They do good work, and I have had several cameras converted to various filter formats for other purposes by them (infrared, for instance).
I also had the 35/1.7 but was unimpressed...the f/1.2 version being terrible at color smearing on my a7ii. However, I never did the filter stack conversion at that time and instead bought the Sony 35/1.4.
I loved the 35/2 APSH M on Leica M9, but color smearing (again, without having done a filter stack swap) was terrible on a7ii.
Grenache wrote: JVan_02 wrotesmpetty wroteThanks! Any tips on "proper" adaptation?I've never done it, but look earlier in this thread.Changing the filter stack can be done by places like Kolari Vision.
They do good work, and I have had several cameras converted to various filter formats for other purposes by them (infrared, for instance).
I also had the 35/1.7 but was unimpressed...the f/1.2 version being terrible at color smearing on my a7ii. However, I never did the filter stack conversion at that time and instead bought the Sony 35/1.4.
I loved the 35/2 APSH M on Leica M9, but color smearing (again, without having done a filter stack swap) was terrible on a7ii.
The CV 35mm f/1.2 II on a converted sensor is as good (resolution) or better (field curvature) as the ZM35mm f/1.4 is on a stock sensor.
The ZM35mm f/1.4 is basically perfect on a converted sensor.
smpetty wrote:
How does the Voigtlander 35mm f/1.2 SE (native mount) compare to the Voigtlander Ultron 35mm f/1.7 Aspherical lens (adapted)?
The Ultron 35 is my everyday lens on a7rii. I use a Yeenon close-focus adapter (copy of the Voigtlander). I love this lens, but not for its corner sharpness, which is probably due to Sony thicker sensor. If you can give-up a bit of IQ in the corners, it is very sharp on most of the frame, has the best sunstars (to me), and a beautiful bokeh.
I suspect the native 35/1.2 might be better in the corners though.
@vdo1 what do you feel we're lacking at this point? I mean, short of a 35 1.8 G (which, considering the size/weight of the GM I'm going to revise my prediction of a 8-12 year wait to 15 years to never) we have every option available.
35 GM: the king. Best, lightest, and cheapest of its class and type
35 1.8 FE: reportage masterstroke. No AF tests between the GM and this out that I know of, but previous AF 35 king of the heap, and considering the smaller elements it moves that might still be true. Extremely discrete, well constructed, lacking nothing but a certain punch to the optics.
35 f2: optical champ of the mid-speeds, with great construction. Lacking only sealing, better WO MFD performance, and perhaps a better MFD.
Samyang 35 1.8: best value lens here... if you get a copy. Somewhat between Sony and Sigma mid-speeds in optics.
j4nu wrote: Jesse Evans wroteRight, I forgot it needs to go to 2:1 and also have no focus breathing whatsoever.
tsdevine wroteAPO, perfect bokeh and macro capability right?
Jesse Evans wroteI'm still holding out for a FF 35mm f/0.8 with lightning fast AF that weighs 400g and is smaller than the Sony FE 35mm f/1.8.Don't forget the defined sunstars and perfectly round bokeh balls at all apertures at the same time!
My favorite 35mm is the 35mm 1.7 Ultron. I also have the 35mm 2.5 P II and Samyang 35mm 2.8. Well, a few others but those are legacy. I've also owned the 17mm 1.2 Zuiko and 17.5mm .95 Voigtlander.
The only other one I've considered is the 35mm 1.2 II Voigtlander based on reviews on this website, but the ultron seems better in the center. I'm not sure the slightly smooth OOF rendering of the 1.2 is enough to justify another purchase.
Now add to that the 35mm 1.4 GM which, I mean....I still want to give the 35mm 1.4 Sony/Zeiss a try if I can be assured of a good copy. It does have a very nice OOF rendering. I still think that lens is top notch even though I haven't owned it.
I hope someone whose crazy enough to own all of these can compare these lenses against the 35mm 1.4 GM. I figure, if there is anyone who is a 35mm fanatic, they're probably on FM