I really like all the Batis lenses, with their positive and negative traits. The vibrant colors and contrasts, the strong micro-contrast, the very lifelike colors and skin tones, the powerful image rendering – especially the wonderful depth you get in some images – and the best weather sealing you could ever wish for. Add to that the moderate weight of the lenses. The design is polarizing – I think it's beautiful, like modern art exhibition pieces.
The Batis 40/2 – 40mm and f2 doesn't sound that extraordinary at first, but looking through the viewfinder makes you understand that it's an exceptional lens. If I could only use one lens from now on, I would choose the Batis 40/2 CF. By the way, the Batis 40 and Batis 18 are a wonderful, lightweight combo for a city trip.
hd_123 wrote:
I have the Batis 18 and 135 (and non-manual focusing Batis 85, where the autofocus still works for some weird reason), and I've considering the Batis 40. Looking the images on this thread, none of the photos taken with the 40mm stood out, unlike the 18 and 135 for example. Is this because 40mm is in the range of the most common focal lengths of pictures?