Also what do you think of people modifying photos (not simple B&W conversions) without your permission?
I'm having one of these things where people have just said I should put a watermark on the photos but I don't agree with them much. Looses the quality of the photo clarity in my opinion.. but anyway.. what do you guys think of it?
my thoughts... if you stick it in the corner, it'll be easy to photoshop out. if you stick it all over the photo (eg, the bike photo), it ruins the shot...
A subtle one across the bottom of the pic is fine . But not straight across the middle . I don't get why anyone (who isn't trying to sell there pics ) does it .
Ed W wrote:
Hey, it wasn't just because I'm one of the subjects.
Nice photos Zane, having fun with the lensbaby?
I thought that was Ed in the photo... black leather jacket on a friday afternoon? and who's the girl next to you?!?
Here is a post from another site, you would not wish this on anyone maybe someone might be in the know
From my local bulletin board, any Aussies getting offered cheap 10D or lenses in the next couple of months should check for these serial numbers:
Title: REWARD offered for info about STOLEN camera equipment
Description: REWARD for information leading to the recovery of photographic equipment stolen on November 26, 2005 from car parked at the War Memorial. If you have any information, please contact 0412 161641 or the police on 6245 7208, quoting incident number 345904. Equipment stolen was:
1 x CANON 10D Digital SLR (8363A007[AA]/1530501408)
1 x CANON EF 17-40L 4.0 lens (00206964/8806A003[AA])
1 x CANON EF 100-400L 4.0-5.6 lens (can't find the serial)
1 x CANON EF 50 1.4 lens (88200085)
1 x CANON 580EX flash unit (003565)
1 x Stofen Omnibounce flash diffuser
1 x large blue Lowepro AW camera shoulder bag
1 x Sandisk Ultra II 2.0 GB compact flash card
1 x Sandisk Ultra II 1.0 GB compact flash card
2 x Sandisk Ultra II 512 MB compact flash card
rwwlee wrote:
Nice photos Zane, having fun with the lensbaby?
I thought that was Ed in the photo... black leather jacket on a friday afternoon? and who's the girl next to you?!?
Yeah having fun with it...
I got the macro kit as well and been recently having fun with stacking macro filters for really close up shots.
JamesGreen wrote:
Zane, so they were done with a lensbaby? I was wondering about that.
...
Thanks James...
Yes, the first set (Friday) was taken with lensbaby 2.0 with or without the wide or tele converter
Second set (Sat - flowers) was taken with lensbaby 2.0 with +4 or +10 macro filters... The bokeh of the lensbaby is really smooth. Unfortunately my camera does not allow extension tubes + lensbaby
hydrotoast wrote:
Here is a post from another site, you would not wish this on anyone maybe someone might be in the know
From my local bulletin board, any Aussies getting offered cheap 10D or lenses in the next couple of months should check for these serial numbers:
Title: REWARD offered for info about STOLEN camera equipment
Description: REWARD for information leading to the recovery of photographic equipment stolen on November 26, 2005 from car parked at the War Memorial. If you have any information, please contact 0412 161641 or the police on 6245 7208, quoting incident number 345904. Equipment stolen was:
1 x CANON 10D Digital SLR (8363A007[AA]/1530501408)
1 x CANON EF 17-40L 4.0 lens (00206964/8806A003[AA])
1 x CANON EF 100-400L 4.0-5.6 lens (can't find the serial)
1 x CANON EF 50 1.4 lens (88200085)
1 x CANON 580EX flash unit (003565)
1 x Stofen Omnibounce flash diffuser
1 x large blue Lowepro AW camera shoulder bag
1 x Sandisk Ultra II 2.0 GB compact flash card
1 x Sandisk Ultra II 1.0 GB compact flash card
2 x Sandisk Ultra II 512 MB compact flash card
From my local bulletin board, any Aussies getting offered cheap 10D or lenses in the next couple of months should check for these serial numbers:
