AGeoJO Offline Upload & Sell: On
|
scrappydog wrote:
I'm well aware of people's propensity to flip lenses. I'm with Fred on this one: once you try this lens, it's really addictive and the IQ doesn't disappoint. Several people have commented that their copies were decentered, so for those looking to buy off the B&S board, be wary of this risk.
Again, I love sharp lenses and I am all for getting the best out of the sensor, especially with the 61MP sensor. But there are cases, actually a lot of cases where the slight difference can only be seen if you seriously pixel peep. Under real life conditions in landscape photography where you stop down to get a certain depth-of-field the difference is almost non-existent. If visible, the real life rendition would play more of a role and at that point, who cares whether the branch in the very corner is rendered sharper or not. That is even less pronounced if you print the image, almost to a point of who cares . I am just saying...
I believe the difference in aperture for certain usage is more palpable. For example, the CV 21mm f/1.4 is a very intriguing lens, and if used in a certain way, can render a uniquely different image that, let's say, the Loxia 21mm having a maximum aperture of only f/2.8 can only dream of. Another example is the GM 24mm f/1.4 with that fast aperture speed that stands on its own. With the same token, I can see the difference in the Sigma 35mm at f/1.2 compared to another lens having a smaller aperture. Plus, rendition, both of the model and bokeh, can vary quite a bit used at wide open or close to wide open aperture. But here, we are talking about an ultra wide angle zoom mostly used for landscape.
With that said, I may end up with one but I will wait until the craze has subsided. I got caught too many time in such a craze already. Cheers and keep on shooting!
|