I just picked up the VM 40/1.2, M mount to do double duty on my M6. So far I quite like it, other than some fringing in harsh light. Here's one of my first shots on the A7R IV:
Would you be willing to share those exercises? As someone who uses zone focus to speed the process up I'm intrigued and always looking to improve...
Edit, just seen the earlier post, I get the idea now
1bwana1 wrote:
That is why I created a bunch of crazy hard focusing exercises for myself. What I found is that after some practice I have become reasonably accurate, and able to focus quickly enough that this lens works for many subjects.
What I also found is that manual focus is a lot like manual exposure. It is not the best choice in many circumstances, but it gives you more control in many other circumstances. This control allows you to create impact, and mood through better management of DOF and rendering. It is a valuable tool to have available.
I started with the CV 15mm which is basically always at infinity. The 40 mm at wide apertures is a bit more challenging, but also pays bigger rewards. Once I have the 40mm to the point that I am more confident, I intend to get a longer, still more challenging CV lens. Most likely with macro capabilities.
A big part of the enjoyment of this hobby for me, is learning and pushing my abilities.
Lee, I have seen many comet pictures lately but your is easily one of the better ones! I really love the composition and of course there is the excellent Voigtlander rendering. Well done!
BruceRH wrote:
Lee, I have seen many comet pictures lately but your is easily one of the better ones! I really love the composition and of course there is the excellent Voigtlander rendering. Well done!
Thank you. I had a few options that allow for north facing images but with the shape & style of this lighthouse & the fact we were shooting something in space we just had to go here. At 12:30am the drive home was only 20 minutes
nampramos wrote:
Anyone here using the 40/1.2 SE yet?
From specs, it should be exactly the same as the original version, but did someone test them side by side?
Great shots as usual on this thread by the way. Makes me want to go out again shoot, which I have not for a long time...
I did and they performed exactly the same. Personally, I am not a fan of the new barrel design but appreciate the weight saving.
I regret selling my CV 40/1.2 for the SE version and will probably re-purchase the 'classic' version.
