60HzShuffle wrote:
I like all three, but that second shot in the middle is amazing!
Thanks...
I waited about an hour with this heard hoping for some separation... I wish that the rear of the other ram, to the left. was not in the shot... but you can't always get what you want
Here is an image of the trail to Heliotrope Ridge on Mount Baker, taken a couple days ago, with the D850 and the 500mm PF. The glacier in the background is the Coleman Glacier. I enjoy the image compression provided at 500mm. Can you spot the hikers on the ridge?
Zoomed in nearly to 100% - can you spot the two pairs of hikers now?
Amazing that no company seem to mine this mountain at least from the photo.
Looks some expensive row materials for marbles can be harvested.
This is kind of a sad statement for me that your first thought is to mine a beautiful landscape. Haven't humans altered the natural landscape enough to meet their material needs?
My first thought was... hmm, lovely photo, and... wow, I'm so glad that there is some glacial habitat left in the lower 48. In my life, I have collected data on glaciers that no longer exist... it is refreshing to see one that is hanging on in spite of our relentless attack on the climate.
OwlsEyes wrote:
This is kind of a sad statement for me that your first thought is to mine a beautiful landscape. Haven't humans altered the natural landscape enough to meet their material needs?
My first thought was... hmm, lovely photo, and... wow, I'm so glad that there is some glacial habitat left in the lower 48. In my life, I have collected data on glaciers that no longer exist... it is refreshing to see one that is hanging on in spite of our relentless attack on the climate.
regards,
bruce
Hhh
Sorry if I did not express my self.
I am so terrified to be told as an answer to my post that I am wrong because there is a mine on the otherside of the mountain.
In such greed of countries and corporates, I lost hope in nature preservation.
That was my motive. Not like I am sorry it was not mined.
It is the English being not my first language. And I realy appreciate your honest reply but as I said my post was like
Thank God one beautifull thing survived the human greed.
I am so terrified to be told as an answer to my post that I am wrong because there is a mine on the otherside of the mountain.
In such greed of countries and corporates, I lost hope in nature preservation.
That was my motive. Not like I am sorry it was not mined.
It is the English being not my first language. And I realy appreciate your honest reply but as I said my post was like
Thank God one beautifull thing survived the human greed.
No worries... apologies for misinterpreting your intent
I apologize if I appeared to be rude to you. I am a biology educator and former researcher, and have very strong feelings when it comes preserving habitat and biodiversity.
OwlsEyes wrote:
No worries... apologies for misinterpreting your intent
I apologize if I appeared to be rude to you. I am a biology educator and former researcher, and have very strong feelings when it comes preserving habitat and biodiversity.
regards,
bruc
I re-read my first post. It was indeed confusing. I actualy appreciate you defending nature.
Where this lens really excels is really sharp handheld photography when you don't have time to grab a tripod. All taken with a D500 @ ISO 1250, fair amount of cropping.
I was going back through some images from a trip wifey & I took in early February and processing some that I skipped over on the 1st pass.
These are some of Momma's shots from the Henderson Birding Preserve. All shot with D500 & 500PF, no TC's on these shots. I know these look similar to some of mine, we were together. .
Anyone has an sling bag or smaller bag that fits the PF500 attached to a D500 body?
I'm looking for something very lightweight where I can just carry this, it should fit in the Peak Design 10l sling but would like to know if it would be possible fit in anything smaller/lighter.
.
