RustyRus wrote:
I hate that you posted these- Makes me want to go buy this lens in Canon RF mount Great shots
Sorry, and thanks. After 2 years and trying some 3 dozen other lenses, it remains my most-used and most-enjoyed lens. If you have any interest in it, I can only encourage you to try it. (Sorry again )
On an evening walk:
ILCE-7CM2Voigtlander NOKTON 40mm F1.2 Aspherical lens40mm1/8s320 ISO-2.3 EV
ILCE-7CM2Voigtlander NOKTON 40mm F1.2 Aspherical lens40mm1/8s500 ISO-2.3 EV
ILCE-7CM2Voigtlander NOKTON 40mm F1.2 Aspherical lens40mm1/40s100 ISO-0.7 EV
How was the AF performance of this lens using the Techart adapter? Aperture wide open or slightly stopped down? How about focusing / subject distance you used, any issues? Which adapter version was this?
Thanks ahead for your reply..
grahamgibson wrote:
I went from the E mount version to VM to use the Techart adapter. I don't really notice any image quality difference in daily use. The upgrade to AF is totally worth the slight difference in corner bokeh quality in some shots. It's only something you might notice occasionally. Stopped down, I can't see a difference at all.
Techart LM-EA9. AF is pretty good. Not fast but reliable. Takes great pics of my kids, family with this lens. AF only works with this lens to about mid-frame so if you try to compose with rule of 3rds you’ll sometimes lose tracking. Some people have had their adapters fail, but mine was direct from Techart and still works 2 yrs later.
mojoh wrote:
How was the AF performance of this lens using the Techart adapter? Aperture wide open or slightly stopped down? How about focusing / subject distance you used, any issues? Which adapter version was this?
Thanks ahead for your reply..
I lived in Stockholm before moving to Norway (but I was born in northern Sweden).
Some friends and family members still live there, so I visit Stockholm at least once a year.
Great shots
