Smitty,
Nice pics. #2-4 shows versatility of 24-120 very well. I must say, though #1 would have been better served with longer than 120mm, like 200-500. I have not embarked on shooting birds, so you are far advanced in that area, but judging from 200-500 thread, I agree with Charles. That thread may convince her ?
I thought long and hard between 200-500, 300/4 AFS, 300/4 PF. In the end, for my interest in compression and abstraction, VR and Light weight of 300/4 PF rose to the top, although I really did not like the higher price tag, as it felt like a tad 'rigged' pricing. I almost went with 300/4 AFS from that reason.
Definitely the 200-500 at the minimum. Or ask for the 800.
cputeq wrote:
So I need some short CC on these -- Generally speaking are they okay? I ask because I'm editing on a 17" 4K laptop. The 'problem' with this is that it simulates prints pretty well, meaning the resolution density is such that many photos look good.
I had to crop heavily on the bird shots because the 24-120 isn't known as a birding lens
I tried to tell my wife I *need* the 200-500 but I don't think she bought it.
Jay, thank you for your kind words. But I think what I try to capture in those images is super banal stuff, sunlight and shadows on a wall that most photographers don't even bother to point their cameras at.
Reagan wrote:
Smitty,
What lens are you using?
Are you missing the Fuji ?
Reagan
The 45mm shots are the Tamron 45 1.8 and the 14mm shots are the Rokinon 14mm 2.8.
Re: Fuji
Honestly I miss the EVF the most --it was nice, especially if I need to quick-check MF on the Rokinon (viewing 100% on the EVF is so superior to using the rear LCD) but overall it's not as missed as I thought it would be.
I am enjoying as good/better AF (depending on circumstances) on the D750 and better noise performance - I don't hesitate to hit 3200 routinely and 6400 is decent enough (I don't like going above 6400 if I can). I really like the 'look' I get from FF and low ISO that I just don't see on my Fuji files, though it's not a HUGE difference, it's there.
I miss my longer lens (had the 55-200 on Fuji) but I like the 24-120 on my Nikon, which is a great lens.
So *overall* there are some aspects I miss about Fuji, but I'd say it's all lateral to me vs. an "upgrade / downgrade" mentality. Better low light, easier to PP files, but worse starting color, larger lenses, etc. etc. etc. I'm not regretting my decision to move to Nikon, so there's that And if/when I get the 200-500 and the 105/1.4, I think I'll really enjoy those.