_2833f7837f_b.jpgUntitled by Ganesh B, on Flickr
https://live.staticflickr.com/65535/54175398957_facc5e941a_b.jpgUntitled by Ganesh B, on Flickr
https://live.staticflickr.com/65535/54176560868_8f308515ca_b.jpgUntitled by Ganesh B, on Flickr
https://live.staticflickr.com/65535/54143443993_43af54ac47_b.jpgUntitled by Ganesh B, on Flickr
Dec 01, 2024 at 10:54 AM
|
p.48 #11Official Nikon 400/2.8S image thread + some discussions
First image is at 47 meters, about 154 feet and the 2nd, 3rd and 4th images are all at 71 meters, about 233 feet
newyork wrote:
Curious how many feet/yards away the cheetahs were from you
https://live.staticflickr.com/65535/54143487064_2833f7837f_b.jpgUntitled by Ganesh B, on Flickr
https://live.staticflickr.com/65535/54175398957_facc5e941a_b.jpgUntitled by Ganesh B, on Flickr
https://live.staticflickr.com/65535/54176560868_8f308515ca_b.jpgUntitled by Ganesh B, on Flickr
https://live.staticflickr.com/65535/54143443993_43af54ac47_b.jpgUntitled by Ganesh B, on Flickr
newyork wrote:
Curious how many feet/yards away the cheetahs were from you
gannis wrote
All Images shot with Z9 and 400mm f2.8TC, first image is at 400mm, next 2 at 800mm and the last one is at 1120mmhttps://live.staticflickr.com/65535/54143487064_2833f7837f_b.jpgUntitled by Ganesh B, on Flickr
https://live.staticflickr.com/65535/54175398957_facc5e941a_b.jpgUntitled by Ganesh B, on Flickr
https://live.staticflickr.com/65535/54176560868_8f308515ca_b.jpgUntitled by Ganesh B, on Flickr
https://live.staticflickr.com/65535/54143443993_43af54ac47_b.jpgUntitled by Ganesh B, on Flickr
Dec 01, 2024 at 01:25 PM
p.48 #12Official Nikon 400/2.8S image thread + some discussions
Here is a selection of images from this mornings walk around the park!
Wood Stork
Osprey with fish
White Pelican
Hooded Merganser
Juvenile Bald Eagle
Wood Stork
NIKON Z 9 NIKKOR Z 400mm f/2.8 TC VR S lens 400mm f/2.8 1/1000s 180 ISO 0.0 EV
Osprey with fish
NIKON Z 9 NIKKOR Z 400mm f/2.8 TC VR S lens 560mm f/4.0 1/2500s 110 ISO -0.7 EV
White Pelican
NIKON Z 9 NIKKOR Z 400mm f/2.8 TC VR S lens 560mm f/4.0 1/2500s 125 ISO -0.3 EV
Hooded Merganser
NIKON Z 9 NIKKOR Z 400mm f/2.8 TC VR S lens 560mm f/4.0 1/2500s 450 ISO -0.3 EV
Juvenile Bald Eagle
NIKON Z 9 NIKKOR Z 400mm f/2.8 TC VR S lens 560mm f/4.0 1/2500s 280 ISO -0.7 EV
Dec 02, 2024 at 09:10 AM
p.48 #13Official Nikon 400/2.8S image thread + some discussions
George DeCamp wrote:
Here is a selection of images from this mornings walk around the park!
You have some nice birds around your park!
Here is a selection of images from this mornings walk around the park!
You have some nice birds around your park!
Dec 02, 2024 at 12:18 PM
p.48 #14Official Nikon 400/2.8S image thread + some discussions
ChrisMak wrote:
You have some nice birds around your park!
We really do!! The park I go to is Huntington Beach State Park in South Carolina, its around #41 on ebird in number of different species seen there. It's a great place but this year a little slow but it's recently picked up again!
George DeCamp wrote
Here is a selection of images from this mornings walk around the park!We really do!! The park I go to is Huntington Beach State Park in South Carolina, its around #41 on ebird in number of different species seen there. It's a great place but this year a little slow but it's recently picked up again!
Dec 02, 2024 at 01:20 PM
p.48 #15Official Nikon 400/2.8S image thread + some discussions
Back at it after a small break!! 
Barred Owl by eric laquerre, sur Flickr
Barred Owl by eric laquerre, sur Flickr
Barred Owl by eric laquerre, sur Flickr
Barred Owl by eric laquerre, sur Flickr
Barred Owl by eric laquerre, sur Flickr
Barred Owl by eric laquerre, sur FlickrBarred Owl by eric laquerre, sur FlickrBarred Owl by eric laquerre, sur FlickrBarred Owl by eric laquerre, sur FlickrBarred Owl by eric laquerre, sur FlickrDec 08, 2024 at 07:59 PM
p.48 #16Official Nikon 400/2.8S image thread + some discussions
rick2906 wrote:
Back at it after a small break!!
Great job on these Rick!
Back at it after a small break!!
Great job on these Rick!
Dec 09, 2024 at 09:41 AM
p.48 #17Official Nikon 400/2.8S image thread + some discussions
Here's a few images from this mornings walk at the park. Not a great day it was cloudy, dark and drizzling but I found a nice subject, an Otter. Not normally around the park so it was a nice find!
Otto the Otter
Got fish!
Down the hatch!
Otto the Otter
NIKON Z 9 NIKKOR Z 400mm f/2.8 TC VR S lens 400mm f/2.8 1/100s 6400 ISO 0.0 EV
Got fish!
NIKON Z 9 NIKKOR Z 400mm f/2.8 TC VR S lens 400mm f/2.8 1/500s 6400 ISO 0.0 EV
Down the hatch!
NIKON Z 9 NIKKOR Z 400mm f/2.8 TC VR S lens 400mm f/2.8 1/640s 10000 ISO 0.0 EV
Dec 09, 2024 at 09:47 AM
p.48 #18Official Nikon 400/2.8S image thread + some discussions
George DeCamp wrote:
Great job on these Rick!
Thank you! It feels good to be back at it! 😀
rick2906 wrote
Back at it after a small break!!Thank you! It feels good to be back at it! 😀
Dec 09, 2024 at 02:26 PM
p.48 #19Official Nikon 400/2.8S image thread + some discussions
Leopard shot at 400mm and 560mm
Leopard on tree by Ganesh B, on Flickr
Leopard on tree by Ganesh B, on Flickr
Leopard on tree by Ganesh B, on FlickrLeopard on tree by Ganesh B, on FlickrDec 13, 2024 at 11:30 AM
p.48 #20Official Nikon 400/2.8S image thread + some discussions
Foggy morning and a perfect day to break out the 400/2.8
Brown Pelican
Northern Shovler pair
Great Egret with fish
Hooded Merganser
Brown Pelican
NIKON Z 9 NIKKOR Z 400mm f/2.8 TC VR S lens 400mm f/2.8 1/2500s 640 ISO -0.3 EV
Northern Shovler pair
NIKON Z 9 NIKKOR Z 400mm f/2.8 TC VR S lens 400mm f/2.8 1/2500s 220 ISO -0.3 EV
Great Egret with fish
NIKON Z 9 NIKKOR Z 400mm f/2.8 TC VR S lens 400mm f/2.8 1/2500s 320 ISO 0.0 EV
Hooded Merganser
NIKON Z 9 NIKKOR Z 400mm f/2.8 TC VR S lens 400mm f/2.8 1/2500s 180 ISO 0.0 EV
Dec 17, 2024 at 10:41 AM