This topic is in the 2017 archive. You can read it and like its posts here. It is read only.
Archive 2017The Nikon FX Image Thread
p.19 #1The Nikon FX Image Thread
Nice shots on previous page all 
A couple of more from me pretending to do birding
(now that I'm back at my home PC, I can see I think I accidentally upscaled a few exports..yay for finding the C1 setting to prevent that hah!)
I missed focus barely, but liked that I got both the bird and the bee :D
A couple of more from me pretending to do birding
(now that I'm back at my home PC, I can see I think I accidentally upscaled a few exports..yay for finding the C1 setting to prevent that hah!)
I missed focus barely, but liked that I got both the bird and the bee :D
Dec 31, 2017 at 09:48 PM
p.19 #2The Nikon FX Image Thread
Happy New Year !
Fieworks from a while back with 55/1.2 D810
https://www.zeissimages.com/gallery/1070/U1070I1513824857.SEQ.0.jpg
Fieworks from a while back with 55/1.2 D810
https://www.zeissimages.com/gallery/1070/U1070I1513824857.SEQ.0.jpg
Dec 31, 2017 at 11:36 PM
p.19 #3The Nikon FX Image Thread
Some shots with the D800E & Tamron 24-70 VC.
NIS_2646 by Ankur Jhunjhunwala, on Flickr
NIS_2656 by Ankur Jhunjhunwala, on Flickr
NIS_2671 by Ankur Jhunjhunwala, on Flickr
NIS_2709 by Ankur Jhunjhunwala, on Flickr
NIS_2646 by Ankur Jhunjhunwala, on FlickrNIS_2656 by Ankur Jhunjhunwala, on FlickrNIS_2671 by Ankur Jhunjhunwala, on FlickrNIS_2709 by Ankur Jhunjhunwala, on FlickrJan 01, 2018 at 09:31 AM
p.19 #5The Nikon FX Image Thread
D850 20mm f/1.8 @f/2.8 1/30 ISO 25,600 NR with DXO LAB
New Year's Eve Moon
Edited on Jan 02, 2018 at 01:54 PM · View previous versions
-Jay- © HCE HCE 2018
New Year's Eve Moon
Edited on Jan 02, 2018 at 01:54 PM · View previous versions
Jan 02, 2018 at 12:51 PM
p.19 #6The Nikon FX Image Thread
Wow
ISO 256,000!
I must be really behind
R
Laura will be happy you updated your copyright
ISO 256,000!
I must be really behind
R
Laura will be happy you updated your copyright
Jan 02, 2018 at 12:54 PM
p.19 #7The Nikon FX Image Thread
I didn't check his exif to see if he did. There's two places in the setup, Image Comment and Copyright, where I put it in all of my cameras (that have it, the D1h and D1x do not)
Reagan wrote:
Wow
ISO 256,000!
I must be really behind
R
Laura will be happy you updated your copyright
Reagan wrote:
Wow
ISO 256,000!
I must be really behind
R
Laura will be happy you updated your copyright
Jan 02, 2018 at 01:14 PM
p.19 #8The Nikon FX Image Thread
I need more light in my computer room.....
Reagan wrote:
Wow
ISO 256,000!
I must be really behind
R
Laura will be happy you updated your copyright
Reagan wrote:
Wow
ISO 256,000!
I must be really behind
R
Laura will be happy you updated your copyright
Jan 02, 2018 at 01:56 PM
p.19 #9The Nikon FX Image Thread
Nikon AF-D 2.8/180 wide open.
I really like that lens somehow.. More than expected. Surely far from perfect but much better and more characterful than expected.
Shot wide open on a Nikon D750:
Golden Fence, Mighty Skeleton by Jannik Peters, auf Flickr
I really like that lens somehow.. More than expected. Surely far from perfect but much better and more characterful than expected.
Shot wide open on a Nikon D750:
Golden Fence, Mighty Skeleton by Jannik Peters, auf Flickr
Jan 02, 2018 at 02:10 PM
p.19 #10The Nikon FX Image Thread
Jannik Peters wrote:
Nikon AF-D 2.8/180 wide open.
I really like that lens somehow.. More than expected. Surely far from perfect but much better and more characterful than expected.
Shot wide open on a Nikon D750:
https://farm5.staticflickr.com/4730/25587060718_a1140c12be_h.jpg
Golden Fence, Mighty Skeleton by Jannik Peters, auf Flickr
That is beautiful!!
Luka
Nikon AF-D 2.8/180 wide open.
I really like that lens somehow.. More than expected. Surely far from perfect but much better and more characterful than expected.
Shot wide open on a Nikon D750:
https://farm5.staticflickr.com/4730/25587060718_a1140c12be_h.jpg
Golden Fence, Mighty Skeleton by Jannik Peters, auf Flickr
That is beautiful!!
Luka
Jan 02, 2018 at 04:29 PM
p.19 #11The Nikon FX Image Thread
Thank you very much, Luka!
Your great images with the 300PF were inspiring me to look for other (tele) perspectives in my garden, that is one of the results.
I am actually very torn between the 300 PF (and a converter) and the 200-500 for backyard birding (and dragonflying
) and compressed landscapes.. These are really the choices that I always wanted but never had when I tryed to use my Sony for everything.
Your great images with the 300PF were inspiring me to look for other (tele) perspectives in my garden, that is one of the results.
I am actually very torn between the 300 PF (and a converter) and the 200-500 for backyard birding (and dragonflying
) and compressed landscapes.. These are really the choices that I always wanted but never had when I tryed to use my Sony for everything. Jan 03, 2018 at 02:28 PM
p.19 #12The Nikon FX Image Thread
Looking back at my recently sold D750
I never really gave it a chance
Reagan
I never really gave it a chance
Reagan
Jan 03, 2018 at 07:19 PM
p.19 #13The Nikon FX Image Thread
No, you didn't.
.
Reagan wrote:
Looking back at my recently sold D750
I never really gave it a chance
Reagan
.
Reagan wrote:
Looking back at my recently sold D750
I never really gave it a chance
Reagan
Jan 03, 2018 at 08:22 PM
p.19 #14The Nikon FX Image Thread
Jannik Peters wrote:
Thank you very much, Luka!
Your great images with the 300PF were inspiring me to look for other (tele) perspectives in my garden, that is one of the results.
I am actually very torn between the 300 PF (and a converter) and the 200-500 for backyard birding (and dragonflying ) and compressed landscapes.. These are really the choices that I always wanted but never had when I tryed to use my Sony for everything.
Thank you back to you Yannik
While I can't say much abut 200-500 as I never even touched or have seen the lens in real life, I can say 300 PF hit the sweet spot for me. It is the size of 24-70, and weigh less. It is almost a bit confusing for it to be this light. Image quality is pretty good, but it really is the weight that is the major point for me. I do like going hiking, and while I would like to take a long tele, I do not want to be limited to have just telephoto either. With the weight of 200-500, I could not imagine taking any other lens if I went hiking with it. With the weight of 300 PF, taking a few more lens is not much of an issue. Currently, I do not own any wide angle AF lenses, but if I get something like 24/1.8, I can go hiking with 24/1.8, 58/1.4, 300/4 PF and that can make an interestingly unique and light AF lens setup. I was seduced by the idea of having the 'one lens that takes all wild life' 200-500, but honestly, I have not done much of wild life shots either. I can't even identify most birds around here. So, I decided that if I find myself leaning toward wild life shooting, I may consider 200-500 that time. Right now, I am simply interested in the different opportunity for composition and the quality of images that it can provide. If you go with th 200-500 route, we can compare our notes.
Luka
Thank you very much, Luka!
Your great images with the 300PF were inspiring me to look for other (tele) perspectives in my garden, that is one of the results.
I am actually very torn between the 300 PF (and a converter) and the 200-500 for backyard birding (and dragonflying
) and compressed landscapes.. These are really the choices that I always wanted but never had when I tryed to use my Sony for everything. Thank you back to you Yannik
While I can't say much abut 200-500 as I never even touched or have seen the lens in real life, I can say 300 PF hit the sweet spot for me. It is the size of 24-70, and weigh less. It is almost a bit confusing for it to be this light. Image quality is pretty good, but it really is the weight that is the major point for me. I do like going hiking, and while I would like to take a long tele, I do not want to be limited to have just telephoto either. With the weight of 200-500, I could not imagine taking any other lens if I went hiking with it. With the weight of 300 PF, taking a few more lens is not much of an issue. Currently, I do not own any wide angle AF lenses, but if I get something like 24/1.8, I can go hiking with 24/1.8, 58/1.4, 300/4 PF and that can make an interestingly unique and light AF lens setup. I was seduced by the idea of having the 'one lens that takes all wild life' 200-500, but honestly, I have not done much of wild life shots either. I can't even identify most birds around here. So, I decided that if I find myself leaning toward wild life shooting, I may consider 200-500 that time. Right now, I am simply interested in the different opportunity for composition and the quality of images that it can provide. If you go with th 200-500 route, we can compare our notes.
Luka
Jan 03, 2018 at 08:35 PM
p.19 #15The Nikon FX Image Thread
Reagan wrote:
Looking back at my recently sold D750
I never really gave it a chance
Reagan
Well, when you get bored with D800, you can always play with D750 or D850
Looking back at my recently sold D750
I never really gave it a chance
Reagan
Well, when you get bored with D800, you can always play with D750 or D850
Jan 03, 2018 at 08:38 PM
p.19 #16The Nikon FX Image Thread
From this weekend. D810 and 24-70
https://www.nikonimages.com/gallery/1100/U1100I1515033873.SEQ.0.jpg
https://www.nikonimages.com/gallery/1100/U1100I1515033873.SEQ.0.jpg
Jan 03, 2018 at 08:45 PM
mshi
Offline
Activity
[X]
Details
p.19 #17The Nikon FX Image Thread
D810 & Nikon 16-35/4VR at 16mm f/11. Shot in both RAW and the lowest JPEG. This was processed by my low-end Android phone at the time.
Jan 03, 2018 at 11:04 PM
p.19 #18The Nikon FX Image Thread
A sunset and sunrise in different states (not on the same day)
(not on the same day)Jan 04, 2018 at 06:51 PM
p.19 #19The Nikon FX Image Thread
This morning I picked up a mint used 105 f/2.8 VR from a wedding/event photographer who has just moved to Fuji XT2 system. First few shots with this lens and I really feel I am going to love this lens. I am surprised how good it is as a portrait lens
 |
||
 |
||
|
|
||
 |
||
|
|
||
 |
||
|
Jan 05, 2018 at 10:02 PM
p.19 #20The Nikon FX Image Thread
Was this taken in Jiayuguan?
mshi wrote:
D810 & Nikon 16-35/4VR at 16mm f/11. Shot in both RAW and the lowest JPEG. This was processed by my low-end Android phone at the time.
https://c1.staticflickr.com/1/653/22755180469_bf88e69b6c_c.jpg
mshi wrote:
D810 & Nikon 16-35/4VR at 16mm f/11. Shot in both RAW and the lowest JPEG. This was processed by my low-end Android phone at the time.
https://c1.staticflickr.com/1/653/22755180469_bf88e69b6c_c.jpg
 |
||
 © webmstrk9 2018 |
||
|
Jan 05, 2018 at 10:22 PM