fredmiranda.com
Login

Moderated by: Fred Miranda
  New fredmiranda.com Mobile Site
  New Feature: SMS Notification alert
  New Feature: Buy & Sell Watchlist
  

FM Forums | Post-processing & Printing | Join Upload & Sell

1       2       3              11              13              18       19       end
  

Archive 2004 · Let us testing Photoshop speed in our system

  
 
Jacksmyname
Offline

Upload & Sell: Off
p.12 #1 · Let us testing Photoshop speed in our system


Hi flappie. It may well be the scratch disc setup, not sure. But I have absolutely nothing running in the background except for my firewall (Outpost) when I use PShop or any other program, and I keep this system well maintained (constantly empty temp folders, defrag with Diskeeper every few days, etc.). I also have all the XP eye candy turned off, and have unneccessary services disabled. I bought this system about 3 months ago, and I've been extremely pleased with the performance.

Running XP Home w/ all updates EXCEPT service pack 2, same video card as you have.

Here's a site with some good info about background services:
http://www.overclockersclub.com/guides/windows_xp_services.php
Read carefully, and I'm sure you'll find a bunch of services you don't need that are running in the background. May/should give you a bit better performance overall.
HTH
Jack



Dec 18, 2004 at 02:43 PM
billbunton
Offline
• •
Upload & Sell: Off
p.12 #2 · Let us testing Photoshop speed in our system


Two sets of results:

29s.
Dual 2GHz G5 with 4.5GB RAM

23s.
Dual 3.2GHz Xeon (HT on) with 3GB RAM (Dell 670)



Edited by billbunton on Jan 03, 2005 at 07:03 PM GMT



Dec 19, 2004 at 10:26 AM
rogerfsmith
Offline

Upload & Sell: Off
p.12 #3 · Let us testing Photoshop speed in our system


70 seconds

Sony Vaio 2.66 GHz Pentium 4
1 GB PC-2100 DDR


Cheers



Dec 19, 2004 at 09:35 PM
Yoshi
Offline

Upload & Sell: Off
p.12 #4 · Let us testing Photoshop speed in our system


iMac G5 1.8Ghz w/768Mb RAM:

62 seconds, 71 seconds with iTunes playing.

Intel Northwood Pentium 4 [email protected] on Asus Intel E7205 board w/1Gb RAM, XP Pro:

69 seconds.



Dec 20, 2004 at 01:15 AM
Oystein
Offline
• •
Upload & Sell: Off
p.12 #5 · Let us testing Photoshop speed in our system


79 seconds

(Man I want a G5...)

Dell Dimension 8300
P4 2.8 ghz w/800 mhz HT
512 DDR-DIMM
Radeon 9800 non-pro
80 gb WD 7200 rpm HDD



Dec 20, 2004 at 11:24 AM
inov8iv
Offline
• • •
Upload & Sell: Off
p.12 #6 · Let us testing Photoshop speed in our system


Time: 146s

Desktop: Intel Pentium III/1.0 GHz / 128KB L2 Cache (single installed)
Motherboard: MSI - MS6321+100 / 694DPro 100
RAM : 1024MB DDRAM PC-133
Video Card :ELSA GladiacMX Gforce2
Monitor Resolution: 1600 x 1200 / 32bit
Software : Adobe Photoshop CS
OS : Windows XP-Pro Version 2002 w/ SP-2




Dec 22, 2004 at 03:11 PM
rayfordprice
Offline

Upload & Sell: Off
p.12 #7 · Let us testing Photoshop speed in our system


Time 2 min. 22 sec.

System Info:
Adobe Photoshop Version: 8.0 (8.0x118)
Operating System: Windows XP
Version: 5.1 Service Pack 2
System architecture: Intel CPU Family:15, Model:1, Stepping:2 with MMX, SSE Integer, SSE FP, SSE2, HyperThreading
Processor speed: 1694 MHz
Built-in memory: 767 MB
Free memory: 450 MB
Memory available to Photoshop: 698 MB
Memory used by Photoshop: 50 %
Image cache levels: 4
Use image cache for histograms: No

Based on this information, is there anything I can do to speed up my Photoshop operation?

Thanks,
rayfordprice



Dec 23, 2004 at 01:43 AM
CTYankee
Offline
• • • • •
Upload & Sell: Off
p.12 #8 · Let us testing Photoshop speed in our system


55seconds

PowerMac DP 867 (mirror drive door version)
1.75GB of RAM (1.5 for PS)
OS 10.3.5
PS 8

Did it 3x, each saving the file to a different HD (system, scratch, and where I store my photos). Same time every time...55s.



Dec 23, 2004 at 04:13 PM
CTYankee
Offline
• • • • •
Upload & Sell: Off
p.12 #9 · Let us testing Photoshop speed in our system


skasol wrote:
54 sec

Amd 64 3000
1gb of corsair 3200 cas 2.0
400gb HD 8mb
Radeon 9800xt

Not bad, and I wanted to upgrade for a mac, I'll think I stay pc, just add more memory. planning on buying the FX 55.

Edited by skasol on Dec 19, 2004 at 05:16 PM GMT


Wow...my dual 867 Mac came in just a second slower. You sure yours isn't slowed down for some reason? I'd think a 64bit AMD 3000 would beat mine by more than 1 second.

However, does make me happy with my 2 year old machine!



Dec 23, 2004 at 04:17 PM
imac
Offline

Upload & Sell: Off
p.12 #10 · Let us testing Photoshop speed in our system


63 seconds

AMD Athlon64 3000
512 DDR 400 mhz Ram
NVIDIA GeFOrce FX5200 128mb
160gb MAXTOR 6Y160P0 hardisk
Win XP Home Sp2

Awaiting another 512 in the post, see what difference it makes.

That 70s for 32mb of shared graphics is pretty fast & surprising.



Dec 24, 2004 at 02:04 PM
Marco
Offline
• • •
Upload & Sell: Off
p.12 #11 · Let us testing Photoshop speed in our system


65.7 sec

AMD Athlon64 3200+
1 GB Ram DDR 400
2x80 Gb Maxtor Raid 0
MSI GeForce 6800 GT 256 Mb
WinXP Pro

This is my "gaming system", I use Mac for photography.

As I already posted above, my G5 1.8 GHz single processor takes 65 sec while my PowerBook 12" G4 1 GHz takes 110 sec.
Those Dual G5 are quite impressive...!

Marco





Dec 24, 2004 at 04:19 PM
CTYankee
Offline
• • • • •
Upload & Sell: Off
p.12 #12 · Let us testing Photoshop speed in our system


bandit wrote:
65.7 sec

AMD Athlon64 3200+
1 GB Ram DDR 400
2x80 Gb Maxtor Raid 0
MSI GeForce 6800 GT 256 Mb
WinXP Pro

This is my "gaming system", I use Mac for photography.

As I already posted above, my G5 1.8 GHz single processor takes 65 sec while my PowerBook 12" G4 1 GHz takes 110 sec.
Those Dual G5 are quite impressive...!

Marco



wow...again, I'm quite pleased with my dual 867. I just can't help but wonder if I'm doing something wrong or if my system is just that fast? Faster than PC 3+ ghz, 1.8ghz G5s? Maybe its all the RAM I have?



Dec 24, 2004 at 06:05 PM
Hullodare
Offline

Upload & Sell: Off
p.12 #13 · Let us testing Photoshop speed in our system


44 seconds.

CPU: Intel Pentium IV 2.8
Motherboard: Asus P4C800-E Deluxe motherboard
RAM: 1GB (2 x 512) Corsair TwinX Matched Memory Pair



Dec 25, 2004 at 01:52 AM
pbfdrums
Offline

Upload & Sell: Off
p.12 #14 · Let us testing Photoshop speed in our system


Machine Model: Power Mac G5
33 seconds

CPU Type: PowerPC G5 (2.2)
Number Of CPUs: 2
CPU Speed: 2 GHz
L2 Cache (per CPU): 512 KB
Memory: 1.5 GB
Bus Speed: 1 GHz




Dec 25, 2004 at 11:18 AM
Michal Kajta
Offline
• •
Upload & Sell: Off
p.12 #15 · Let us testing Photoshop speed in our system


71s

Photoshop CS
Acer Aspire 1681 WLCi
Intel Pentium M 715 (1,5Ghz, 400Mhz FSB, 2Mb L2 Cache)
1GB DDR RAM
ATI Mobility Radeon 9700/ 64Mb
60 Gb HDD (no idea what type)



Dec 26, 2004 at 01:44 AM
Keyturn98
Offline

Upload & Sell: Off
p.12 #16 · Let us testing Photoshop speed in our system


88 seconds


System: E Machine 2800+ AMD Athlon

512 ram
Windows XP
Photoshop CS



Dec 26, 2004 at 01:44 AM
Sirfishalot
Offline
• • • •
Upload & Sell: Off
p.12 #17 · Let us testing Photoshop speed in our system


42s

15" G4 Powerbook
CPU Type: PowerPC G4 (1.1)
Number Of CPUs: 1
CPU Speed: 1 GHz
L2 Cache (per CPU): 512 KB
Memory:768 GB
Bus Speed: 167 MHz

PSCS; MacOs 10.3.5
Video: Stock 64MB ATI

This was with no other programs other than Stickies for the test instructions.
I was pleasantly surprised.



Dec 26, 2004 at 04:57 AM
nickrh
Offline
• • •
Upload & Sell: Off
p.12 #18 · Let us testing Photoshop speed in our system


49s

Dell 8400 3.0Ghz HT (Presscott)
PS Elements 2
Win XP Pro
2.0 GB DDR-2
7200RPM Serial ATA RAID
ATI x300 PCI-Express




Dec 26, 2004 at 09:24 PM
davekone
Offline
• • • •
Upload & Sell: Off
p.12 #19 · Let us testing Photoshop speed in our system


nickrh


Now if you only used PS CS we would have a fair comparison.




Dec 26, 2004 at 09:27 PM
nickrh
Offline
• • •
Upload & Sell: Off
p.12 #20 · Let us testing Photoshop speed in our system


Yeah I figured after 20 pages of replies I'd throw mine into the mix. I would almost bet that the two versions use the same routines for something as common as blurring. It also seemed like my nubmers fell in the right range for similar systems.

Believe me if I had PS CS I would have used it. But at least I pointed out that I wasn't using it.



Dec 26, 2004 at 09:57 PM
1       2       3              11              13              18       19       end




FM Forums | Post-processing & Printing | Join Upload & Sell

1       2       3              11              13              18       19       end
    
 

Welcome back
Log in to your account