thapamd wrote:
BTW, I've changed the "look" of my website a little. Mainly, I've replaced the thumbnail images with what looks like old time slides and made the pop-up "originals" a little bigger. If you have some time, please take a look and let me know what you think. You can either leave a comment here, contact me via PM or send an e-mail through the website. Thanks!
First of all, the Mesa Arch site is just incredible.....as good as any I've seen from that location. Have you given consideration to producing a book....or even a calendar of your work? If not, you certainly should. I get so much enjoyment from your work....truly inspirational.
Re: the changes on the web site.....IMO, it wouldn't hurt to have the same 'name' on the popup of the large version that is attached to the thumbnails.
Additionally, I've always been a little perplexed at the lengths some online photographers' galleries go to recreate the 'analog' gallery experience. I.e., the frames, mattes, etc. Yours is very tastefully done, no question about it.
But I tend to see the 'online' web presentation of photographs as being a totally different medium vs the brick and mortar galleries. And it seems to me the 'display' methods for the b&m galleries were developed precisely to present the images in the best way possible for that medium, but don't necessarily translate to being the best method of display 'online'. Maybe it's me, but I tend to find 'frames' somewhat distracting.....sometimes downright grotesque (though that wouldn't include yours which do a very nice job of duplicating the real deal). It tends to take emphasis off the photograph, IMO. Even as tastefully done as your frames are on the large versions in the popups, I think it would focus even more attention on the photograph itself if the entire popup were just a simple black background. I do like the large white borders, but that alone should suffice to focus a viewers attention on the picture.
Anyway, I only raise the point to generate some discussion......not to 'criticize' you specifically. Given that so many online galleries seem to use these tools, I can only surmise my opinion is by far in the minority.