i had the opportunity to be in the Top Rank boxing Bubble for the Lomachenko Lopez fight this weekend. though i dont use the 70-200 much in boxing action (most is shot with a 24-70), i must say its much faster AF wise than the 70-200 FL and ftz, and seems a bit stickier in AF-C.
turbodude wrote:
i had the opportunity to be in the Top Rank boxing Bubble for the Lomachenko Lopez fight this weekend. though i dont use the 70-200 much in boxing action (most is shot with a 24-70), i must say its much faster AF wise than the 70-200 FL and ftz, and seems a bit stickier in AF-C.
AS I have been saying native glass will outperform adapted glass noticeably. This will become even more obvious a distinction when the high performance pro bodies in the Z system are released.
1bwana1 wrote:
AS I have been saying native glass will outperform adapted glass noticeably. This will become even more obvious a distinction when the high performance pro bodies in the Z system are released.
its interesting because id mark my 70-200 FL as fast on my z6 with ftz than with my d5. just not as sticky, or if something is coming directly at me. but the S lens is arguably faster and stickier than my 70-200 FL and d5 combo.
