philip_pj wrote:
If the current form factor of the ZX1 remained, if its lens is really good (Sonnar standard or better), if it had no unusual connectivity, and if it weighed/cost RX1rII level, would people buy it?
Trying to separate the issues from the actual form and shape of the camera here. It looks like it was intended purely to draw attention to itself and its user. Is that look desirable though, a plus or a minus?
If the weight/cost was similar to RX1rII I would be temped. Especially if the battery life and ergo are better. Those are my real issues with the RX1.
Having said that, "better" is difficult to quantify. I would have to "like" it at least close to as much. I have been tempted to try the Q and Q2 several times, and while the 28 1.7 Lux looks quite good, I simply don't like draw as much as the RX1 sonnar.
To me the major draw of the RX1 line is: Size, Full Frame and Sonnar. Take out one of those 3, I am probably out. Unless the lens is magical.