pasblues Offline Upload & Sell: On
|
RobCD wrote:
Comparing doesn't mean that anyone expects the 24-105 to have better IQ than the GM or better AF or build quality either. I believe many are interested in the comparison to see how close the 24-105 IQ is to the GM in order to determine if they can live with that difference to gain other things like more range, less weight and size and money.
I'd love a 24-105 that costs 1/2 of the GM and has better overall IQ but seriously no one has (or should have) crazy expectations like that.
Ken Rockwell whose review said:
"Overall
I love this lens. it's the best midrange zoom available for full-frame Sony cameras if you live in the real world where you have to carry your own gear all day. This 24-105mm is a pro-level lens at a consumer price! Someone at Sony is starting to take the photography market seriously, bravo!
The 24-70/2.8 GM is more of a showboat lens for people who don't actually use it (or who shoot pro sports and action all day and night), and the 24-240mm is a lighter-duty lens with longer range but less optical performance and durability."
He called the 24-70GM a "showboat lens for people who don't actually use it..." and raved about the 24-105 as "a pro-level lens at a consumer price"
That and other reviews and dialogue were influential distractions. When people have dialogues and express opinions about something - especially when those people are in a position of strong influence - hold the power to move opinions in certain directions.
In a world where camera stores are a rarity and buying on the internet is the norm, photographers rely on thorough, realistic reviews to help them make decisions. It's not hard to get caught up in indecision and confusion.
Edited on Feb 18, 2018 at 12:29 AM · View previous versions
|