Yea it looks like that when mounted . Thanks Tim really appreciate it. They must of changed it from the 35 and 50 as this overlaps more on the mount itself. Actually it's better weather sealing. Okay I feel much better now. Off to go run this little beauty. lol
GMPhotography wrote:
Yea it looks like that when mounted . Thanks Tim really appreciate it. They must of changed it from the 35 and 50 as this overlaps more on the mount itself. Actually it's better weather sealing. Okay I feel much better now. Off to go run this little beauty. lol
I got a review sample of the Loxia 21 yesterday, and the seal looks like it has the perfect amount of compression...it flares out flush against the mount. No overlap on what I'm seeing.
The few minutes I got to shoot with it, it looks pretty good. Really beautiful drawing style with great contrast. Can't wait to shoot more with it. I still think it's dumb that Zeiss didn't at least put the ability to automatically stop down the aperture blades...it feels odd to have an electrically connected lens that I have to focus, then stop down, then take the picture. Would love to simply set the aperture and forget it, while focusing wide open. In any case. Here's one shot I managed to grab so far.
I notice that my Loxia 21 mount is fairly tight on the A7rII. Not overly tight but definitely a tighter fit than my other native lenses. If I remember correctly, my Loxia 35 was similar. A couple of quick snaps on my way to work this morning. This lens renders colors incredibly.
BenjaminSmith wrote: rji2goleez wroteI needed to go to the post office . . . another opportunity to test out the Loxia 21Wow! Did you correct for distortion? That's spectacular if it's straight out of the camera.
I used Lightroom's perspective correction and lens profile for the loxia 21 but there wasn't much to correct!
GMPhotography wrote: lambers wroteGMPhotography wroteBoth of them handheld.
Folks early call this lens has it going on in spades, its just that simple.
Im going to do a review on it, its worth the timeNice. How does it stack up against your Batis 25?The Batis went the other day but this lens just maybe better , worst case its certainly on par with it no question.
Care to elaborate why you sold the Batis? I am considering keeping both (if I ever get my hands on the Loxia).
Money and gapping issue. Otherwise I love the Batis 25. Also with the VC15 going to 21,28 is nice gapping of focal lengths. Plus those three are small so nice travel . Than I have the 35 1.4 and Batis 85 which I'm going to get the 1.4 at some point. Also currently have the 24-70. So in effect with a little sharing I have AF and manual lenses plus I get landscape/ travel size than I have full onboard fast heavy glass as well .
One other thing of note sometimes the Batis 25 is a bit touchy on manual focus with infinity at night. The Loxia I just back off slightly from the hard stop and I'm at infinity. That will help at night.
GMPhotography wrote:
Money and gapping issue. Otherwise I love the Batis 25. Also with the VC15 going to 21,28 is nice gapping of focal lengths. Plus those three are small so nice travel . Than I have the 35 1.4 and Batis 85 which I'm going to get the 1.4 at some point. Also currently have the 24-70. So in effect with a little sharing I have AF and manual lenses plus I get landscape/ travel size than I have full onboard fast heavy glass as well .
One other thing of note sometimes the Batis 25 is a bit touchy on manual focus with infinity at night. The Loxia I just back off slightly from the hard stop and I'm at infinity. That will help at night. ...Show more →
Thanks for the reply. I am building a kit from scratch and want to stick with native E mount for now. My plan is the Loxia 21, Batis 25 (I own), Loxia 35 (I own), Loxia 50 and 70-200 (need to see the price on the GM version before I decide on F/4 or 2.8). I may consider the Voigtlander 15 when it comes out.
The only gapping issue I will have is 21 and 25 (and I use the term issue lightly here). I envision the 25 as an all around lens for me and the 21 as more specialty.