ChrisMak Offline Upload & Sell: Off
|
p.16 #3 · "Nikon Z9 vs Sony A1 – The 10 main differences" | |
zhangyue wrote:
It just looks like Nikon’s idea of professional camera is different than others.
The toughness or the sense of toughness has higher priority. Maybe this is the target market for Nikon. I have to say I can imagine Id like a camera like that if the camera bring food on my table. It also bring a peace of mind for me if I am in field. We never know how much back end QA they did before they determined to design a body with this size and weight to meet their pro “standard”.
It is not for me though. A1 will fit me better for sure. On the other hand, if not for shutter less shooting, Z7x would meet all my need as a camera. I will just patiently wait for A93 or Z8 that I believe both will give what I want.
I actually don’t like camera shine on paper that cover all the specs at top, more than half of those specs are wasted for me such as 6k/8k, 30fps etc they are not free, you have to pay for something you don’t want and deal with clustered menu all the time.
I would much prefer a modular design that I can pick for. If not, then give me less features but make them really good by make it a still centric camera. In reality, I can’t have that. In That sense, the less feature, the better for me actually.
...Show more →
You sum it up very well.
To me, the Z9 comes across as a rugged professionals tool, with specs that are completely out of my use cases. It's a camera for a day's of fieldwork in journalism or reportage work, and you can go on the whole day without worrying about the battery, and you can switch between stills and super high end video. If you bump it, drop it, cover it with mud, no matter, the tool is made to endure.
A benchmark camera and a camera to admire, but at the same time a camera as far away from a camera that I would enjoy using as possible, either for travel, landscape, wildlife or birding.
And I hate to have to come to the conclusion, but the Sony A1 is exactly the camera that I would enjoy to use for áll these types of shooting: portable (travel) high resolution (landscapes) great dynamic range and iso performance (wildlife) and fast (birding).
It used to be clear: the Canon 1DX and the Nikon D4//5/6 are military grade tools, built for heavy (professional) use, and I think véry few on e.g. a forum like this would ever have considered buying one.
The Z9 appears to be about to change that, and that would be a great success for Nikon, but what will it actually mean for their body line-up? Will they feel confident enough to believe that the Z9 ís in fact a body for all serious users?
With Sony, the price is the only thing you will have to swallow when going for an A1, with Nikon you will also have to swallow large size and heavy weight. Is the Nikon birder/wildlife/sports shooter of the future Z years condemned to the form factor of the Z9? I have no idea, but I don't take for granted that the old D500/D850/D5 models will be ported over to mirrorless. The price point of the Nikon Z9 is conspicuously low, is it part of their plan to bring the Z9 to an audience as large and broad as possible?
Only time will tell I guess.
|