I may have odd taste, but I prefer it when I web-crop out the unlit part of the arch at top. I bring it down to the highest point of the underside (about the third quarter across horizontally). Again, I may be weird, but I just wanted to throw that out there.
I may have odd taste, but I prefer it when I web-crop out the unlit part of the arch at top. I bring it down to the highest point of the underside (about the third quarter across horizontally). Again, I may be weird, but I just wanted to throw that out there.
Thank you for your suggestion. I tried it out but I like it better how it is.
A truly gorgeous take on this scene, and totally worth showing up to shoot such an icon! When the light is this good I don't care how "over-shot" a spot might be, it's still a wonder to behold.
WRT the post-processing though, I'm not a big fan of the glowy effect that was applied, it works beautifully on the background clouds but the foreground just looks like there's a haze over it. But that's just me, I prefer simple / traditional adjustments mostly.
matthewsaville wrote:
A truly gorgeous take on this scene, and totally worth showing up to shoot such an icon! When the light is this good I don't care how "over-shot" a spot might be, it's still a wonder to behold.
WRT the post-processing though, I'm not a big fan of the glowy effect that was applied, it works beautifully on the background clouds but the foreground just looks like there's a haze over it. But that's just me, I prefer simple / traditional adjustments mostly.
Hey Matthew,
thank you for your comment. Its all personal taste ofc. Actually I didnt use much "glow" in the foreground but in the background I did use some of it. I like the effect together with the mist in the canyon.
