And the person auctioning it off would PAY the highest bidder to take it away from him/her.
This contraption is so ugly.
nehemiahphoto wrote: genji wroteSurely no-one still believes that the ZX1 will actually ever be released.In 13 years, we'll be reading about how there's an auction for the unreleased ZX1 prototype for sale on eBay
considering the Zeiss ZM was made by Cosina anyway, I say just skip the blue badge tax Sony should've worked with them or with Voigtlander to make the spiritual successor to the R-D1 (another Cosina)
I personally think the RX1R line looks better as a compact full frame. I only wish the RX1Rii has an integrated EVF not a popup. The improvements of the ZX1 over the RX1Rii may be insignificant if you prefer to pop out your SD card and postprocess on your computer.
gordec wrote:
I personally think the RX1R line looks better as a compact full frame. I only wish the RX1Rii has an integrated EVF not a popup. The improvements of the ZX1 over the RX1Rii may be insignificant if you prefer to pop out your SD card and postprocess on your computer.
knshshnk wrote:
considering the Zeiss ZM was made by Cosina anyway, I say just skip the blue badge tax Sony should've worked with them or with Voigtlander to make the spiritual successor to the R-D1 (another Cosina)
Epson-Cosina, actually. With Epson probably having quite the weight in the development of that product.
And a successor would have to be full frame, which probably needs Leica technology (i.e. their patented variable size microlenses) so wide angle lenses arent a problem.
Sauseschritt wrote: knshshnk wroteconsidering the Zeiss ZM was made by Cosina anyway, I say just skip the blue badge tax Sony should've worked with them or with Voigtlander to make the spiritual successor to the R-D1 (another Cosina)Epson-Cosina, actually. With Epson probably having quite the weight in the development of that product.
And a successor would have to be full frame, which probably needs Leica technology (i.e. their patented variable size microlenses) so wide angle lenses arent a problem.
I would prefer it to be an e-mount camera with EVF, no rangefinder unless they create an hybrid solution like fuji
Wide angle lenses aren't an issue with Sony microlenses on their BSI chips if the coverglass is thinner.
Sauseschritt wrote: knshshnk wroteconsidering the Zeiss ZM was made by Cosina anyway, I say just skip the blue badge tax Sony should've worked with them or with Voigtlander to make the spiritual successor to the R-D1 (another Cosina)Epson-Cosina, actually. With Epson probably having quite the weight in the development of that product.
And a successor would have to be full frame, which probably needs Leica technology (i.e. their patented variable size microlenses) so wide angle lenses arent a problem.
Thinner coverglas helps, yes, but doesnt solve the problem.
In fact AFAICS even original Leica still cant handle ALL old wideangle lenses. Despite thin coverglas, variable size microlenses, and finely resolved sensors.
knshshnk wrote:
I would prefer it to be an e-mount camera with EVF, no rangefinder unless they create an hybrid solution like fuji
I would consider that largely irrelevant either way, but the original R-D1 was a rangefinder. It even had a lever like a film camera, instead of a motor to prepare the shutter.
From my perspective its really about what the results out of this camera would be, not about its viewfinder technology.
good to see that someone is still trying to bring the R-D1 like camera back, too bad it's just an APS-C but hope the best for the team3500 euros for that! DOA.
Yea, that price is too steep - but I like many things about the camera in principle.
The unit price for their sensor alone is 1600 USD - pretty sure it's an ams CMV12000. It must be hard to get lower quantities of sensors as a small company. It is impressive that they can build the precision optical rangefinder and electronics around that in small batches for about another $2000 and maybe make a bit of profit.
ams makes a full-frame CMV50000 47.5mpix sensor for $5500. The prices don't seem to move down at all since they are meant for industrial applications.
I would not take one if they were $500 I am not going to edit and send anything with it.
I already have more capable cameras with interchangeable lenses where I can edit quickly and correctly in LR/PS.
I do wish my RX100 would let me do a couple of minor corrections, color, exposure, rotate & crop and send like a phone downsized to 72 dpi 2048x2048 for Facebook and a landscape size in similar Rez.
I think most would all like to be able to do that at least our point and shoots.