ylimehajile wrote:
The colors/pop are amazing. How much post processing was done on this image (other than the stitch)? In other words, how much of this is lens and how much is post?
This shot did require some post but mostly because I was shooting through tinted glass. Once I got the white balance right, the rest was merely brightening the entire image due to that tinted glass followed by reducing the haze on the distant mountains. The lens has plenty of color pop in the right conditions and light.
Sorry, going off on a slight tangent here, but I thought the new 35mm 1.4 FE mount lens from Voigtlander was supposed to be the old classic VM 35mm 1.4 optimised for the Sony sensor.
But according to this description it now has an aspherical element.
Does this mean it has a new optical formular?!
They may have gone overboard with the buzzwords. No where on the Cosina site does it mention aspherical, and the lens diagram doesn't have an aspherical element highlighted (which they always seem to do if its there). http://www.cosina.co.jp/seihin/voigtlander/e-mount/e-35mm/index.html
SharpContrast wrote:
Sorry, going off on a slight tangent here, but I thought the new 35mm 1.4 FE mount lens from Voigtlander was supposed to be the old classic VM 35mm 1.4 optimised for the Sony sensor.
But according to this description it now has a aspherical element.
Does this mean it has a new optical formular?!
jhinkey wrote:
Well, the multi-coated single element 5000mm (0.20 diopter) PCX that was successfully applied to the 35/1.7 CV for field curvature issues didn't seem to cause any secondary color issues. So that's my thinking - if infinity could be at 2-3 meters it would be pretty weak. Max working distance for a lens focused at infinity is 1/D according to Wikipedia, so a 3 meter working distance would be a diopter of 0.333.
A 2 meter working distance would be a diopter of 0.5. Thus the 0.75 Leica would be 1.33 meters, which is maybe a bit close for me in some cases.
I'll probably get the Leica, but will also try out the 60mm diameter f=2m (0.5 diopter) Hassy Proxar (Zeiss T* coatings) if I can find a cheap one in good shape that I can mount in an adapter. There are B57 Proxars, but they appear to be older and likely single coated....Show more →
Just ordered a 60mm f=2m T* coated Proxar that I will give a go - first by just temporarily mounting the lens to the front of the 40/1.2. If that looks promising I'll pull out the lens and re-mount it using the usual transplant techniques and then really give it a test.
'the new 35mm 1.4 FE mount lens'
It's going to be an interesting lens in several respects. Most of all, we will see how the translation from fixed traditional designs goes when wrapped in a modern package with modern glass, modern assembly, modern materials. This is the exact opposite of the regular method, where cutting edge CAD is used to produce the idealized yet practical design to meet predetermined optical performance targets. CV put back the release a little, some sites still indicate Feb 2018.
CV is the most likely winner of the 'most interesting lenses award' of 2017-18. And 'most affordable character lenses' award, just as important a consideration in the coming age where lenses are made for use in specific tasks.
I’m completely sold on this 40/1.2 as my new go to daily lens. Love hearing from users that it covers both 50 and 35. I usually carry both. My question is that if you wanted a wider (not UWA), small, light weight prime to compliment the 40mm, what focal length would you buy. Which lens? I love a7r2 and want to return to traveling light. Many Thanks!
RobertHolloway wrote:
I’m completely sold on this 40/1.2 as my new go to daily lens. Love hearing from users that it covers both 50 and 35. I usually carry both. My question is that if you wanted a wider (not UWA), small, light weight prime to compliment the 40mm, what focal length would you buy. Which lens? I love a7r2 and want to return to traveling light. Many Thanks!
My classic 3-lens-travel kit is Loxia 2.8/21, CV 1.2/40 and Loxia 2.4/85
Fits nicely in a small bag.
philip_pj wrote:
'the new 35mm 1.4 FE mount lens'
It's going to be an interesting lens in several respects. Most of all, we will see how the translation from fixed traditional designs goes when wrapped in a modern package with modern glass, modern assembly, modern materials. This is the exact opposite of the regular method, where cutting edge CAD is used to produce the idealized yet practical design to meet predetermined optical performance targets. CV put back the release a little, some sites still indicate Feb 2018.
CV is the most likely winner of the 'most interesting lenses award' of 2017-18. And 'most affordable character lenses' award, just as important a consideration in the coming age where lenses are made for use in specific tasks....Show more →
I think it's on track to be released in February in Japan since Cosina updated their site today to indicate February 15th as the release date. Previously there was just expected release "February" without a date.
PEKA62 wrote:
My classic 3-lens-travel kit is Loxia 2.8/21, CV 1.2/40 and Loxia 2.4/85
Fits nicely in a small bag.
And I'm often going with the Olympus 21/3.5, CV 40/1.2 (used to be some 50, and I still sometimes go with the Sony 55/1.8 if I think I'll need the AF) and Contax G 90/2.8. The adapter for the Oly 21 is bigger than the lens!
The E mount 40/1.2 seems to be tweaked for the standard Sony sensor cover glass, but out of curiousity, has anyone tried it with a thin film sensor cover mod and noticed how much of a performance hit there is?
RobertHolloway wrote:
I’m completely sold on this 40/1.2 as my new go to daily lens. Love hearing from users that it covers both 50 and 35. I usually carry both. My question is that if you wanted a wider (not UWA), small, light weight prime to compliment the 40mm, what focal length would you buy. Which lens? I love a7r2 and want to return to traveling light. Many Thanks!
I've just added the Voigtlander Ultron 28mm f/2 and it's phenomenal. My usual kit is 28/50, so time will tell if these two are too close together. It's only been a few days since I've had the 28 in hand. Personally, I prefer MF lenses in just about every situation besides when I want to run-n-gun, like if I'm traveling with the family.
I'll probably add a Samyang 35 for those times, or maybe a Fuji X70 ir Ricoh GR. I thought about the Voigtlander Skopar 25mm, as it is very small, but alas, f/4 may not be fast enough for the light i shoot in, or maybe a touch too wide. I have the outstanding Canon FDn 24mm f/2.8, but I can count on one hand the number of times I've used it in the past couple years. 28mm is perfect for me. As wide as you can go without the perspective overwhelming the scene - in my opinion.
I'd consider the Zeiss 28,but I'm honestly too smitten with the handling of the Voigts to go back to fly-by-wire, no matter how good the IQ is.
Ultron examples:
Feb 01, 2018 at 09:39 PM
imagesfromobjects Offline • • • • Upload & Sell: Off
jhinkey wrote:
I think the "aspherical" part may be a typo.
I love the minimalist mystique of the Voigtlander site, but they certainly couldn't be hurt to hire a proofreader.
The FRONT PAGE, guys:
"250 years of experience - Voigtländer lenses are a synonymous for high quality photography.
Voigtländer provides an extensive range of great lenses. There are no compromises for all parts and components. So we can ensure most robust lenses.
Less is more- all Voigtländer Classic Collection lenses have a fixed focal length without auto focus. We use perfect glass types and premium materials and don't have to pay attention to the specific weight. Because no motor has to controll an autofocus.
With us it means the omission of some functions that are usually common. This sacrifice cares for notably more precision. Therefore all Voigtländer Classic range lenses have fixed focal length without auto focus.
Here we can use the most premium materials without having to pay attention on their specific weight – no motor has to control an autofocus. Our materials are very resilient – in daily use as well as for the use in all climate zones. The haptics are perceived as unique – whether at setting of aperture or when using of the smooth and solid running distance setting. In respect of the quality of our lenses we do not defer to any compromises.
Ideal llenses for landscapes and interios, cityscapes and your general, everyday photography.
Voigtländer lenses – Get thrilled of perceptible quality.
I think it's rather charming. Maybe a translation?
Rob
I love the minimalist mystique of the Voigtlander site, but they certainly couldn't be hurt to hire a proofreader.
The FRONT PAGE, guys:
"250 years of experience - Voigtländer lenses are a synonymous for high quality photography.
Voigtländer provides an extensive range of great lenses. There are no compromises for all parts and components. So we can ensure most robust lenses.
Less is more- all Voigtländer Classic Collection lenses have a fixed focal length without auto focus. We use perfect glass types and premium materials and don't have to pay attention to the specific weight. Because no motor has to controll an autofocus.
With us it means the omission of some functions that are usually common. This sacrifice cares for notably more precision. Therefore all Voigtländer Classic range lenses have fixed focal length without auto focus.
Here we can use the most premium materials without having to pay attention on their specific weight – no motor has to control an autofocus. Our materials are very resilient – in daily use as well as for the use in all climate zones. The haptics are perceived as unique – whether at setting of aperture or when using of the smooth and solid running distance setting. In respect of the quality of our lenses we do not defer to any compromises.
Ideal llenses for landscapes and interios, cityscapes and your general, everyday photography.
Voigtländer lenses – Get thrilled of perceptible quality. ...Show more →
jhinkey wrote:
Just ordered a 60mm f=2m T* coated Proxar that I will give a go - first by just temporarily mounting the lens to the front of the 40/1.2. If that looks promising I'll pull out the lens and re-mount it using the usual transplant techniques and then really give it a test.
Also looking for a decently-priced Elpro 4.
- J
Just bought an Elpro 4 (+0.75) and will give that a go compared to the f=2,000mm Proxar (+0.5)
jhinkey wrote:
Just bought an Elpro 4 (+0.75) and will give that a go compared to the f=2,000mm Proxar (+0.5)
Should be interesting. Post some 1:1 crops if you can.
Something to keep in mind is that they are only helpful up until 1.5m. After that, the lens performs great on its own.
Thanks for your reply. When I purchased my a7r2 I bought the SZ 35/2.8, loved the weight but never liked the rendering. Tried the Loxia 35, liked the rendering but found the lens very fiddly for daily operation. Settled on the SZ 35/1.4, love the IQ, but don't like the weight/size. the frustrations of lens buying
PEKA62 wrote:
My classic 3-lens-travel kit is Loxia 2.8/21, CV 1.2/40 and Loxia 2.4/85
Fits nicely in a small bag.
