Trade safely
Please use protected, insured payment methods for all transactions
Archive 2004 · FS: Canon EF 28-70 f/3.5-4.5 II
p.1 #1FS: Canon EF 28-70 f/3.5-4.5 II
One of the fabled lenses of the second-hand market - the venerable Canon EF 28-70 f/3.5-4.5 II. Optically in very good+ condition, barrel in good+ condition. This is an old lens, but the optical qualities surpass those of normal Canon consumer lenses like the 24-85 or 28-105. Good sharpness and contrast throughout the entire aperture range.
Comes with both caps only.
Selling this lens to make way for other lenses...
$65 shipped USPS Priority Mail.
Added: OK, I'll throw in a Tiffen Haze filter 52mm for the lens.
PMs or emails, thanks!
Wenyao
Edited by nutek on Dec 02, 2004 at 12:28 AM GMT (Reason: added the words "EF")
Edited by nutek on Dec 02, 2004 at 12:32 AM GMT
Comes with both caps only.
Selling this lens to make way for other lenses...
$65 shipped USPS Priority Mail.
Added: OK, I'll throw in a Tiffen Haze filter 52mm for the lens.
PMs or emails, thanks!
Wenyao
Edited by nutek on Dec 02, 2004 at 12:28 AM GMT (Reason: added the words "EF")
Edited by nutek on Dec 02, 2004 at 12:32 AM GMT
Nov 29, 2004 at 01:11 AM
p.1 #3FS: Canon EF 28-70 f/3.5-4.5 II
Bump for a very nice lens. The 28-70 II has some draw backs, but sharpness and contrast aren't one of them. People rave about the 50mm f1.8 being a bargain, but this lens is right up there also.
Jeff
Jeff
Nov 29, 2004 at 04:50 PM
p.1 #4FS: Canon EF 28-70 f/3.5-4.5 II
Jeff, thanks for the bump 
bump+
sample photos from a recent trip:
http://www.galant-ho.com/fall04/newhampshire/index.htm
you'll have to look around at the EXIF below to see which photos are taken with the 28-70 lens.
bump+sample photos from a recent trip:
http://www.galant-ho.com/fall04/newhampshire/index.htm
you'll have to look around at the EXIF below to see which photos are taken with the 28-70 lens.
Nov 29, 2004 at 07:48 PM
p.1 #8FS: Canon EF 28-70 f/3.5-4.5 II
beedyb220: yes it is. All Canon EF lenses are autofocus.
jim: thanks for the comments
jim: thanks for the comments
Dec 01, 2004 at 01:27 PM