AGeoJO Offline Upload & Sell: On
|
scrappydog wrote:
This lens is very good. No honeymoon period for me; it's a keeper. It outperforms, or very nearly on par with, my best primes. My only other lenses that performed better were the Canon 16-35/4 at 21mm (barely), the Loxia 21 (in the extreme corners, barely), and the 24GM (across the frame, barely, at its worst FL). It was only noticeable that other lenses beat it at 100%.
I am not questioning the performance of the lens. Some folks buy the lens, not realizing the size and its weight. They get caught in the craze, so to speak. After a while they started rethinking about their lens line up and the weight starts to bug them, or some unexpected filter aspects, or what not. Plus, it is possible that another company or even Sony itself will come out with another lens or other lenses that will be competing with this lens. I have seen quite a few samples where some lenses got a favorable review by the FM crowd, people flock and buy those lenses and then they realize that those lenses do not fit their style, etc. A few Voigtlander and Zeiss lenses come to mind here. Again, nothing against the lens and that “behavior”; it is good for the economy.
|