ricardovaste Offline Upload & Sell: Off
|
p.9 #10 · p.9 #10 · Voigtlander E-mount 35mm 1.4, 40mm 1.2, 65mm f2 in Development | |
arduluth wrote:
Definitely a matter of taste. The new E mount 40/1.2 and 35/1.4 lenses both have superior ergonomics compared to the VM 35/1.4 or VM 40/1.4, at least for me. I'll always take a focus ring where my fingers can get comfortable over a focus tab. It's kind of necessary given the size of the VM 35/1.4 and VM 40/1.4, but I found the 40/1.4 to be a pain to use compared to something with a real focus ring, like a Canon 50/1.4 LTM which has almost perfect ergonomics for me.
That said, I wouldn't mind of the aperture rings of these new E mount lenses had wings. It wouldn't be pretty but it'd improve the ergonomics. The aperture ring seems a bit too flush with the focus ring, might be hard to find by touch without wings or at least some space between the focus ring and the aperture ring....Show more →
Ah yes, that is true on the focusing ring. It didn't actually occur to me, I was mostly just looking at how similar the aperture ring was (and small), and how it would be easy to get them mixed up when keeping your eye on the finder.
Saying that, I can see why a larger focusing ring would be useful for a non RF camera too. I actually prefer a nub for RF lens in this range, but it's not for everyone. I imagine the throw would be much greater on this newer lens too, which would make a nub ridiculous.
|